Perceptual measurement of articulatory goodness in young children: Relationships with age, speech sound acquisition, and intelligibility.

Abstract

Speech language pathologists regularly use perceptual methods in clinical practice to assess children's speech. In this study, we examined relationships between measures of speech intelligibility, clinical articulation test results, age, and perceptual ratings of articulatory goodness for children. We also examined the extent to which established measures of intelligibility and clinical articulation test results predicted articulatory goodness ratings, and whether goodness ratings were influenced by intelligibility. A sample of 164 (30-47 months) typically developing children provided speech samples and completed a standardised articulation test. Single word intelligibility scores and ratings of articulatory goodness were gathered from 328 naïve listeners; scores on a standardised articulation test were obtained from each child. Bivariate Pearson correlation, linear regression, and linear mixed effects modelling were used for analysis. Results showed that articulatory goodness ratings had the highest correlation with intelligibility, followed by age, followed by articulation score. Age and clinical articulation scores were both significant predictors of goodness ratings, but articulation scores made only a small contribution to prediction. Articulatory goodness ratings were substantially lower for unintelligible words compared to intelligible words, but articulatory goodness scores increased with age at the same rate for unintelligible and intelligible words. Perceptual ratings of articulatory goodness are sensitive to developmental changes in speech production (regardless of intelligibility) and yield a different kind of information than clinical articulation scores from standardised measures.