Assessment of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials for Interventions of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Griffin Hughes, Bethany Sutterfield, Reece Anderson, Sam Streck, Cody Hillman, Samuel Shepard, Audrey Wise, Ryan Ottwell, Micah Hartwell, Matt Vassar
{"title":"Assessment of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials for Interventions of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.","authors":"Griffin Hughes,&nbsp;Bethany Sutterfield,&nbsp;Reece Anderson,&nbsp;Sam Streck,&nbsp;Cody Hillman,&nbsp;Samuel Shepard,&nbsp;Audrey Wise,&nbsp;Ryan Ottwell,&nbsp;Micah Hartwell,&nbsp;Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1007/s11126-023-10017-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has debilitating effects on quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assess changes in quality of life and serve as subjective measurements of patient experience. The aim of this study is to assess the completeness of PRO reporting within randomized controlled trials with interventions pertaining to PTSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, meta-epidemiological study assessed the completeness of PRO reporting in RCTs investigating PTSD interventions. We searched multiple databases for published RCTs of PTSD interventions that used PROs as a primary or secondary outcome. We assessed PRO completeness using the PRO adaptation of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial (CONSORT). We used a bivariate regression model to determine the association between trial characteristics and the completeness of reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After an initial screening of 5906 articles, our final sample of RCTs for inclusion was 43. The mean completeness of reporting of PROs was 58.4% (SD = 14.50). We found no significant associations between trial characteristics and completeness of the CONSORT-PRO adaptation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reporting of PROs was often incomplete among RCTs focused on PTSD. We believe that adherence to CONSORT-PRO will improve both PRO reporting and implementation into clinical practice to improve assessment of quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":"94 2","pages":"127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-023-10017-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has debilitating effects on quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assess changes in quality of life and serve as subjective measurements of patient experience. The aim of this study is to assess the completeness of PRO reporting within randomized controlled trials with interventions pertaining to PTSD.

Methods: This cross-sectional, meta-epidemiological study assessed the completeness of PRO reporting in RCTs investigating PTSD interventions. We searched multiple databases for published RCTs of PTSD interventions that used PROs as a primary or secondary outcome. We assessed PRO completeness using the PRO adaptation of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial (CONSORT). We used a bivariate regression model to determine the association between trial characteristics and the completeness of reporting.

Results: After an initial screening of 5906 articles, our final sample of RCTs for inclusion was 43. The mean completeness of reporting of PROs was 58.4% (SD = 14.50). We found no significant associations between trial characteristics and completeness of the CONSORT-PRO adaptation.

Conclusion: Reporting of PROs was often incomplete among RCTs focused on PTSD. We believe that adherence to CONSORT-PRO will improve both PRO reporting and implementation into clinical practice to improve assessment of quality of life.

Abstract Image

创伤后应激障碍干预的随机对照试验中患者报告结果的报告评估。
背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)对生活质量有削弱作用。患者报告的预后(pro)评估生活质量的变化,并作为患者体验的主观测量。本研究的目的是评估干预PTSD的随机对照试验中PRO报告的完整性。方法:这项横断面、荟萃流行病学研究评估了调查PTSD干预措施的随机对照试验中PRO报告的完整性。我们在多个数据库中检索了已发表的将PROs作为主要或次要结局的PTSD干预的随机对照试验。我们使用合并报告标准试验(CONSORT)的PRO改编来评估PRO的完整性。我们使用双变量回归模型来确定试验特征与报告完整性之间的关联。结果:在对5906篇文章进行初步筛选后,我们最终纳入的rct样本为43篇。PROs报告的平均完整度为58.4% (SD = 14.50)。我们发现试验特征和conther - pro适应的完整性之间没有显著的关联。结论:在以PTSD为研究对象的随机对照试验中,PROs的报告往往不完整。我们相信,坚持使用conther -PRO将改善PRO报告和临床实践的实施,从而改善生活质量的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信