Comparison of Impact Accelerations During Performance of Common Ballet Maneuvers: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Caitlin Fallon, Paj Yang, Misty Lown, Michelle Reilly, Nicole Bednarz, Kyle Gamoke, Alexander Morgan, Thomas Gus Almonroeder
{"title":"Comparison of Impact Accelerations During Performance of Common Ballet Maneuvers: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Caitlin Fallon,&nbsp;Paj Yang,&nbsp;Misty Lown,&nbsp;Michelle Reilly,&nbsp;Nicole Bednarz,&nbsp;Kyle Gamoke,&nbsp;Alexander Morgan,&nbsp;Thomas Gus Almonroeder","doi":"10.1177/1089313X231177174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ballet landings produce accelerations that are transmitted proximally up the kinetic chain. If overly excessive/repetitive, these \"shocks\" to the lower body may contribute to overuse injury. The shocks imposed by different ballet maneuvers are largely unknown at this time, making it difficult to appreciate the physical stresses associated with different maneuvers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the impact accelerations associated with different common ballet maneuvers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of this study, 11 adolescent ballet dancers performed 9 different common ballet maneuvers: (1) <i>glissade</i>, (2) <i>pas de chat</i>, (3) <i>petit jeté</i>, (4) <i>petit assemblé</i>, (5) <i>grand assemblé</i>, (6) <i>grand jeté</i>, (7) <i>saut de chat</i>, (8) <i>changement</i>, and (9) <i>entrechat quatre</i>. An inertial sensor secured to the pelvis was used to record the peak resultant acceleration during landings (\"impact acceleration\"). A Friedman test was conducted to compare impact accelerations across the maneuvers and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted as pairwise comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The omnibus test indicated that there were differences in impact accelerations among the maneuvers (<i>P</i> < .001). In general, the <i>glissade</i> (2.08 ± 0.47<i>g</i>), <i>pes de chat</i> (2.33 ± 0.23<i>g</i>), <i>petit jeté</i> (2.42 ± 0.29<i>g</i>), and <i>petite assemblé</i> (2.54 ± 0.47<i>g</i>) tended to be the lower impact maneuvers; the <i>grand assemblé</i> (2.90 ± 0.41<i>g</i>), <i>grand jeté</i> (2.99 ± 0.33<i>g</i>), and <i>saut de chat</i> (3.13 ± 0.54<i>g</i>) tended to be the more moderate impact maneuvers; and the <i>changement</i> (4.10 ± 0.48<i>g</i>) and <i>entrechat quatre</i> (4.32 ± 0.52<i>g</i>) tended to be higher impact maneuvers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings may provide clinicians and dance instructors with greater insight regarding the physical stresses imposed by different ballet maneuvers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":"27 2","pages":"87-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X231177174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ballet landings produce accelerations that are transmitted proximally up the kinetic chain. If overly excessive/repetitive, these "shocks" to the lower body may contribute to overuse injury. The shocks imposed by different ballet maneuvers are largely unknown at this time, making it difficult to appreciate the physical stresses associated with different maneuvers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the impact accelerations associated with different common ballet maneuvers.

Methods: As part of this study, 11 adolescent ballet dancers performed 9 different common ballet maneuvers: (1) glissade, (2) pas de chat, (3) petit jeté, (4) petit assemblé, (5) grand assemblé, (6) grand jeté, (7) saut de chat, (8) changement, and (9) entrechat quatre. An inertial sensor secured to the pelvis was used to record the peak resultant acceleration during landings ("impact acceleration"). A Friedman test was conducted to compare impact accelerations across the maneuvers and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted as pairwise comparisons.

Results: The omnibus test indicated that there were differences in impact accelerations among the maneuvers (P < .001). In general, the glissade (2.08 ± 0.47g), pes de chat (2.33 ± 0.23g), petit jeté (2.42 ± 0.29g), and petite assemblé (2.54 ± 0.47g) tended to be the lower impact maneuvers; the grand assemblé (2.90 ± 0.41g), grand jeté (2.99 ± 0.33g), and saut de chat (3.13 ± 0.54g) tended to be the more moderate impact maneuvers; and the changement (4.10 ± 0.48g) and entrechat quatre (4.32 ± 0.52g) tended to be higher impact maneuvers.

Conclusion: These findings may provide clinicians and dance instructors with greater insight regarding the physical stresses imposed by different ballet maneuvers.

普通芭蕾动作表演中碰撞加速度的比较:一项初步研究。
简介:芭蕾式的落地产生的加速度是向上传递的动力链。如果过度或重复,这些对下半身的“冲击”可能会导致过度使用损伤。不同的芭蕾舞动作所带来的冲击在很大程度上是未知的,这使得很难理解与不同动作相关的身体压力。因此,本研究的目的是比较不同常见芭蕾动作的冲击加速度。方法:作为本研究的一部分,11名青少年芭蕾舞者表演了9种不同的常见芭蕾舞动作:(1)滑步,(2)跳双人舞,(3)小跳跃,(4)小组合,(5)大组合,(6)大跳跃,(7)跳双人舞,(8)变化,(9)转头四分之一。使用固定在骨盆上的惯性传感器记录着陆时的峰值加速度(“冲击加速度”)。采用Friedman测试比较不同动作的碰撞加速度,采用Wilcoxon符号秩测试进行两两比较。结果:综合试验结果表明,滑翔(2.08±0.47g)、飞艇(2.33±0.23g)、小喷气机(2.42±0.29g)、小装配(2.54±0.47g)的碰撞加速度在不同动作间存在差异;大组合动作(2.90±0.41g)、大喷射动作(2.99±0.33g)和炒炒动作(3.13±0.54g)是较为温和的冲击动作;变化幅度(4.10±0.48g)和中间四分之一(4.32±0.52g)倾向于高冲击动作。结论:这些发现可以为临床医生和舞蹈教练提供更多关于不同芭蕾动作所带来的身体压力的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信