Patient and Family Involvement: A Discussion of Co-Led Redesign of Healthcare Services.

Q2 Medicine
Sarah Jane Prior, Steven Campbell
{"title":"Patient and Family Involvement: A Discussion of Co-Led Redesign of Healthcare Services.","authors":"Sarah Jane Prior, Steven Campbell","doi":"10.2196/jopm.8957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The involvement of patients and their families in the redesign of healthcare services is an important option in providing a service that addresses the patients' needs and improves health outcomes. However, it is a resource-intensive approach, and it is currently not clear when it should be used, and what should be the reasoning behind this decision. Some health systems of international standing have created a patient engagement program as a selling point. This paper discusses how co-led redesign can be beneficial in improving health service and more effectively engaging patients. Potential barriers for patient involvement are discussed. Patient involvement can be integrated into the health system at three main levels of engagement: direct care, organizational design and governance, and policy-making. The aim of this paper is to describe how co-led redesign is compatible with different levels of patient involvement and to address the challenges in delivering a co-led redesign in healthcare. Co-led redesign not only involves the collection of quantitative data for assessing the current systems but also the collection of qualitative data through patient, family, and staff interviews to determine the barriers to patient satisfaction. Co-led redesign is a resource-rich process that requires expertise in data collection and a clinical group that is devoted to implementing recommended changes. Currently, a number of countries have utilized co-led redesign for many different types of healthcare services. Resource availability and cost, process time, and lack of outcome measures are three major limiting factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/jopm.8957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The involvement of patients and their families in the redesign of healthcare services is an important option in providing a service that addresses the patients' needs and improves health outcomes. However, it is a resource-intensive approach, and it is currently not clear when it should be used, and what should be the reasoning behind this decision. Some health systems of international standing have created a patient engagement program as a selling point. This paper discusses how co-led redesign can be beneficial in improving health service and more effectively engaging patients. Potential barriers for patient involvement are discussed. Patient involvement can be integrated into the health system at three main levels of engagement: direct care, organizational design and governance, and policy-making. The aim of this paper is to describe how co-led redesign is compatible with different levels of patient involvement and to address the challenges in delivering a co-led redesign in healthcare. Co-led redesign not only involves the collection of quantitative data for assessing the current systems but also the collection of qualitative data through patient, family, and staff interviews to determine the barriers to patient satisfaction. Co-led redesign is a resource-rich process that requires expertise in data collection and a clinical group that is devoted to implementing recommended changes. Currently, a number of countries have utilized co-led redesign for many different types of healthcare services. Resource availability and cost, process time, and lack of outcome measures are three major limiting factors.

病人和家庭的参与:共同主导医疗服务重新设计的讨论。
让患者及其家属参与医疗服务的重新设计,是提供满足患者需求和改善医疗效果的服务的重要选择。然而,这是一种资源密集型的方法,目前尚不清楚何时应该使用这种方法,以及做出这一决定的理由是什么。一些国际知名的医疗系统已将患者参与计划作为卖点。本文讨论了共同主导的重新设计如何有利于改善医疗服务并更有效地吸引患者参与。本文还讨论了患者参与的潜在障碍。患者参与可在三个主要参与层面融入医疗系统:直接护理、组织设计和治理以及政策制定。本文旨在阐述共同主导的再设计如何与不同层次的患者参与相兼容,并探讨在医疗保健领域开展共同主导的再设计所面临的挑战。共同主导的重新设计不仅包括收集定量数据以评估现有系统,还包括通过对患者、家属和员工的访谈收集定性数据,以确定影响患者满意度的障碍。共同主导的重新设计是一个资源丰富的过程,需要数据收集方面的专业知识和一个致力于实施建议变革的临床小组。目前,许多国家已在许多不同类型的医疗服务中采用了共同主导的重新设计。资源可用性和成本、流程时间以及缺乏结果衡量标准是三个主要限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信