Barriers and motivators to specializing in geriatrics and strategies for recruitment: Scoping review.

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-07-03 Epub Date: 2022-05-23 DOI:10.1080/02701960.2022.2078814
Kelly Cheung, Peter Tamura, Zeeshan Malik, Jason Lin, John Cyrus, Chuck Alexander, Sarah Hobgood
{"title":"Barriers and motivators to specializing in geriatrics and strategies for recruitment: Scoping review.","authors":"Kelly Cheung, Peter Tamura, Zeeshan Malik, Jason Lin, John Cyrus, Chuck Alexander, Sarah Hobgood","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2022.2078814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the barriers to specializing in geriatrics are known, motivators behind why medical trainees choose geriatrics are not as well understood. It is also unknown if recruitment strategies in the literature address these barriers and motivators. The aim of this systematic scoping review is to examine the current literature on recruitment strategies alongside motivators and barriers for specializing in geriatrics. Eligible articles for this scoping review either focused on motivators or barriers among trainees (medical students, resident-physicians, fellows) or recruitment strategies. A scoping search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO. Data was extracted on article characteristics and themes. 88 of 2064 articles were eligible and included. Personal fulfillment emerged as the most common theme for motivators, contrary to prior studies that cite positive role modeling. Financial disincentive remained the most common barrier, followed by limited exposure and \"futile\" practice. Promising interventions beyond financial compensation include defining geriatrics better, emphasizing the high job satisfaction rates, increasing clinical exposure for medical students, and additional funding for academic centers to recruit academic geriatricians. Policymakers and medical educators should consider multiple strategies that target the motivators, as well as the barriers to pursuing geriatrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":"44 3","pages":"396-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2022.2078814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the barriers to specializing in geriatrics are known, motivators behind why medical trainees choose geriatrics are not as well understood. It is also unknown if recruitment strategies in the literature address these barriers and motivators. The aim of this systematic scoping review is to examine the current literature on recruitment strategies alongside motivators and barriers for specializing in geriatrics. Eligible articles for this scoping review either focused on motivators or barriers among trainees (medical students, resident-physicians, fellows) or recruitment strategies. A scoping search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO. Data was extracted on article characteristics and themes. 88 of 2064 articles were eligible and included. Personal fulfillment emerged as the most common theme for motivators, contrary to prior studies that cite positive role modeling. Financial disincentive remained the most common barrier, followed by limited exposure and "futile" practice. Promising interventions beyond financial compensation include defining geriatrics better, emphasizing the high job satisfaction rates, increasing clinical exposure for medical students, and additional funding for academic centers to recruit academic geriatricians. Policymakers and medical educators should consider multiple strategies that target the motivators, as well as the barriers to pursuing geriatrics.

专门从事老年病学和招聘策略的障碍和激励因素:范围审查。
虽然专攻老年病学的障碍是众所周知的,但医疗学员选择老年病学背后的动机却不是很清楚。文献中的招聘策略是否解决了这些障碍和激励因素也是未知的。这一系统的范围审查的目的是检查当前的文献招聘策略与激励因素和障碍专门从事老年病学。纳入本综述的文章要么关注学员(医学生、住院医师、研究员)的激励因素或障碍,要么关注招聘策略。在MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL和PsychINFO中进行了范围搜索。提取文章特征和主题的数据。2064篇文章中有88篇符合条件并纳入。个人成就感成为激励因素最常见的主题,这与之前的研究引用积极的角色塑造相反。最常见的障碍仍然是经济上的抑制,其次是有限的曝光和“徒劳”的做法。除了经济补偿之外,有希望的干预措施包括更好地定义老年医学,强调高工作满意度,增加医学生的临床接触,以及为学术中心招聘学术老年医学专家提供额外资金。政策制定者和医学教育者应该考虑针对激励因素以及追求老年医学的障碍的多种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信