Ankle Audiometry: A Clinical Test for the Enhanced Hearing Sensitivity for Body Sounds in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Audiology and Neuro-Otology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1159/000528407
Luca Verrecchia, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson, Magnus Westin, Aleksandr Velikoselskii, Sabine Reinfeldt, Bo Håkansson
{"title":"Ankle Audiometry: A Clinical Test for the Enhanced Hearing Sensitivity for Body Sounds in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.","authors":"Luca Verrecchia, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson, Magnus Westin, Aleksandr Velikoselskii, Sabine Reinfeldt, Bo Håkansson","doi":"10.1159/000528407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop a clinical test for body sounds' hypersensitivity in superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Case-control study, 20 patients affected by SCDS and body sounds' hypersensitivity and 20 control matched subjects tested with a new test called ankle audiometry (AA). The AA consisted of a psychoacoustic hearing test in which the stimulus was substituted by a controlled bone vibration at 125, 250, 500, and 750 Hz, delivered at the medial malleolus by a steel spring-attached bone transducer prototype B250. For each subject, it was defined an index side (the other being non-index), the one with major symptoms in cases or best threshold for each tested frequency in controls. In 3 patients, the AA was measured before and after SCDS surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AA thresholds for index side were significantly lower in SCDS patients (115.6 ± 10.5 dB force level [FL]) than in control subjects (126.4 ± 8.56 dB FL). In particular, the largest difference was observed at 250 Hz (-16.5 dB). AA thresholds in patients were significantly lower at index side in comparison with non-index side (124.2 ± 11.4 dB FL). The response obtained with 250 Hz stimuli outperformed the other frequencies, in terms of diagnostic accuracy for SCDS. At specific thresholds' levels (120 dB FL), AA showed relevant sensitivity (90%) and specificity (80%) for SCDS. AA did not significantly correlate to other clinical markers of SCDS such as the bone and air conducted hearing thresholds and the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. The AA thresholds were significantly modified by surgical intervention, passing from 119.2 ± 9.7 to 130.4 ± 9.4 dB FL in 3 patients, following their relief in body sounds' hypersensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AA showed interesting diagnostic features in SCDS with significantly lower hearing thresholds in SCDS patients when compared to healthy matched subjects. Moreover, AA could identify the affected or more affected side in SCDS patients, with a significant threshold elevation after SCDS surgery, corresponding in body sounds' hypersensitivity relief. Clinically, AA may represent a first objective measure of body sounds' hypersensitivity in SCDS and, accordingly, be an accessible screening test for SCDS in not tertiary audiological centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop a clinical test for body sounds' hypersensitivity in superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS).

Method: Case-control study, 20 patients affected by SCDS and body sounds' hypersensitivity and 20 control matched subjects tested with a new test called ankle audiometry (AA). The AA consisted of a psychoacoustic hearing test in which the stimulus was substituted by a controlled bone vibration at 125, 250, 500, and 750 Hz, delivered at the medial malleolus by a steel spring-attached bone transducer prototype B250. For each subject, it was defined an index side (the other being non-index), the one with major symptoms in cases or best threshold for each tested frequency in controls. In 3 patients, the AA was measured before and after SCDS surgery.

Results: The AA thresholds for index side were significantly lower in SCDS patients (115.6 ± 10.5 dB force level [FL]) than in control subjects (126.4 ± 8.56 dB FL). In particular, the largest difference was observed at 250 Hz (-16.5 dB). AA thresholds in patients were significantly lower at index side in comparison with non-index side (124.2 ± 11.4 dB FL). The response obtained with 250 Hz stimuli outperformed the other frequencies, in terms of diagnostic accuracy for SCDS. At specific thresholds' levels (120 dB FL), AA showed relevant sensitivity (90%) and specificity (80%) for SCDS. AA did not significantly correlate to other clinical markers of SCDS such as the bone and air conducted hearing thresholds and the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. The AA thresholds were significantly modified by surgical intervention, passing from 119.2 ± 9.7 to 130.4 ± 9.4 dB FL in 3 patients, following their relief in body sounds' hypersensitivity.

Conclusion: AA showed interesting diagnostic features in SCDS with significantly lower hearing thresholds in SCDS patients when compared to healthy matched subjects. Moreover, AA could identify the affected or more affected side in SCDS patients, with a significant threshold elevation after SCDS surgery, corresponding in body sounds' hypersensitivity relief. Clinically, AA may represent a first objective measure of body sounds' hypersensitivity in SCDS and, accordingly, be an accessible screening test for SCDS in not tertiary audiological centers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

踝部听力测定:上腔开裂综合征体声听觉灵敏度增强的临床测试。
简介:本研究的目的是开发上耳道开裂综合征(SCDS)体音过敏的临床测试:本研究的目的是开发一种上耳道开裂综合征(SCDS)体音过敏的临床测试方法:方法:病例对照研究,20 名上腭管开裂综合征体声过敏症患者和 20 名匹配的对照受试者接受了一种名为踝部测听(AA)的新测试。踝部听力测试包括心理声学听力测试,其中的刺激由125、250、500和750赫兹的受控骨振动代替,由钢制弹簧连接骨传感器原型B250在内侧踝骨处进行。每个受试者都有一个指数侧(另一侧为非指数侧),即病例中出现主要症状的一侧或对照组中每个测试频率的最佳阈值。对 3 名患者在 SCDS 手术前后进行了 AA 测量:结果:SCDS 患者的指数侧 AA 阈值(115.6 ± 10.5 dB 力量水平 [FL])明显低于对照组(126.4 ± 8.56 dB FL)。特别是在 250 Hz(-16.5 dB)处观察到最大差异。与非指数侧相比,患者指数侧的 AA 阈值明显较低(124.2 ± 11.4 dB FL)。就 SCDS 的诊断准确性而言,250 Hz 刺激下获得的反应优于其他频率。在特定的阈值水平(120 dB FL)下,AA 对 SCDS 的灵敏度(90%)和特异度(80%)相关。AA 与 SCDS 的其他临床指标(如骨和空气传导听阈以及前庭诱发肌源性电位)无明显相关性。3名患者的AA阈值在手术干预后有了明显改变,从119.2 ± 9.7 dB FL提高到130.4 ± 9.4 dB FL,体音超敏症状得到缓解:结论:AA 在 SCDS 中显示出有趣的诊断特征,与健康匹配受试者相比,SCDS 患者的听阈明显较低。此外,AA 还能识别 SCDS 患者的受累侧或更受累侧,SCDS 手术后阈值明显升高,体音过敏症状也相应缓解。在临床上,AA可能代表了对SCDS患者体声超敏性的首次客观测量,因此,在非三级听力中心,AA可作为SCDS的筛查测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信