Infectious disease burden in Gujarat (2005-2011): comparison of selected infectious disease rates with India.

Veena Iyer, Gulrez Shah Azhar, Nandini Choudhury, Vidwan Singh Dhruwey, Russell Dacombe, Ashish Upadhyay
{"title":"Infectious disease burden in Gujarat (2005-2011): comparison of selected infectious disease rates with India.","authors":"Veena Iyer,&nbsp;Gulrez Shah Azhar,&nbsp;Nandini Choudhury,&nbsp;Vidwan Singh Dhruwey,&nbsp;Russell Dacombe,&nbsp;Ashish Upadhyay","doi":"10.3402/ehtj.v7.22838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>India is known to be endemic to numerous infectious diseases. The infectious disease profile of India is changing due to increased human environmental interactions, urbanisation and climate change. There are also predictions of explosive growth in infectious and zoonotic diseases. The Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) was implemented in Gujarat in 2004.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed IDSP data on seven laboratory confirmed infectious diseases from 2005-2011 on temporal and spatial trends and compared this to the National Health Profile (NHP) data for the same period and with other literature. We chose laboratory cases data for Enteric fever, Cholera, Hepatitis, Dengue, Chikungunya, Measles and Diphtheria in the state since well designed vertical programs do not exist for these diseases. Statistical and GIS analysis was done using appropriate software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis shows that the existing surveillance system in the state is predominantly reporting urban cases. There are wide variations among reported cases within the state with reports of Enteric fever and Measles being less than half of the national average, while Cholera, Viral Hepatitis and Dengue being nearly double.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found some limitations in the IDSP system with regard to the number of reporting units and cases in the background of a mixed health system with multiplicity of treatment providers and payment mechanisms. Despite these limitations, IDSP can be strengthened into a comprehensive surveillance system capable of tackling the challenge of reversing the endemicity of these diseases and preventing the emergence of others.</p>","PeriodicalId":72898,"journal":{"name":"Emerging health threats journal","volume":"7 ","pages":"22838"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/ehtj.v7.22838","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging health threats journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v7.22838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: India is known to be endemic to numerous infectious diseases. The infectious disease profile of India is changing due to increased human environmental interactions, urbanisation and climate change. There are also predictions of explosive growth in infectious and zoonotic diseases. The Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) was implemented in Gujarat in 2004.

Methods: We analysed IDSP data on seven laboratory confirmed infectious diseases from 2005-2011 on temporal and spatial trends and compared this to the National Health Profile (NHP) data for the same period and with other literature. We chose laboratory cases data for Enteric fever, Cholera, Hepatitis, Dengue, Chikungunya, Measles and Diphtheria in the state since well designed vertical programs do not exist for these diseases. Statistical and GIS analysis was done using appropriate software.

Results: Our analysis shows that the existing surveillance system in the state is predominantly reporting urban cases. There are wide variations among reported cases within the state with reports of Enteric fever and Measles being less than half of the national average, while Cholera, Viral Hepatitis and Dengue being nearly double.

Conclusions: We found some limitations in the IDSP system with regard to the number of reporting units and cases in the background of a mixed health system with multiplicity of treatment providers and payment mechanisms. Despite these limitations, IDSP can be strengthened into a comprehensive surveillance system capable of tackling the challenge of reversing the endemicity of these diseases and preventing the emergence of others.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

古吉拉特邦传染病负担(2005-2011年):与印度选定传染病发病率的比较。
背景:众所周知,印度是许多传染病的地方病。由于人类与环境的相互作用增加、城市化和气候变化,印度的传染病状况正在发生变化。也有人预测传染病和人畜共患疾病会出现爆炸性增长。2004年在古吉拉特邦实施了综合疾病监测项目。方法:分析了2005-2011年7种实验室确诊传染病的IDSP数据的时空趋势,并将其与同期的国家卫生概况(NHP)数据和其他文献进行了比较。我们选择了该州的肠热病、霍乱、肝炎、登革热、基孔肯雅热、麻疹和白喉的实验室病例数据,因为没有针对这些疾病设计良好的垂直规划。采用相应的软件进行统计和GIS分析。结果:我们的分析表明,该州现有的监测系统主要报告城市病例。该州报告的病例差异很大,报告的肠热病和麻疹不到全国平均水平的一半,而霍乱、病毒性肝炎和登革热几乎是全国平均水平的两倍。结论:我们发现IDSP系统在具有多种治疗提供者和支付机制的混合卫生系统背景下,在报告单位和病例数量方面存在一些局限性。尽管存在这些限制,但可以将IDSP加强为一个全面的监测系统,能够应对扭转这些疾病流行和防止其他疾病出现的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信