Dexmedetomidine and Phosphocreatine Post-treatment Provides Protection against Focal Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Rats.

IF 1.6 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Xiaofen Sun, Fang Kang, Yuxian Shen, Yujun Shen, Juan Li
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine and Phosphocreatine Post-treatment Provides Protection against Focal Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Rats.","authors":"Xiaofen Sun,&nbsp;Fang Kang,&nbsp;Yuxian Shen,&nbsp;Yujun Shen,&nbsp;Juan Li","doi":"10.1267/ahc.21-00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study we investigated the neuroprotective efficacy of dexmedetomidine (Dex) and phosphocreatine (PCr) alone or in combination in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (I/R). I/R was induced by intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and reperfusion. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly allocated to the Sham group and I/R group, and the I/R group was further divided into three subgroups: Dex (9 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> Dex), PCr (180 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> PCr) and Dex + PCr (9 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> Dex + 180 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> PCr). All treatments were given intravenously at the onset of reperfusion. After 24 hr of reperfusion, the neurological deficit score (NDS) was determined and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed. Serum concentrations of malonaldehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) were measured and cerebral infarct volume was estimated by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. Blood brain barrier, neuronal and mitochondrial damage was assessed by optical and electron microscopy. Neuronal injury was further assessed using double cleaved caspase-3 and NeuN immunofluorescent staining. Compared with group I/R, Dex and PCr significantly reduced the neurological deficit score (P < 0.01), infarct volume (P < 0.01), and brain blood barrier, neuronal and mitochondrial damage. The level of oxidative stress (P < 0.001) and neuronal injury (P < 0.001) also decreased and surviving neurons increased (P < 0.001). Compared with Dex or PCr alone, the combination treatment had overall greater effects (P < 0.05). These results indicate that posttreatment with Dex or PCr decreases focal cerebral I/R injury and that these agents in combination have greater protective effects than each alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":6888,"journal":{"name":"Acta Histochemica Et Cytochemica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424249/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Histochemica Et Cytochemica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1267/ahc.21-00040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this study we investigated the neuroprotective efficacy of dexmedetomidine (Dex) and phosphocreatine (PCr) alone or in combination in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (I/R). I/R was induced by intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and reperfusion. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly allocated to the Sham group and I/R group, and the I/R group was further divided into three subgroups: Dex (9 μg.kg-1 Dex), PCr (180 mg.kg-1 PCr) and Dex + PCr (9 μg.kg-1 Dex + 180 mg.kg-1 PCr). All treatments were given intravenously at the onset of reperfusion. After 24 hr of reperfusion, the neurological deficit score (NDS) was determined and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed. Serum concentrations of malonaldehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) were measured and cerebral infarct volume was estimated by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. Blood brain barrier, neuronal and mitochondrial damage was assessed by optical and electron microscopy. Neuronal injury was further assessed using double cleaved caspase-3 and NeuN immunofluorescent staining. Compared with group I/R, Dex and PCr significantly reduced the neurological deficit score (P < 0.01), infarct volume (P < 0.01), and brain blood barrier, neuronal and mitochondrial damage. The level of oxidative stress (P < 0.001) and neuronal injury (P < 0.001) also decreased and surviving neurons increased (P < 0.001). Compared with Dex or PCr alone, the combination treatment had overall greater effects (P < 0.05). These results indicate that posttreatment with Dex or PCr decreases focal cerebral I/R injury and that these agents in combination have greater protective effects than each alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

右美托咪定和磷酸肌酸对大鼠局灶性脑缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用。
在本研究中,我们研究了右美托咪定(Dex)和磷酸肌酸(PCr)单独或联合应用对大鼠局灶性脑缺血再灌注损伤(I/R)模型的神经保护作用。脑中动脉腔内闭塞(MCAO)和再灌注诱导I/R。雄性sd大鼠随机分为Sham组和I/R组,I/R组再分为3个亚组:Dex (9 μg;kg-1 Dex), PCr (180 mg。kg-1 PCr)和Dex + PCr (9 μg。kg-1 Dex + 180 mg公斤PCr)。所有治疗均在再灌注开始时静脉给予。再灌注24小时后,测定神经功能缺损评分(NDS),并进行磁共振成像(MRI)扫描。测定血清丙二醛(MDA)和4-羟基壬烯醛(4-HNE)浓度,并用三苯基四氯化氮(TTC)染色估计脑梗死体积。采用光学和电子显微镜观察血脑屏障、神经元和线粒体损伤情况。采用双裂caspase-3和NeuN免疫荧光染色进一步评估神经元损伤。与I/R组比较,Dex和PCr可显著降低大鼠神经功能缺损评分(P < 0.01)、梗死面积(P < 0.01)及脑血屏障、神经元和线粒体损伤。氧化应激水平(P < 0.001)和神经元损伤水平(P < 0.001)降低,存活神经元增加(P < 0.001)。与Dex或PCr单独治疗相比,联合治疗的总体效果更大(P < 0.05)。这些结果表明,右美托咪唑或PCr治疗后可减少局灶性脑I/R损伤,并且这些药物联合使用比单独使用具有更大的保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Histochemica Et Cytochemica
Acta Histochemica Et Cytochemica 生物-细胞生物学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Histochemica et Cytochemica is the official online journal of the Japan Society of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. It is intended primarily for rapid publication of concise, original articles in the fields of histochemistry and cytochemistry. Manuscripts oriented towards methodological subjects that contain significant technical advances in these fields are also welcome. Manuscripts in English are accepted from investigators in any country, whether or not they are members of the Japan Society of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. Manuscripts should be original work that has not been previously published and is not being considered for publication elsewhere, with the exception of abstracts. Manuscripts with essentially the same content as a paper that has been published or accepted, or is under consideration for publication, will not be considered. All submitted papers will be peer-reviewed by at least two referees selected by an appropriate Associate Editor. Acceptance is based on scientific significance, originality, and clarity. When required, a revised manuscript should be submitted within 3 months, otherwise it will be considered to be a new submission. The Editor-in-Chief will make all final decisions regarding acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信