Two-stage hepatectomy in resection of colorectal liver metastases - a single-institution experience with case-control matching and review of the literature.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Spela Turk, Irena Plahuta, Tomislav Magdalenic, Tajda Spanring, Kevin Laufer, Zan Mavc, Stojan Potrc, Arpad Ivanecz
{"title":"Two-stage hepatectomy in resection of colorectal liver metastases - a single-institution experience with case-control matching and review of the literature.","authors":"Spela Turk,&nbsp;Irena Plahuta,&nbsp;Tomislav Magdalenic,&nbsp;Tajda Spanring,&nbsp;Kevin Laufer,&nbsp;Zan Mavc,&nbsp;Stojan Potrc,&nbsp;Arpad Ivanecz","doi":"10.2478/raon-2023-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) has been proposed for patients with bilateral liver tumours who have a high risk of posthepatectomy liver failure after one-stage hepatectomy (OSH). This study aimed to determine the outcomes of TSH for extensive bilateral colorectal liver metastases.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of liver resections for colorectal liver metastases was conducted. The TSH group was compared to the OSH group in terms of perioperative outcomes and survival. Case-control matching was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 632 consecutive liver resections for colorectal liver metastases were performed between 2000 and 2020. The study group (TSH group) consisted of 15 patients who completed TSH. The control group included 151 patients who underwent OSH. The case-control matching-OSH group consisted of 14 patients. The major morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were 40% and 13.3% in the TSH group, 20.5% and 4.6% in the OSH group and 28.6% and 7.1% in the case-control matching-OSH group, respectively. The recurrence-free survival, median overall survival, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 5 months, 21 months, 33% and 13% in the TSH group; 11 months, 35 months, 49% and 27% in the OSH group; and 8 months, 23 months, 36% and 21%, respectively, in the case-control matching-OSH group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TSH used to be a favourable therapeutic choice in a select population of patients. Now, OSH should be preferred whenever feasible because it has lower morbidity and equivalent oncological outcomes to those of completed TSH.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"57 2","pages":"270-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286885/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) has been proposed for patients with bilateral liver tumours who have a high risk of posthepatectomy liver failure after one-stage hepatectomy (OSH). This study aimed to determine the outcomes of TSH for extensive bilateral colorectal liver metastases.

Patients and methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of liver resections for colorectal liver metastases was conducted. The TSH group was compared to the OSH group in terms of perioperative outcomes and survival. Case-control matching was performed.

Results: A total of 632 consecutive liver resections for colorectal liver metastases were performed between 2000 and 2020. The study group (TSH group) consisted of 15 patients who completed TSH. The control group included 151 patients who underwent OSH. The case-control matching-OSH group consisted of 14 patients. The major morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were 40% and 13.3% in the TSH group, 20.5% and 4.6% in the OSH group and 28.6% and 7.1% in the case-control matching-OSH group, respectively. The recurrence-free survival, median overall survival, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 5 months, 21 months, 33% and 13% in the TSH group; 11 months, 35 months, 49% and 27% in the OSH group; and 8 months, 23 months, 36% and 21%, respectively, in the case-control matching-OSH group, respectively.

Conclusions: TSH used to be a favourable therapeutic choice in a select population of patients. Now, OSH should be preferred whenever feasible because it has lower morbidity and equivalent oncological outcomes to those of completed TSH.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两期肝切除术切除结直肠肝转移-单机构病例对照对照经验和文献回顾。
背景:两期肝切除术(TSH)已被提议用于双侧肝肿瘤患者,这些患者在一期肝切除术(OSH)后肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的风险很高。本研究旨在确定TSH治疗广泛双侧结直肠肝转移的结果。患者和方法:对前瞻性维护的结直肠肝转移肝切除数据库进行了回顾性审查。比较TSH组和OSH组围手术期预后和生存率。进行病例-对照匹配。结果:2000年至2020年间,共进行了632例结直肠肝转移患者的连续肝切除术。研究组(TSH组)由15例完成TSH治疗的患者组成。对照组包括151例行职业安全健康手术的患者。病例-对照匹配- osh组14例。TSH组的主要发病率和90天死亡率分别为40%和13.3%,OSH组为20.5%和4.6%,病例-对照匹配OSH组为28.6%和7.1%。TSH组无复发生存期、中位总生存期、3年和5年生存率分别为5个月、21个月、33%和13%;职业安全与卫生组分别为11个月、35个月、49%和27%;8个月,23个月,36%和21%,分别为病例-对照匹配- osh组。结论:TSH曾经是一种有利的治疗选择,在特定人群的患者。现在,只要可行,应该优先选择职业安全卫生,因为它具有较低的发病率和与完成TSH相当的肿瘤结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信