Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Seyedeh Mahsa Poormoosavi, Mohammad Amin Behmanesh, Sara Aryannejad, Sima Janati
{"title":"Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Seyedeh Mahsa Poormoosavi,&nbsp;Mohammad Amin Behmanesh,&nbsp;Sara Aryannejad,&nbsp;Sima Janati","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in cell culture media have led to a trend of embryo transfer from the early cleavage stages to blastocyst stage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to compare the effects of fresh embryo transfer in cleavage and blastocyst stage on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1422 cases referred to the Umm-al-Banin Infertility Clinic Center, Dezful, Iran, between July 2013 and December 2020 who were candidates for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fresh embryo transfer. A total of 1246 cases were divided into 4 categories on days 2-5 or 6. Chemical and clinical pregnancy, abortion, multifetal pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fresh embryo transfer was performed in 28.5% of the cases on the 2<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>nd</mtext></msup></math> day, 45.8% on the 3<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>rd</mtext></msup></math>, 15.3% on the 4<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>th</mtext></msup></math> day, and 10.4% on days 5 or 6. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were estimated at 20.6% and 17.6% in the cleavage, and 17% and 14% in the blastocyst stages, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed in either group. In addition, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of the abortion, multifetal pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rate (p <math><mo>></mo></math> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, the consequences of pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage were not superior to embryo transfer at different stages of the cleavage process.</p>","PeriodicalId":14386,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","volume":"21 5","pages":"425-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advances in cell culture media have led to a trend of embryo transfer from the early cleavage stages to blastocyst stage.

Objective: The study aims to compare the effects of fresh embryo transfer in cleavage and blastocyst stage on pregnancy outcomes.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1422 cases referred to the Umm-al-Banin Infertility Clinic Center, Dezful, Iran, between July 2013 and December 2020 who were candidates for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fresh embryo transfer. A total of 1246 cases were divided into 4 categories on days 2-5 or 6. Chemical and clinical pregnancy, abortion, multifetal pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed.

Results: Fresh embryo transfer was performed in 28.5% of the cases on the 2nd day, 45.8% on the 3rd, 15.3% on the 4th day, and 10.4% on days 5 or 6. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were estimated at 20.6% and 17.6% in the cleavage, and 17% and 14% in the blastocyst stages, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed in either group. In addition, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of the abortion, multifetal pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rate (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: According to the results, the consequences of pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage were not superior to embryo transfer at different stages of the cleavage process.

卵裂和囊胚期的新鲜胚胎移植与妊娠结局:一项回顾性横断面研究。
背景:细胞培养基的进步导致胚胎从早期卵裂阶段转移到囊胚阶段。目的:比较卵裂期和囊胚期新鲜胚胎移植对妊娠结局的影响。材料与方法:本横断面研究于2013年7月至2020年12月在伊朗Dezful Umm-al-Banin不孕不育临床中心进行的1422例体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射用于新鲜胚胎移植的候诊患者。1246例于第2 ~ 5天、第6天分为4类。分析化学妊娠、临床妊娠、流产、多胎妊娠、持续妊娠和活产率。结果:第2天新鲜胚胎移植率为28.5%,第3天为45.8%,第4天为15.3%,第5、6天为10.4%。总体临床妊娠率和活产率在卵裂期分别为20.6%和17.6%,在囊胚期分别为17%和14%。然而,两组间均无显著差异。流产率、多胎妊娠率、持续妊娠率组间比较差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:根据实验结果,囊胚期新鲜胚胎移植对妊娠的影响并不优于卵裂过程不同阶段的胚胎移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM), formerly published as "Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine (ISSN: 1680-6433)", is an international monthly scientific journal for who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. This journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Photo Clinics, and Letters to the Editor in the fields of fertility and infertility, ethical and social issues of assisted reproductive technologies, cellular and molecular biology of reproduction including the development of gametes and early embryos, assisted reproductive technologies in model system and in a clinical environment, reproductive endocrinology, andrology, epidemiology, pathology, genetics, oncology, surgery, psychology, and physiology. Emerging topics including cloning and stem cells are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信