HiRes ultra series cochlear implant field recall: failure rates and early outcomes.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Arianna Winchester, Emily Kay-Rivest, David R Friedmann, Sean O McMenomey, William H Shapiro, J Thomas Roland, Susan Waltzman, Daniel Jethanamest
{"title":"HiRes ultra series cochlear implant field recall: failure rates and early outcomes.","authors":"Arianna Winchester,&nbsp;Emily Kay-Rivest,&nbsp;David R Friedmann,&nbsp;Sean O McMenomey,&nbsp;William H Shapiro,&nbsp;J Thomas Roland,&nbsp;Susan Waltzman,&nbsp;Daniel Jethanamest","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2022.2145689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate rates of Advanced Bionics Ultra 3D/Ultra cochlear implant failure in the setting of a worldwide device recall and report surgical and auditory outcomes after revision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review was performed for adult and pediatric patients implanted with at risk devices at our center from 2016 to 2020. Device failure rates, surgical, and auditory outcomes were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 113 at-risk devices, 20 devices (17.7%) in 18 patients (two bilaterally implanted) were identified as failures. All devices were with mid-scala electrodes. Eleven patients (61.1%) were children and 7 (38.9%) adults. Twelve patients were found to have failing devices after reporting subjective performance decline; the remainder were prompted by manufacturer notification. All were revised, with the majority (83.3%) choosing the same manufacturer. All had uncomplicated original and revision insertions. Among adults, average word scores on the revised side were stable pre- to post-revision (<i>P</i> = 0.95).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with device failure due to this field action performed well after revision implantation. Patients with bilateral at-risk devices but evidence of unilateral failure may elect to undergo simultaneous empiric revision of the contralateral device. Three patients who elected to change device manufacturers on revision have variable results that require further investigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients requiring revision for a device field action overall perform well. At-risk devices continue to require monitoring as a growing number are likely to fail over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"24 2","pages":"87-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2022.2145689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate rates of Advanced Bionics Ultra 3D/Ultra cochlear implant failure in the setting of a worldwide device recall and report surgical and auditory outcomes after revision.

Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed for adult and pediatric patients implanted with at risk devices at our center from 2016 to 2020. Device failure rates, surgical, and auditory outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results: Of 113 at-risk devices, 20 devices (17.7%) in 18 patients (two bilaterally implanted) were identified as failures. All devices were with mid-scala electrodes. Eleven patients (61.1%) were children and 7 (38.9%) adults. Twelve patients were found to have failing devices after reporting subjective performance decline; the remainder were prompted by manufacturer notification. All were revised, with the majority (83.3%) choosing the same manufacturer. All had uncomplicated original and revision insertions. Among adults, average word scores on the revised side were stable pre- to post-revision (P = 0.95).

Discussion: Patients with device failure due to this field action performed well after revision implantation. Patients with bilateral at-risk devices but evidence of unilateral failure may elect to undergo simultaneous empiric revision of the contralateral device. Three patients who elected to change device manufacturers on revision have variable results that require further investigation.

Conclusions: Patients requiring revision for a device field action overall perform well. At-risk devices continue to require monitoring as a growing number are likely to fail over time.

雇佣超系列人工耳蜗现场召回:失败率和早期结果。
目的:评估先进仿生超3D/超人工耳蜗在全球范围内召回的失败率,并报告修复后的手术和听觉结果。方法:回顾性分析2016年至2020年在我中心植入高危装置的成人和儿童患者的病历。记录和分析器械故障率、手术和听觉结果。结果:在113个危险装置中,18例患者(2例双侧植入)的20个装置(17.7%)被确定为失败。所有装置均采用中尺度电极。儿童11例(61.1%),成人7例(38.9%)。12名患者在报告主观表现下降后发现装置失效;其余的是由制造商通知引起的。所有人都进行了修改,大多数人(83.3%)选择了同一家制造商。所有都有简单的原始和修订插入。在成人中,修改后的平均单词分数在修改前和修改后是稳定的(P = 0.95)。讨论:由于磁场作用导致器械失效的患者在翻修植入后表现良好。双侧有危险装置但单侧失败的患者可以选择同时进行对侧装置的经验性翻修。三名患者在翻修时选择更换器械制造商,结果不同,需要进一步调查。结论:需要对器械现场动作进行翻修的患者总体表现良好。随着时间的推移,越来越多的有风险的设备可能会出现故障,因此需要继续监控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信