Olfactory Cleft Length: A Possible Risk Factor for Persistent Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Francisco Alves de Sousa, João Tarrio, André Sousa Machado, Joana Raquel Costa, Catarina Pinto, Ana Nóbrega Pinto, Bruno Moreira, Luís Meireles
{"title":"Olfactory Cleft Length: A Possible Risk Factor for Persistent Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction.","authors":"Francisco Alves de Sousa,&nbsp;João Tarrio,&nbsp;André Sousa Machado,&nbsp;Joana Raquel Costa,&nbsp;Catarina Pinto,&nbsp;Ana Nóbrega Pinto,&nbsp;Bruno Moreira,&nbsp;Luís Meireles","doi":"10.1159/000527141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To date, little is known about predisposing factors for persistent COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction (pCIOD). The objective was to determine whether olfactory cleft (OC) measurements associate with pCIOD risk.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Three subgroups were recruited: group A included patients with pCIOD, group B included patients without olfactory dysfunction following SARS-CoV-2 infection (ntCIOD), and group C consisted in controls without past history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (noCOVID-19). Olfactory perception threshold (OPT) and visual analog scale for olfactory impairment (VAS-olf) were obtained. OC measurements were obtained through computed tomography scans. Results were subsequently compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 patients with a mean age of 39 ± 10 years were included. OPT was significantly lower in pCIOD patients (group A: 4.2 ± 2.1 vs. group B: 12.3 ± 1.8 and group C: 12.2 ± 1.5, p < 0.001). VAS-olf was significantly higher in pCIOD (group A: 6 ± 2.6 vs. group B: 1.7 ± 1.6 and group C: 1.6 ± 1.5, p < 0.001). OC length was significantly higher in group A (42.8 ± 4.6) compared to group B (39.7 ± 3.4, p = 0.047) and C (39.8 ± 4, p = 0.037). The odd of pCIOD occurring after COVID-19 infection increased by 21% (95% CI [0.981, 1.495]) for a one unit (mm) increase in OC length. The odd of pCIOD occurring was 6.9 times higher when OC length >40 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longer OC may be a predisposing factor for pCIOD. This study is expected to encourage further research on OC morphology and its impact on olfactory disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":49717,"journal":{"name":"Orl-Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"85 3","pages":"119-127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9747724/pdf/orl-0001.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orl-Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To date, little is known about predisposing factors for persistent COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction (pCIOD). The objective was to determine whether olfactory cleft (OC) measurements associate with pCIOD risk.

Material and methods: Three subgroups were recruited: group A included patients with pCIOD, group B included patients without olfactory dysfunction following SARS-CoV-2 infection (ntCIOD), and group C consisted in controls without past history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (noCOVID-19). Olfactory perception threshold (OPT) and visual analog scale for olfactory impairment (VAS-olf) were obtained. OC measurements were obtained through computed tomography scans. Results were subsequently compared.

Results: A total of 55 patients with a mean age of 39 ± 10 years were included. OPT was significantly lower in pCIOD patients (group A: 4.2 ± 2.1 vs. group B: 12.3 ± 1.8 and group C: 12.2 ± 1.5, p < 0.001). VAS-olf was significantly higher in pCIOD (group A: 6 ± 2.6 vs. group B: 1.7 ± 1.6 and group C: 1.6 ± 1.5, p < 0.001). OC length was significantly higher in group A (42.8 ± 4.6) compared to group B (39.7 ± 3.4, p = 0.047) and C (39.8 ± 4, p = 0.037). The odd of pCIOD occurring after COVID-19 infection increased by 21% (95% CI [0.981, 1.495]) for a one unit (mm) increase in OC length. The odd of pCIOD occurring was 6.9 times higher when OC length >40 mm.

Conclusion: Longer OC may be a predisposing factor for pCIOD. This study is expected to encourage further research on OC morphology and its impact on olfactory disorders.

嗅裂长度:covid -19后持续嗅觉功能障碍的可能危险因素
迄今为止,对持续的covid -19诱导的嗅觉功能障碍(pCIOD)的易感因素知之甚少。目的是确定嗅裂(OC)测量是否与pCIOD风险相关。材料与方法:招募3个亚组:A组为pCIOD患者,B组为SARS-CoV-2感染后无嗅觉功能障碍患者(ntCIOD), C组为无SARS-CoV-2感染史的对照组(noCOVID-19)。获得嗅觉知觉阈值(OPT)和视觉模拟嗅觉障碍量表(VAS-olf)。通过计算机断层扫描获得OC测量值。随后对结果进行比较。结果:共纳入55例患者,平均年龄39±10岁。pCIOD患者的OPT明显低于对照组(A组:4.2±2.1,B组:12.3±1.8,C组:12.2±1.5,p < 0.001)。pCIOD患者VAS-olf明显升高(A组为6±2.6,B组为1.7±1.6,C组为1.6±1.5,p < 0.001)。A组OC长度(42.8±4.6)明显高于B组(39.7±3.4,p = 0.047)和C组(39.8±4,p = 0.037)。每增加1个单位(mm), COVID-19感染后发生pCIOD的几率增加21% (95% CI[0.981, 1.495])。当OC长度>40 mm时,发生pCIOD的几率高6.9倍。结论:OC长度较长可能是pCIOD的易感因素。该研究有望促进对OC形态及其对嗅觉障碍影响的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''ORL'' contains concise, original scientific papers of interest for both clinicians and researchers in oto-rhino-laryngology and head and neck surgery. Contributions drawn from the basic sciences cover new knowledge on the anatomy, pathology, pathophysiology, immunology and tumor biology of head and neck and the auditory and vestibular system, the salivary glands, paranasal sinuses and of the organs of the upper respiratory and digestive tract. The practical value of the journal is accentuated by reports of clinical progress in diagnosis and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书