Mentoring in STEM higher education: a synthesis of the literature to (re)present the excluded women of color.

IF 5.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tara Nkrumah, Kimberly A Scott
{"title":"Mentoring in STEM higher education: a synthesis of the literature to (re)present the excluded women of color.","authors":"Tara Nkrumah,&nbsp;Kimberly A Scott","doi":"10.1186/s40594-022-00367-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mentoring initiatives for undergraduate and graduate women of color (WOC) have provided peer-to-peer relationships and counterspaces to disrupt the inequitable treatment of students in STEM higher education (HE). This literature synthesis explores intersectionality in STEM HE mentoring through pursuing the following research questions: (1) What impact do the social contexts of WOC have on their mentoring experiences in STEM HE? (2) What role does intersectionality play in the structural organization of WOC mentoring models in STEM HE? (3) How has intersectionality shaped the life experiences of WOC mentors and mentees? and (4) How can mentoring models utilize intersectionality to incorporate the experiences of WOC in STEM HE? Thematic findings from literature related to STEM HE mentoring suggest a reinforcement of deficit mentoring models (Fix the URM), a symbolic application of intersectionality (branding gender-race), and a lack of paradigmatic shifts (catch-all). Our specific recommendations presented in this article challenge the epistemic oppression and epistemic violence that current STEM HE mentoring models operationalize.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40594-022-00367-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":48581,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stem Education","volume":"9 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9336123/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stem Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00367-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mentoring initiatives for undergraduate and graduate women of color (WOC) have provided peer-to-peer relationships and counterspaces to disrupt the inequitable treatment of students in STEM higher education (HE). This literature synthesis explores intersectionality in STEM HE mentoring through pursuing the following research questions: (1) What impact do the social contexts of WOC have on their mentoring experiences in STEM HE? (2) What role does intersectionality play in the structural organization of WOC mentoring models in STEM HE? (3) How has intersectionality shaped the life experiences of WOC mentors and mentees? and (4) How can mentoring models utilize intersectionality to incorporate the experiences of WOC in STEM HE? Thematic findings from literature related to STEM HE mentoring suggest a reinforcement of deficit mentoring models (Fix the URM), a symbolic application of intersectionality (branding gender-race), and a lack of paradigmatic shifts (catch-all). Our specific recommendations presented in this article challenge the epistemic oppression and epistemic violence that current STEM HE mentoring models operationalize.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40594-022-00367-7.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

STEM高等教育中的辅导:综合文献来呈现被排斥的有色人种女性。
针对有色人种女性本科生和研究生的指导计划(WOC)提供了点对点关系和反击空间,以打破STEM高等教育(HE)中学生的不公平待遇。本文献综述通过以下研究问题探讨STEM高等教育指导中的交叉性:(1)WOC的社会背景对其STEM高等教育指导经历有何影响?(2)交叉性在STEM高等教育WOC指导模式的结构组织中起什么作用?(3)交叉性如何塑造WOC导师和学员的人生经历?(4)指导模式如何利用交叉性将WOC的经验融入STEM HE?与STEM高等教育指导相关的文献的主题研究结果表明,缺陷指导模型(修复URM)得到加强,交叉性的象征性应用(品牌化性别-种族)以及缺乏范式转变(全面)。我们在本文中提出的具体建议挑战了当前STEM HE指导模型操作的认知压迫和认知暴力。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1186/s40594-022-00367-7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stem Education
International Journal of Stem Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STEM Education is a multidisciplinary journal in subject-content education that focuses on the study of teaching and learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). It is being established as a brand new, forward looking journal in the field of education. As a peer-reviewed journal, it is positioned to promote research and educational development in the rapidly evolving field of STEM education around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信