Caregiver Experiences Navigating the Diagnostic Journey in a Rapidly Progressing Dementia.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alissa Bernstein Sideman, Joni Gilissen, Krista L Harrison, Sarah B Garrett, Michael J Terranova, Christine S Ritchie, Michael D Geschwind
{"title":"Caregiver Experiences Navigating the Diagnostic Journey in a Rapidly Progressing Dementia.","authors":"Alissa Bernstein Sideman, Joni Gilissen, Krista L Harrison, Sarah B Garrett, Michael J Terranova, Christine S Ritchie, Michael D Geschwind","doi":"10.1177/08919887221135552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with suspected Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and their families experience a burdensome process while seeking a diagnosis. These challenges are problematic in the most common dementia syndromes, but they can be even more distressing in rarer, atypical syndromes such as rapidly progressive dementias (RPDs), which can be fatal within months from onset. This study is an examination of the diagnostic journey experience from the perspective of caregivers of people who died from the prototypic RPD, sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (sCJD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>eIn this mixed-methods study, qualitative data were drawn from interviews with former caregivers of 12 people who died from sCJD. Chart review data were drawn from research and clinical chart data about the person with sCJD. Data were analyzed by a multidisciplinary research team using qualitative and descriptive statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 4 overarching themes that characterized the experience of the diagnostic journey in sCJD: clinician knowledge, clinician communication, experiences of uncertainty, and the caregiver as advocate. We also identified 4 phases along the diagnostic journey: recognition, the diagnostic workup, diagnosis, and post-diagnosis. Sub-themes within each phase include struggles to recognize what is wrong, complex processes of testing and referrals, delay and disclosure of diagnosis, and access to resources post-diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that more work is needed to improve clinician diagnostic knowledge and communication practices. Furthermore, caregivers need better support during the diagnostic journey. What we learn from studying sCJD and other RPDs is likely applicable to other more common dementias.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":"36 4","pages":"282-294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887221135552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People with suspected Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and their families experience a burdensome process while seeking a diagnosis. These challenges are problematic in the most common dementia syndromes, but they can be even more distressing in rarer, atypical syndromes such as rapidly progressive dementias (RPDs), which can be fatal within months from onset. This study is an examination of the diagnostic journey experience from the perspective of caregivers of people who died from the prototypic RPD, sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (sCJD).

Methods: eIn this mixed-methods study, qualitative data were drawn from interviews with former caregivers of 12 people who died from sCJD. Chart review data were drawn from research and clinical chart data about the person with sCJD. Data were analyzed by a multidisciplinary research team using qualitative and descriptive statistical analysis.

Results: We identified 4 overarching themes that characterized the experience of the diagnostic journey in sCJD: clinician knowledge, clinician communication, experiences of uncertainty, and the caregiver as advocate. We also identified 4 phases along the diagnostic journey: recognition, the diagnostic workup, diagnosis, and post-diagnosis. Sub-themes within each phase include struggles to recognize what is wrong, complex processes of testing and referrals, delay and disclosure of diagnosis, and access to resources post-diagnosis.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that more work is needed to improve clinician diagnostic knowledge and communication practices. Furthermore, caregivers need better support during the diagnostic journey. What we learn from studying sCJD and other RPDs is likely applicable to other more common dementias.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

照顾者在快速进展的痴呆症诊断过程中的经历。
导言:疑似阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)患者及其家人在寻求诊断的过程中经历了一个繁重的过程。这些挑战对于最常见的痴呆综合征来说都是问题,但对于较罕见的非典型综合征,如快速进展性痴呆症(RPDs),则可能更加令人苦恼,因为这些疾病可能在发病后数月内致命。在这项混合方法研究中,定性数据来自对 12 名死于快速进展性痴呆症(sCJD)患者的前护理人员的访谈。病历审查数据来自于有关 sCJD 患者的研究和临床病历数据。多学科研究小组采用定性和描述性统计分析方法对数据进行了分析:结果:我们确定了 4 大主题来描述 sCJD 诊断过程中的经历:临床医生的知识、临床医生的沟通、不确定的经历以及作为倡导者的护理者。我们还确定了诊断过程中的 4 个阶段:识别、诊断工作、诊断和诊断后。每个阶段的次主题包括:努力认识到问题所在、复杂的检查和转诊过程、诊断的延迟和披露以及诊断后资源的获取:研究结果表明,还需要做更多的工作来提高临床医生的诊断知识和沟通技巧。此外,护理人员在诊断过程中也需要更好的支持。我们从研究 sCJD 和其他 RPD 中获得的知识很可能适用于其他更常见的痴呆症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信