A Reduction of Transcriptional Regulation in Aquatic Oligotrophic Microorganisms Enhances Fitness in Nutrient-Poor Environments.

IF 8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews Pub Date : 2023-06-28 Epub Date: 2023-03-30 DOI:10.1128/mmbr.00124-22
Stephen E Noell, Ferdi L Hellweger, Ben Temperton, Stephen J Giovannoni
{"title":"A Reduction of Transcriptional Regulation in Aquatic Oligotrophic Microorganisms Enhances Fitness in Nutrient-Poor Environments.","authors":"Stephen E Noell, Ferdi L Hellweger, Ben Temperton, Stephen J Giovannoni","doi":"10.1128/mmbr.00124-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this review, we consider the regulatory strategies of aquatic oligotrophs, microbial cells that are adapted to thrive under low-nutrient concentrations in oceans, lakes, and other aquatic ecosystems. Many reports have concluded that oligotrophs use less transcriptional regulation than copiotrophic cells, which are adapted to high nutrient concentrations and are far more common subjects for laboratory investigations of regulation. It is theorized that oligotrophs have retained alternate mechanisms of regulation, such as riboswitches, that provide shorter response times and smaller amplitude responses and require fewer cellular resources. We examine the accumulated evidence for distinctive regulatory strategies in oligotrophs. We explore differences in the selective pressures copiotrophs and oligotrophs encounter and ask why, although evolutionary history gives copiotrophs and oligotrophs access to the same regulatory mechanisms, they might exhibit distinctly different patterns in how these mechanisms are used. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding broad patterns in the evolution of microbial regulatory networks and their relationships to environmental niche and life history strategy. We ask whether these observations, which have emerged from a decade of increased investigation of the cell biology of oligotrophs, might be relevant to recent discoveries of many microbial cell lineages in nature that share with oligotrophs the property of reduced genome size.</p>","PeriodicalId":18520,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","volume":"87 2","pages":"e0012422"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00124-22","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this review, we consider the regulatory strategies of aquatic oligotrophs, microbial cells that are adapted to thrive under low-nutrient concentrations in oceans, lakes, and other aquatic ecosystems. Many reports have concluded that oligotrophs use less transcriptional regulation than copiotrophic cells, which are adapted to high nutrient concentrations and are far more common subjects for laboratory investigations of regulation. It is theorized that oligotrophs have retained alternate mechanisms of regulation, such as riboswitches, that provide shorter response times and smaller amplitude responses and require fewer cellular resources. We examine the accumulated evidence for distinctive regulatory strategies in oligotrophs. We explore differences in the selective pressures copiotrophs and oligotrophs encounter and ask why, although evolutionary history gives copiotrophs and oligotrophs access to the same regulatory mechanisms, they might exhibit distinctly different patterns in how these mechanisms are used. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding broad patterns in the evolution of microbial regulatory networks and their relationships to environmental niche and life history strategy. We ask whether these observations, which have emerged from a decade of increased investigation of the cell biology of oligotrophs, might be relevant to recent discoveries of many microbial cell lineages in nature that share with oligotrophs the property of reduced genome size.

减少水生低营养微生物的转录调控可增强其在营养贫乏环境中的生存能力。
在这篇综述中,我们探讨了水生寡养微生物的调控策略,这些微生物细胞适应于在海洋、湖泊和其他水生生态系统的低营养浓度条件下生长。许多报告都认为,寡养微生物使用的转录调控比共养细胞少,而共养细胞适应高营养浓度,是更常见的实验室调控研究对象。据推测,寡养细胞保留了核糖开关等替代调控机制,这些机制可提供较短的反应时间和较小的反应幅度,并需要较少的细胞资源。我们研究了寡养动物独特调控策略的累积证据。我们探讨了共养生物和寡养生物所遇到的选择性压力的差异,并提出了一个问题:尽管进化史赋予了共养生物和寡养生物使用相同调控机制的机会,但它们在如何使用这些机制方面却可能表现出截然不同的模式。我们讨论了这些发现对于理解微生物调控网络进化的广泛模式及其与环境生态位和生活史策略的关系的意义。我们提出的问题是,这些观察结果是否与最近在自然界中发现的许多微生物细胞系有关,这些微生物细胞系与寡养微生物一样具有基因组大小减小的特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews (MMBR), a journal that explores the significance and interrelationships of recent discoveries in various microbiology fields, publishes review articles that help both specialists and nonspecialists understand and apply the latest findings in their own research. MMBR covers a wide range of topics in microbiology, including microbial ecology, evolution, parasitology, biotechnology, and immunology. The journal caters to scientists with diverse interests in all areas of microbial science and encompasses viruses, bacteria, archaea, fungi, unicellular eukaryotes, and microbial parasites. MMBR primarily publishes authoritative and critical reviews that push the boundaries of knowledge, appealing to both specialists and generalists. The journal often includes descriptive figures and tables to enhance understanding. Indexed/Abstracted in various databases such as Agricola, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Service, Current Contents- Life Sciences, EMBASE, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, Illustrata, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), Summon, and Scopus, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信