Religious and Existential Determinants of Affective Response to a Brief Mindfulness Intervention

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Micheline R. Anderson, Deanna M. Kaplan, Roman Palitsky
{"title":"Religious and Existential Determinants of Affective Response to a Brief Mindfulness Intervention","authors":"Micheline R. Anderson,&nbsp;Deanna M. Kaplan,&nbsp;Roman Palitsky","doi":"10.1007/s42761-022-00139-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are often promoted in the Western world as being “secular” in nature, despite the religious/spiritual (R/S) roots of mindfulness itself. Relevant individual characteristics such as R/S, however, have yet to be examined thoroughly in relation to treatment response. Using pre-post experimental designs, we examined the interaction of participant religiosity and different religious framings (Buddhist, secular, spiritual) of a brief MBI as determinants of affective responses to the MBI using regression in two online samples (Study 1: <i>N</i>=677; Study 2: <i>N=</i> 157). Aspects of religiosity (existential quest, scriptural literalism) had differential effects on affective responses to MBIs dependent on the framing of the condition. Participants’ R/S, as well as the R/S attributes of an MBI, may impact affective responses to MBIs. Further research is needed to ascertain how, and to what extent, MBIs might be optimized in order to maximize benefits for participants with diverse religious and existential commitments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-022-00139-0.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-022-00139-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are often promoted in the Western world as being “secular” in nature, despite the religious/spiritual (R/S) roots of mindfulness itself. Relevant individual characteristics such as R/S, however, have yet to be examined thoroughly in relation to treatment response. Using pre-post experimental designs, we examined the interaction of participant religiosity and different religious framings (Buddhist, secular, spiritual) of a brief MBI as determinants of affective responses to the MBI using regression in two online samples (Study 1: N=677; Study 2: N= 157). Aspects of religiosity (existential quest, scriptural literalism) had differential effects on affective responses to MBIs dependent on the framing of the condition. Participants’ R/S, as well as the R/S attributes of an MBI, may impact affective responses to MBIs. Further research is needed to ascertain how, and to what extent, MBIs might be optimized in order to maximize benefits for participants with diverse religious and existential commitments.

Abstract Image

对短暂正念干预的情感反应的宗教和存在主义决定因素
基于正念的干预(MBI)在西方世界经常被宣传为本质上的“世俗”,尽管正念本身有宗教/精神(R/S)根源。然而,相关的个体特征,如R/S,尚未与治疗反应进行彻底检查。使用前后实验设计,我们在两个在线样本中使用回归检验了参与者的宗教信仰和简短MBI的不同宗教框架(佛教、世俗、精神)的相互作用,作为MBI情感反应的决定因素(研究1:N=677;研究2:N=157)。宗教信仰的各个方面(存在主义探索、圣经文学主义)对MBI的情感反应有不同的影响,这取决于条件的框架。参与者的R/S以及MBI的R/S属性可能会影响对MBI的情感反应。需要进一步的研究来确定如何以及在多大程度上优化MBI,以最大限度地为具有不同宗教和生存承诺的参与者带来利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信