The relation of representational competence and conceptual knowledge in female and male undergraduates.

IF 5.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
International Journal of Stem Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1186/s40594-023-00435-6
Peter A Edelsbrunner, Sarah Malone, Sarah I Hofer, Stefan Küchemann, Jochen Kuhn, Roman Schmid, Kristin Altmeyer, Roland Brünken, Andreas Lichtenberger
{"title":"The relation of representational competence and conceptual knowledge in female and male undergraduates.","authors":"Peter A Edelsbrunner,&nbsp;Sarah Malone,&nbsp;Sarah I Hofer,&nbsp;Stefan Küchemann,&nbsp;Jochen Kuhn,&nbsp;Roman Schmid,&nbsp;Kristin Altmeyer,&nbsp;Roland Brünken,&nbsp;Andreas Lichtenberger","doi":"10.1186/s40594-023-00435-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Representational competence is commonly considered a prerequisite for the acquisition of conceptual knowledge, yet little exploration has been undertaken into the relation between these two constructs. Using an assessment instrument of representational competence with vector fields that functions without confounding topical context, we examined its relation with <i>N</i> = 515 undergraduates' conceptual knowledge about electromagnetism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying latent variable modeling, we found that students' representational competence and conceptual knowledge are related yet clearly distinguishable constructs (manifest correlation: <i>r</i> = .54; latent correlation: <i>r</i> = .71). The relation was weaker for female than for male students, which could not be explained by measurement differences between the two groups. There were several students with high representational competence and low conceptual knowledge, but only few students with low representational competence and high conceptual knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support the assumption that representational competence is a prerequisite, yet insufficient condition for the acquisition of conceptual knowledge. We provide suggestions for supporting learners in building representational competence, and particularly female learners in utilizing their representational competence to build conceptual knowledge.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40594-023-00435-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":48581,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stem Education","volume":"10 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285021/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stem Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00435-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Representational competence is commonly considered a prerequisite for the acquisition of conceptual knowledge, yet little exploration has been undertaken into the relation between these two constructs. Using an assessment instrument of representational competence with vector fields that functions without confounding topical context, we examined its relation with N = 515 undergraduates' conceptual knowledge about electromagnetism.

Results: Applying latent variable modeling, we found that students' representational competence and conceptual knowledge are related yet clearly distinguishable constructs (manifest correlation: r = .54; latent correlation: r = .71). The relation was weaker for female than for male students, which could not be explained by measurement differences between the two groups. There were several students with high representational competence and low conceptual knowledge, but only few students with low representational competence and high conceptual knowledge.

Conclusions: These results support the assumption that representational competence is a prerequisite, yet insufficient condition for the acquisition of conceptual knowledge. We provide suggestions for supporting learners in building representational competence, and particularly female learners in utilizing their representational competence to build conceptual knowledge.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40594-023-00435-6.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

男女大学生表征能力与概念知识的关系。
背景:代表能力通常被认为是获得概念知识的先决条件,但很少对这两个概念之间的关系进行探索。使用一种具有向量场的表征能力评估工具,该工具在不混淆主题上下文的情况下发挥作用,我们检验了它与N的关系 = 515名本科生的电磁学概念知识。结果:应用潜变量模型,我们发现学生的表征能力和概念知识是相关但可明确区分的结构(明显相关:r = .54;潜在相关性:r = .71)。女生的这种关系比男生弱,这不能用两组之间的测量差异来解释。有几名学生具有高表征能力和低概念知识,但只有少数学生具有低表征能力和高概念知识。结论:这些结果支持这样一种假设,即表征能力是获得概念知识的先决条件,但不充分。我们为支持学习者建立表征能力,特别是女性学习者利用其表征能力建立概念知识提供了建议。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1186/s40594-023-00435-6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stem Education
International Journal of Stem Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STEM Education is a multidisciplinary journal in subject-content education that focuses on the study of teaching and learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). It is being established as a brand new, forward looking journal in the field of education. As a peer-reviewed journal, it is positioned to promote research and educational development in the rapidly evolving field of STEM education around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信