Intrapartum Oxygen for Fetal Resuscitation: State of the Science.

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Julia Burd, Nandini Raghuraman
{"title":"Intrapartum Oxygen for Fetal Resuscitation: State of the Science.","authors":"Julia Burd, Nandini Raghuraman","doi":"10.1007/s13669-023-00363-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding maternal oxygen supplementation for Category II fetal heart tracings (FHT) in labor. We aim to evaluate the theoretical rationale for oxygen administration, the clinical efficacy of supplemental oxygen, and the potential risks.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Maternal oxygen supplementation is an intrauterine resuscitation technique rooted in the theoretic rationale that hyperoxygenating the mother results in increased oxygen transfer to the fetus. However, recent data suggest otherwise. Randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of oxygen supplementation in labor suggest no improvement in umbilical cord gases or other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to room air. Two meta-analyses demonstrated that oxygen supplementation is not associated with an improvement in umbilical artery pH or reduction in cesarean delivery. Although we lack data on definitive clinical neonatal outcomes with this practice, there is some suggestion of adverse neonatal outcomes with excess in utero oxygen exposure, including lower umbilical artery pH.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite historic data suggesting the benefit of maternal oxygen supplementation in increasing fetal oxygenation, recent randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated a lack of efficacy of this practice and some suggestion of harm. This has led to conflicting national guidelines<i>.</i> Further research is needed on short- and long-term neonatal clinical outcomes following prolonged intrauterine oxygen exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":44726,"journal":{"name":"Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-023-00363-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding maternal oxygen supplementation for Category II fetal heart tracings (FHT) in labor. We aim to evaluate the theoretical rationale for oxygen administration, the clinical efficacy of supplemental oxygen, and the potential risks.

Recent findings: Maternal oxygen supplementation is an intrauterine resuscitation technique rooted in the theoretic rationale that hyperoxygenating the mother results in increased oxygen transfer to the fetus. However, recent data suggest otherwise. Randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of oxygen supplementation in labor suggest no improvement in umbilical cord gases or other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to room air. Two meta-analyses demonstrated that oxygen supplementation is not associated with an improvement in umbilical artery pH or reduction in cesarean delivery. Although we lack data on definitive clinical neonatal outcomes with this practice, there is some suggestion of adverse neonatal outcomes with excess in utero oxygen exposure, including lower umbilical artery pH.

Summary: Despite historic data suggesting the benefit of maternal oxygen supplementation in increasing fetal oxygenation, recent randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated a lack of efficacy of this practice and some suggestion of harm. This has led to conflicting national guidelines. Further research is needed on short- and long-term neonatal clinical outcomes following prolonged intrauterine oxygen exposure.

用于胎儿复苏的产后氧气:科学现状。
综述目的:本综述旨在总结分娩时母体为II类胎心追踪(FHT)补充氧气的最新证据。我们的目的是评估吸氧的理论基础、补充氧气的临床疗效和潜在风险。最近的研究结果:母亲补充氧气是一种宫内复苏技术,其理论基础是给母亲脱氧会增加向胎儿的氧气输送。然而,最近的数据表明情况并非如此。分娩时补充氧气效果的随机对照试验表明,与室内空气相比,脐带气体或其他不利的孕产妇和新生儿结局没有改善。两项荟萃分析表明,补充氧气与脐动脉pH值的改善或剖宫产的减少无关。尽管我们缺乏关于这种做法的确切临床新生儿结局的数据,但有一些迹象表明,宫内氧气暴露过多会导致新生儿的不良结局,包括脐动脉pH值降低。总结:尽管历史数据表明,母体补充氧气有助于增加胎儿氧合,最近的随机试验和荟萃分析表明,这种做法缺乏疗效,也有一些危害。这导致了相互矛盾的国家指导方针。需要进一步研究长期宫内氧气暴露后新生儿的短期和长期临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: This journal aims to provide expert review articles on significant recent developments in obstetrics and gynecology. Presented in clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of conditions that compromise the health of women. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as endometriosis, infertility, menopause, prenatal medicine, and vulval and cervical lesions. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An Editorial Board of nearly 20 international members reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special importance to their country/region, and ensures that topics include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信