An Overview on Research in a University Hospital, Using a Payback Framework Categorization Approach.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Quality Management in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000415
Stefania Medellin-Lacedelli, Elvira Castro-Martinez, Fernando Martinez-Hernandez, Mirza Romero-Valdovinos, Lourdes Suarez-Roa, Pablo Maravilla, Hector Prado-Calleros, Ana Flisser, Octavio Sierra-Martinez
{"title":"An Overview on Research in a University Hospital, Using a Payback Framework Categorization Approach.","authors":"Stefania Medellin-Lacedelli, Elvira Castro-Martinez, Fernando Martinez-Hernandez, Mirza Romero-Valdovinos, Lourdes Suarez-Roa, Pablo Maravilla, Hector Prado-Calleros, Ana Flisser, Octavio Sierra-Martinez","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Little information is available on how to assess the impact of research studies conducted in government hospitals in Latin America and specifically in Mexico. We aimed to determine the returns on investment of the research projects that were carried out in the Hospital General \"Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez\" (HGMGG), a general university hospital located in Mexico City, using a categorization model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a study including bibliometric analyses of publications associated with all research studies performed during the period 2016-2019 in the HGMGG and investigator interviews, according to the payback framework categorization model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studies analyzed had a positive impact based on outcomes in 5 \"payback categories\": (1) knowledge; (2) research targeting, capacity building, and absorption; (3) policy and product development; (4) health benefits; and (5) broader economic benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To date, it has not been possible to establish a set of indicators that show the results of the investigations carried out by medical specialists in training, who carry out the bulk of medical care in general hospitals and in the National Institutes of Health in Mexico. We identified, in the 5 categories of the payback framework model, different areas of opportunity to improve the benefits of the hospital's medical services through the development of scientific research projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10782936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Little information is available on how to assess the impact of research studies conducted in government hospitals in Latin America and specifically in Mexico. We aimed to determine the returns on investment of the research projects that were carried out in the Hospital General "Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez" (HGMGG), a general university hospital located in Mexico City, using a categorization model.

Methods: We conducted a study including bibliometric analyses of publications associated with all research studies performed during the period 2016-2019 in the HGMGG and investigator interviews, according to the payback framework categorization model.

Results: All studies analyzed had a positive impact based on outcomes in 5 "payback categories": (1) knowledge; (2) research targeting, capacity building, and absorption; (3) policy and product development; (4) health benefits; and (5) broader economic benefits.

Conclusions: To date, it has not been possible to establish a set of indicators that show the results of the investigations carried out by medical specialists in training, who carry out the bulk of medical care in general hospitals and in the National Institutes of Health in Mexico. We identified, in the 5 categories of the payback framework model, different areas of opportunity to improve the benefits of the hospital's medical services through the development of scientific research projects.

使用回报框架分类法概述大学医院的研究工作。
背景和目的:关于如何评估拉丁美洲,特别是墨西哥政府医院开展的研究项目的影响,目前几乎没有相关信息。我们的目的是采用分类模型,确定在墨西哥城一所综合性大学医院 "曼努埃尔-盖亚-冈萨雷斯博士综合医院"(HGMGG)开展的研究项目的投资回报:根据回报框架分类模型,我们进行了一项研究,包括对 2016-2019 年期间在 "曼努埃尔-盖亚-冈萨雷斯博士 "总医院开展的所有研究的相关出版物进行文献计量分析,以及对研究人员进行访谈:根据 5 个 "回报类别 "的结果,分析的所有研究都产生了积极影响:(1)知识;(2)研究目标、能力建设和吸收;(3)政策和产品开发;(4)健康效益;以及(5)更广泛的经济效益:迄今为止,我们还无法制定一套指标来显示接受培训的医学专家所开展的调查的结果,而这些专家在墨西哥的综合医院和国家卫生研究所中承担着大部分的医疗工作。我们在回报框架模型的 5 个类别中确定了不同的机会领域,以便通过发展科研项目来提高医院医疗服务的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信