Comparison of microbiological profile of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) isolates from subjects with colorectal cancer (CRC) or intestinal pre-cancerous lesions versus healthy individuals and evaluation of environmental factors involved in intestinal dysbiosis

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Patrizia Spigaglia , Fabrizio Barbanti , Elena Angela Pia Germinario , Enrico Maria Criscuolo , Giovanni Bruno , Lupe Sanchez-Mete , Barbara Porowska , Vittoria Stigliano , Fabio Accarpio , Andrea Oddi , Ilaria Zingale , Silvia Rossi , Roberta De Angelis , Alessia Fabbri
{"title":"Comparison of microbiological profile of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) isolates from subjects with colorectal cancer (CRC) or intestinal pre-cancerous lesions versus healthy individuals and evaluation of environmental factors involved in intestinal dysbiosis","authors":"Patrizia Spigaglia ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Barbanti ,&nbsp;Elena Angela Pia Germinario ,&nbsp;Enrico Maria Criscuolo ,&nbsp;Giovanni Bruno ,&nbsp;Lupe Sanchez-Mete ,&nbsp;Barbara Porowska ,&nbsp;Vittoria Stigliano ,&nbsp;Fabio Accarpio ,&nbsp;Andrea Oddi ,&nbsp;Ilaria Zingale ,&nbsp;Silvia Rossi ,&nbsp;Roberta De Angelis ,&nbsp;Alessia Fabbri","doi":"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to analyze enterotoxigenic <span><em>Bacteroides fragilis</em></span><span> (ETBF) isolates from colorectal biopsies of subjects with a histological analysis positive for colorectal cancer (CRC), pre-cancerous lesions (pre-CRC) or with a healthy intestinal tissue and to evaluate the environmental factors<span> that may not only concur to CRC development but may also affect gut microbiota composition.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>ETBF isolates were typed using the ERIC-PCR method, while PCR assays were performed to investigate the <em>bft</em> alleles, the <em>B. fragilis</em><span> pathogenicity island (BFPAI) region and the </span><em>cepA, cfiA</em> and <em>cfxA</em><span> genes. Susceptibility to antibiotics was tested using the agar dilution<span> method. Environmental factors that could play a role in promoting intestinal dysbiosis were evaluated throughout a questionnaire administered to the subjects enrolled.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six different ERIC-PCR types were identified. The type denominated C in this study was the most prevalent, in particular among the biopsies of subjects with pre-CRC, while an isolate belonging to a different type, denominated F, was detected in a biopsy from a subject with CRC. All the ETBF isolates from pre-CRC or CRC subjects had a <em>B. fragilis</em> pathogenicity island (BFPAI) region pattern I, while those from healthy individuals showed also different patterns. Furthermore, 71% of isolates from subjects with pre-CRC or CRC were resistant to two or more classes of antibiotics vs 43% of isolates from healthy individuals. The <em>B. fragilis</em><span> toxin BFT1 was the most frequently detected in this study, confirming the constant circulation of this isoform strains in Italy. Interestingly, BFT1 was found in 86% of the ETBF isolates from patients with CRC or pre-CRC, while the BFT2 was prevalent among the ETBF isolates from healthy subjects. No substantial differences based on sex, age, tobacco and alcohol consumption were observed between healthy and non-healthy individuals included in this study, while most of the subjects with CRC or pre-CRC lesions were subjected to pharmacological therapy (71%) and showed a body mass index (BMI) that falls within the overweight range (86%).</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our data suggest that some types of ETBF seem to better adapt and colonize the human gut and that the selective pressure exerted by factors related to lifestyle, such as pharmacological therapy and weight, could facilitate their persistence in the gut and their possible involvement in CRC development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996423000665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) isolates from colorectal biopsies of subjects with a histological analysis positive for colorectal cancer (CRC), pre-cancerous lesions (pre-CRC) or with a healthy intestinal tissue and to evaluate the environmental factors that may not only concur to CRC development but may also affect gut microbiota composition.

