The Road to Cognitive Skill Acquisition: Psychometric Evaluation of the Competencies of Cognitive Therapy Scale.

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
John F Buss, Lauren A Rutter, Jacqueline Howard, Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces
{"title":"The Road to Cognitive Skill Acquisition: Psychometric Evaluation of the Competencies of Cognitive Therapy Scale.","authors":"John F Buss,&nbsp;Lauren A Rutter,&nbsp;Jacqueline Howard,&nbsp;Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces","doi":"10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive therapy (CT) skills are an index of treatment progress. They predict changes in patients' acute depressive symptoms and symptom relapses. However, the psychometric properties of the various measures of CT skills are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Competencies of Cognitive Therapy Scale-Self Report (CCTS-SR) and assess its concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The psychometric properties of the CCTS-SR were explored by using data from a panel of online respondents (N=410). The fit of a one-factor solution was explored by using a confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory bifactor analyses (EBFA) were then conducted to determine other possible factor structures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-factor solution did not fit the data well. Results of the EBFA suggested that the factor structure of the CCTS-SR may be characterized by a single underlying dimension capturing the general use of CT skills as well as by more specific factors the authors labeled \"behavioral activation\" and \"CT comprehension.\" The variance captured by the factor initially labeled as CT comprehension was correlated with measures of depression and emotional dysregulation, suggesting that these items do not capture CT comprehension and should be removed from the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CCTS-SR seems to be characterized by more than a single factor, and items that seemingly compose CT comprehension (i.e., items 13 and 14) may need to be removed. Although the CCTS-SR may be a valid index of therapy progress, more attention needs to be paid to its psychometric properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":46822,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":"75 2","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119972/pdf/nihms-1888306.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive therapy (CT) skills are an index of treatment progress. They predict changes in patients' acute depressive symptoms and symptom relapses. However, the psychometric properties of the various measures of CT skills are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Competencies of Cognitive Therapy Scale-Self Report (CCTS-SR) and assess its concurrent validity.

Methods: The psychometric properties of the CCTS-SR were explored by using data from a panel of online respondents (N=410). The fit of a one-factor solution was explored by using a confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory bifactor analyses (EBFA) were then conducted to determine other possible factor structures.

Results: The one-factor solution did not fit the data well. Results of the EBFA suggested that the factor structure of the CCTS-SR may be characterized by a single underlying dimension capturing the general use of CT skills as well as by more specific factors the authors labeled "behavioral activation" and "CT comprehension." The variance captured by the factor initially labeled as CT comprehension was correlated with measures of depression and emotional dysregulation, suggesting that these items do not capture CT comprehension and should be removed from the scale.

Conclusions: The CCTS-SR seems to be characterized by more than a single factor, and items that seemingly compose CT comprehension (i.e., items 13 and 14) may need to be removed. Although the CCTS-SR may be a valid index of therapy progress, more attention needs to be paid to its psychometric properties.

Abstract Image

认知技能习得之路:认知治疗量表能力的心理测量评估。
目的:认知治疗(CT)技能是治疗进展的一个指标。它们预测了患者急性抑郁症状和症状复发的变化。然而,对各种CT技能测量的心理测量特性了解甚少。本研究旨在探讨认知治疗量表-自我报告(CCTS-SR)胜任力的因素结构,并评估其并发效度。方法:利用在线调查问卷(N=410)的数据,探讨CCTS-SR的心理测量特性。通过验证性因子分析探讨了单因素解的拟合性。然后进行探索性双因素分析(EBFA)以确定其他可能的因素结构。结果:单因素方案拟合效果不佳。EBFA的结果表明,CCTS-SR的因素结构可能具有单一的潜在维度,即捕获CT技能的一般使用,以及作者标记为“行为激活”和“CT理解”的更具体的因素。最初标记为CT理解的因素所捕获的方差与抑郁和情绪失调的测量相关,这表明这些项目不包含CT理解,应该从量表中删除。结论:CCTS-SR的特征似乎不止一个因素,似乎构成CT理解的项目(即项目13和14)可能需要删除。虽然CCTS-SR可能是治疗进展的有效指标,但其心理测量特性需要更多的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Founded in 1939, the American Journal of Psychotherapy (AJP) has long been a leader in the publication of eclectic articles for all psychotherapists. Transtheoretic in reach (offering information for psychotherapists across all theoretical foundations), the goal of AJP is to present an overview of the psychotherapies, subsuming a host of schools, techniques, and psychological modalities within the larger domain of clinical practice under broad themes including dynamic, behavioral, spiritual, and experiential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信