Effect of Additive and Subtractive Coping Production Techniques on Retention and Marginal Fit of Implant Supported Crowns.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hayriye Senturk Cesmeci, Hasan Onder Gumus, Mutlu Özcan
{"title":"Effect of Additive and Subtractive Coping Production Techniques on Retention and Marginal Fit of Implant Supported Crowns.","authors":"Hayriye Senturk Cesmeci,&nbsp;Hasan Onder Gumus,&nbsp;Mutlu Özcan","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the marginal and internal fit and retention of crowns fabricated using 4 different castable pattern production methods, namely plastic burn out coping, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled (CAD-CAM-M), CAD-CAM additive (CAD-CAM-A), and conventional. This study consisted of 5 groups including 2 different brands of burn out coping groups (Burn out-Straumann [Burn out-S] group and Burn out-Implance [Burn out-I] group), the CAD-CAM-M group, the CAD-CAM-A group, and the conventional group. A total of 50 metal crown copings were produced in each group with 10 metal crown copings. The marginal gap of the specimens was measured twice-both before and after the cementation and thermocycling processes using a stereomicroscope. A total of 5 specimens were selected randomly-1 from each group for scanning electron microscopy analysis and sectioned longitudinally. The pull-out test was performed on the remaining 45 specimens. The lowest marginal gap value was observed in the Burn out-S group before and after cementation with 88.54-97.48 μm, respectively, while the highest marginal gap was observed in the conventional group (186.27-200.58 μm). Implant systems did not significantly affect the marginal gap values (P > .05). Marginal gap values increased significantly after cementation and thermal cycling in all the groups (P < .0001). The highest retention value was measured in the Burn out-S group while the lowest in the CAD-CAM-A group. The highest occlusal cement gap values were observed in the coping groups (Burn out-S and Burn out-I groups), and the lowest in the conventional group in the scanning electron microscopy analysis. The marginal fit and retention values of the prefabricated plastic burn out coping technique was superior when compared with the other techniques, providing that internal fit was superior with the conventional technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":50101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"49 2","pages":"157-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the marginal and internal fit and retention of crowns fabricated using 4 different castable pattern production methods, namely plastic burn out coping, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled (CAD-CAM-M), CAD-CAM additive (CAD-CAM-A), and conventional. This study consisted of 5 groups including 2 different brands of burn out coping groups (Burn out-Straumann [Burn out-S] group and Burn out-Implance [Burn out-I] group), the CAD-CAM-M group, the CAD-CAM-A group, and the conventional group. A total of 50 metal crown copings were produced in each group with 10 metal crown copings. The marginal gap of the specimens was measured twice-both before and after the cementation and thermocycling processes using a stereomicroscope. A total of 5 specimens were selected randomly-1 from each group for scanning electron microscopy analysis and sectioned longitudinally. The pull-out test was performed on the remaining 45 specimens. The lowest marginal gap value was observed in the Burn out-S group before and after cementation with 88.54-97.48 μm, respectively, while the highest marginal gap was observed in the conventional group (186.27-200.58 μm). Implant systems did not significantly affect the marginal gap values (P > .05). Marginal gap values increased significantly after cementation and thermal cycling in all the groups (P < .0001). The highest retention value was measured in the Burn out-S group while the lowest in the CAD-CAM-A group. The highest occlusal cement gap values were observed in the coping groups (Burn out-S and Burn out-I groups), and the lowest in the conventional group in the scanning electron microscopy analysis. The marginal fit and retention values of the prefabricated plastic burn out coping technique was superior when compared with the other techniques, providing that internal fit was superior with the conventional technique.

加、减顶工艺对种植体支撑冠固位和边缘配合的影响。
本研究采用4种不同的铸造模式生产方法,即塑料烧坏顶、计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)铣削(CAD-CAM- m)、CAD-CAM添加剂(CAD-CAM- a)和常规方法,对冠的边缘和内部配合和固位进行了研究。本研究共分为5组,包括2种不同品牌的“燃竭应对”组(burn - straumann [burn - s]组和burn - implance [burn - i]组)、CAD-CAM-M组、CAD-CAM-A组和常规组。每组共制作金属冠套50个,每组金属冠套10个。在胶结和热循环过程之前和之后,使用体视显微镜测量了两次样品的边缘间隙。每组随机抽取1个标本,共5个标本进行扫描电镜分析和纵向切片。对剩余45个标本进行拔试。Burn - out-S组固牙前后的边缘间隙值最小,分别为88.54 ~ 97.48 μm,而Burn - out-S组的边缘间隙值最大,为186.27 ~ 200.58 μm。种植体系统对边缘间隙值无显著影响(P > 0.05)。所有组的边缘间隙值在固接和热循环后均显著增加(P < 0.0001)。Burn - out-S组的保留值最高,CAD-CAM-A组的保留值最低。扫描电镜分析结果显示,牙合间隙值在修复组(Burn - out-S组和Burn - out-I组)最高,在常规组最低。预制塑料烧坏顶接技术的边缘配合值和保留值优于其他技术,但内部配合优于常规技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Implantology
Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry and of the American Academy of Implant Prosthodontics, is dedicated to providing valuable information to general dentists, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists, scientists, clinicians, laboratory owners and technicians, manufacturers, and educators. Implant basics, prosthetics, pharmaceuticals, the latest research in implantology, implant surgery, and advanced implant procedures are just some of the topics covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信