Smoking Intervention Practices in Texas Healthcare Centers with Sexual and Gender Minority Patients.

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Matthew Taing, Kathy Le, Maggie Britton, Tzuan A Chen, Michael C Parent, Irene Tamí-Maury, Isabel Martinez Leal, Anastasia Rogova, Bryce Kyburz, Teresa Williams, Mayuri Patel, Lorraine R Reitzel
{"title":"Smoking Intervention Practices in Texas Healthcare Centers with Sexual and Gender Minority Patients.","authors":"Matthew Taing, Kathy Le, Maggie Britton, Tzuan A Chen, Michael C Parent, Irene Tamí-Maury, Isabel Martinez Leal, Anastasia Rogova, Bryce Kyburz, Teresa Williams, Mayuri Patel, Lorraine R Reitzel","doi":"10.14485/hbpr.9.6.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for smoking cessation in centers providing behavioral healthcare for patient populations that included some proportion of sexual and gender minorities (SGMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthcare providers from 75 healthcare centers across Texas serving SGMs with behavioral health needs participated in a survey assessing their center's tobacco control policies and practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly half (N = 36) of participating centers had a comprehensive tobacco-free workplace policy, 30.67% employed ≥1 tobacco treatment specialist, 73.91% employed ≥1 prescriber, 80.82% mandated screening for patient tobacco use at intake, and 57.53% provided a template for tobacco use assessments. Overall, 70.67% of providers asked patients about smoking status, 69.33% advised patients to quit, 64.00% assessed patients' interest in quitting, 58.67% assisted patients with quit attempts, and 36.00% arranged follow-up. Providers' ability to tailor interventions for special populations like SGMs ranged from very low/0 to very high/10 (M = 4.63 ± 2.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are opportunities to improve policy implementation, standardization and usage of evidence-based interventions, and intervention tailoring within settings providing care to SGM patients in Texas to better address their tobacco use inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":44486,"journal":{"name":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","volume":"9 6","pages":"1074-1088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910434/pdf/nihms-1869733.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14485/hbpr.9.6.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for smoking cessation in centers providing behavioral healthcare for patient populations that included some proportion of sexual and gender minorities (SGMs).

Methods: Healthcare providers from 75 healthcare centers across Texas serving SGMs with behavioral health needs participated in a survey assessing their center's tobacco control policies and practices.

Results: Nearly half (N = 36) of participating centers had a comprehensive tobacco-free workplace policy, 30.67% employed ≥1 tobacco treatment specialist, 73.91% employed ≥1 prescriber, 80.82% mandated screening for patient tobacco use at intake, and 57.53% provided a template for tobacco use assessments. Overall, 70.67% of providers asked patients about smoking status, 69.33% advised patients to quit, 64.00% assessed patients' interest in quitting, 58.67% assisted patients with quit attempts, and 36.00% arranged follow-up. Providers' ability to tailor interventions for special populations like SGMs ranged from very low/0 to very high/10 (M = 4.63 ± 2.59).

Conclusions: There are opportunities to improve policy implementation, standardization and usage of evidence-based interventions, and intervention tailoring within settings providing care to SGM patients in Texas to better address their tobacco use inequities.

德克萨斯州医疗中心对性和性别少数群体患者的吸烟干预措施。
研究目的方法:来自德克萨斯州 75 家医疗中心的医疗服务提供者参与了一项调查,评估其中心的烟草控制政策和实践:近半数(N = 36)参与调查的医疗中心制定了全面的无烟工作场所政策,30.67%的医疗中心聘用了≥1名烟草治疗专家,73.91%的医疗中心聘用了≥1名处方医生,80.82%的医疗中心规定在患者入院时对其进行烟草使用筛查,57.53%的医疗中心提供了烟草使用评估模板。总体而言,70.67%的医疗服务提供者询问患者吸烟情况,69.33%建议患者戒烟,64.00%评估患者的戒烟兴趣,58.67%协助患者尝试戒烟,36.00%安排随访。医疗服务提供者为特殊人群(如特别健康人群)量身定制干预措施的能力从很低/0 到很高/10 不等(M = 4.63 ± 2.59):结论:在德克萨斯州,有机会改善政策实施、循证干预的标准化和使用,并在为SGM患者提供医疗服务的机构中量身定制干预措施,以更好地解决他们的烟草使用不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Behavior and Policy Review
Health Behavior and Policy Review PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信