Methods

ETBF isolates were typed using the ERIC-PCR method, while PCR assays were performed to investigate the bft alleles, the B. fragilis pathogenicity island (BFPAI) region and the cepA, cfiA and cfxA genes. Susceptibility to antibiotics was tested using the agar dilution method. Environmental factors that could play a role in promoting intestinal dysbiosis were evaluated throughout a questionnaire administered to the subjects enrolled.

Results

Six different ERIC-PCR types were identified. The type denominated C in this study was the most prevalent, in particular among the biopsies of subjects with pre-CRC, while an isolate belonging to a different type, denominated F, was detected in a biopsy from a subject with CRC. All the ETBF isolates from pre-CRC or CRC subjects had a B. fragilis pathogenicity island (BFPAI) region pattern I, while those from healthy individuals showed also different patterns. Furthermore, 71% of isolates from subjects with pre-CRC or CRC were resistant to two or more classes of antibiotics vs 43% of isolates from healthy individuals. The B. fragilis toxin BFT1 was the most frequently detected in this study, confirming the constant circulation of this isoform strains in Italy. Interestingly, BFT1 was found in 86% of the ETBF isolates from patients with CRC or pre-CRC, while the BFT2 was prevalent among the ETBF isolates from healthy subjects. No substantial differences based on sex, age, tobacco and alcohol consumption were observed between healthy and non-healthy individuals included in this study, while most of the subjects with CRC or pre-CRC lesions were subjected to pharmacological therapy (71%) and showed a body mass index (BMI) that falls within the overweight range (86%).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that some types of ETBF seem to better adapt and colonize the human gut and that the selective pressure exerted by factors related to lifestyle, such as pharmacological therapy and weight, could facilitate their persistence in the gut and their possible involvement in CRC development.

来自结直肠癌CRC)或肠道癌前病变受试者与健康个体的产肠毒素脆弱拟杆菌(ETBF)分离株的微生物特征比较,以及肠道微生态失调相关环境因素的评估。
目的:本研究旨在分析组织学分析为结直肠癌癌症(CRC)阳性的受试者结直肠癌活检中的产肠毒素脆弱拟杆菌(ETBF)分离株,癌前病变(pre-CRC)或健康肠道组织,并评估不仅可能与CRC发展一致而且可能影响肠道微生物群组成的环境因素。方法:采用ERIC-PCR方法对ETBF分离株进行分型,同时用PCR方法检测bft等位基因、脆弱性芽孢杆菌致病岛区(BFPAI)和cepA、cfiA和cfxA基因。使用琼脂稀释法检测对抗生素的敏感性。在对入选受试者进行的问卷调查中,对可能在促进肠道微生态失调中发挥作用的环境因素进行了评估。结果:鉴定出6种不同的ERIC-PCR类型。在这项研究中,C型是最普遍的,特别是在CRC前期受试者的活检中,而在CRC受试者活检中检测到一种属于不同类型的分离物,命名为F。来自CRC前期或CRC受试者的所有ETBF分离株都具有脆弱性芽孢杆菌致病岛(BFPAI)区域模式I,而来自健康个体的ETBF分离物也显示出不同的模式。此外,来自CRC前期或CRC受试者的71%的分离株对两类或两类以上抗生素具有耐药性,而来自健康个体的分离株为43%。脆弱芽孢杆菌毒素BFT1是本研究中最常检测到的毒素,证实了该同种型菌株在意大利的持续循环。有趣的是,在来自CRC或CRC前期患者的86%的ETBF分离株中发现了BFT1,而BFT2在来自健康受试者的ETBF隔离株中普遍存在。在纳入本研究的健康和非健康个体之间,未观察到基于性别、年龄、吸烟和饮酒的显著差异,而大多数患有CRC或CRC前期病变的受试者都接受了药物治疗(71%),并显示出体重指数(BMI)在超重范围内(86%)。结论:我们的数据表明,某些类型的ETBF似乎更好地适应和定植于人类肠道,药物治疗和体重等因素可以促进它们在肠道中的持久性以及它们可能参与CRC的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信