Does Mindfulness Improve Intergroup Bias, Internalized Bias, and Anti-Bias Outcomes?: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidence and Agenda for Future Research.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Doris F Chang, James Donald, Jennifer Whitney, Iris Yi Miao, Baljinder Sahdra
{"title":"Does Mindfulness Improve Intergroup Bias, Internalized Bias, and Anti-Bias Outcomes?: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidence and Agenda for Future Research.","authors":"Doris F Chang, James Donald, Jennifer Whitney, Iris Yi Miao, Baljinder Sahdra","doi":"10.1177/01461672231178518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whereas mindfulness has been shown to enhance personal well-being, studies suggest it may also benefit intergroup dynamics. Using an integrative conceptual model, this meta-analysis examined associations between mindfulness and (a) different <i>manifestations of bias</i> (implicit/explicit attitudes, affect, behavior) directed toward (b) different <i>bias targets</i> (outgroup or ingroup, e.g., internalized bias), by (c) <i>intergroup orientation</i> (toward bias or anti-bias). Of 70 samples, 42 (<i>N</i> = 3,229) assessed mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and 30 (<i>N</i> = 6,002) were correlational studies. Results showed a medium-sized negative effect of MBIs on bias outcomes, <i>g</i> = -0.56, 95% confidence interval [-0.72, -0.40]; I(2;3)2: 0.39; 0.48, and a small-to-medium negative effect between mindfulness and bias for correlational studies, <i>r</i> = -0.17 [-0.27, -0.03]; I(2;3)2: 0.11; 0.83. Effects were comparable for intergroup bias and internalized bias. We conclude by identifying gaps in the evidence base to guide future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231178518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whereas mindfulness has been shown to enhance personal well-being, studies suggest it may also benefit intergroup dynamics. Using an integrative conceptual model, this meta-analysis examined associations between mindfulness and (a) different manifestations of bias (implicit/explicit attitudes, affect, behavior) directed toward (b) different bias targets (outgroup or ingroup, e.g., internalized bias), by (c) intergroup orientation (toward bias or anti-bias). Of 70 samples, 42 (N = 3,229) assessed mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and 30 (N = 6,002) were correlational studies. Results showed a medium-sized negative effect of MBIs on bias outcomes, g = -0.56, 95% confidence interval [-0.72, -0.40]; I(2;3)2: 0.39; 0.48, and a small-to-medium negative effect between mindfulness and bias for correlational studies, r = -0.17 [-0.27, -0.03]; I(2;3)2: 0.11; 0.83. Effects were comparable for intergroup bias and internalized bias. We conclude by identifying gaps in the evidence base to guide future research.

正念能否改善群体间偏见、内化偏见和反偏见结果?证据元分析与未来研究议程》。
正念已被证明可以提高个人幸福感,而研究表明,正念也可能有益于群体间的动态关系。这项荟萃分析使用了一个综合概念模型,研究了正念与(a)针对(b)不同偏见目标(外群体或内群体,如内化偏见)的不同偏见表现(内隐/外显态度、情感、行为)之间的关联,以及(c)群体间取向(倾向偏见或反偏见)之间的关联。在 70 个样本中,42 个(样本数 = 3,229 个)评估了正念干预(MBI),30 个(样本数 = 6,002 个)是相关研究。结果显示,正念干预对偏见结果有中等程度的负面影响,g = -0.56,95% 置信区间 [-0.72, -0.40];I(2;3)2:0.39; 0.48,而相关研究中正念与偏见之间有中等至小程度的负面影响,r = -0.17 [-0.27, -0.03];I(2;3)2:0.11; 0.83。对于群体间偏见和内化偏见的影响具有可比性。最后,我们指出了证据基础中的不足,以指导未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信