Early Outcomes of the Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter : A Multicentre Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1007/s00062-023-01314-x
Sara Sciacca, Ahmed Bassiouny, Nina Mansoor, Thais Minett, Parthiban Balasundaram, Juveria Siddiqui, Yogish Joshi, Shahram Derakhshani, Naga Kandasamy, Thomas Calvert Booth, Jeremy Lynch
{"title":"Early Outcomes of the Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter : A Multicentre Study.","authors":"Sara Sciacca, Ahmed Bassiouny, Nina Mansoor, Thais Minett, Parthiban Balasundaram, Juveria Siddiqui, Yogish Joshi, Shahram Derakhshani, Naga Kandasamy, Thomas Calvert Booth, Jeremy Lynch","doi":"10.1007/s00062-023-01314-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The recently introduced Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology is the fourth generation of Pipeline flow diverter devices. Due to the relatively high rate of intraprocedural technical complications, modifications were subsequently made to the device after a limited release of the device in 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the modified version of this device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentre retrospective series. The primary efficacy endpoint was aneurysm occlusion in the absence of retreatment. The primary safety endpoint was any neurological morbidity or death. Ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 procedures were performed for 60 target aneurysms. Treatment was performed on 5 patients with ruptured aneurysms. The technical success rate was 98%. The mean clinical follow-up time was 5.5 months. In patients presenting with unruptured aneurysms there were no deaths, 3 (6.4%) major complications and 7 (13%) minor complications. In the five patients presenting with subarachnoid haemorrhage there were 2 (40%) major complications with 1 (20%) of these resulting in death, and 1 (20%) minor complication. Of the patients 29 (56%) had undergone 6‑monthly postprocedural angiographic imaging with a mean time of 6.6 months demonstrating that 83% of patients had achieved adequate occlusion (RROC1/2) of the aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this non-industry-sponsored study, the occlusion rates and safety outcomes were similar to those seen in previously published studies with flow diverter devices and earlier generation Pipeline devices. Modifications to the device appear to have improved ease of deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"887-896"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01314-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The recently introduced Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology is the fourth generation of Pipeline flow diverter devices. Due to the relatively high rate of intraprocedural technical complications, modifications were subsequently made to the device after a limited release of the device in 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the modified version of this device.

Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective series. The primary efficacy endpoint was aneurysm occlusion in the absence of retreatment. The primary safety endpoint was any neurological morbidity or death. Ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included in the study.

Results: A total of 52 procedures were performed for 60 target aneurysms. Treatment was performed on 5 patients with ruptured aneurysms. The technical success rate was 98%. The mean clinical follow-up time was 5.5 months. In patients presenting with unruptured aneurysms there were no deaths, 3 (6.4%) major complications and 7 (13%) minor complications. In the five patients presenting with subarachnoid haemorrhage there were 2 (40%) major complications with 1 (20%) of these resulting in death, and 1 (20%) minor complication. Of the patients 29 (56%) had undergone 6‑monthly postprocedural angiographic imaging with a mean time of 6.6 months demonstrating that 83% of patients had achieved adequate occlusion (RROC1/2) of the aneurysm.

Conclusions: In this non-industry-sponsored study, the occlusion rates and safety outcomes were similar to those seen in previously published studies with flow diverter devices and earlier generation Pipeline devices. Modifications to the device appear to have improved ease of deployment.

Abstract Image

管道分流器的早期结果:一项多中心研究。
目的:最近推出的管道优势栓塞装置与屏蔽技术是第四代管道分流装置。由于术中技术并发症的发生率相对较高,因此在2020年有限释放该设备后,随后对该设备进行了修改。本研究旨在评估该装置改良版的安全性和有效性。方法:这是一项多中心回顾性研究。主要疗效终点是在没有再治疗的情况下动脉瘤闭塞。主要安全终点是任何神经系统疾病或死亡。研究中包括破裂和未破裂的动脉瘤。结果:60个目标动脉瘤共行52次手术。对5例动脉瘤破裂患者进行治疗。技术成功率为98%。平均临床随访时间为5.5个月。未破裂动脉瘤患者无死亡,3例(6.4%)有严重并发症,7例(13%)有轻微并发症。在5例蛛网膜下腔出血患者中,有2例(40%)严重并发症,其中1例(20%)导致死亡,1例(20%)轻微并发症。29例(56%)患者进行了6个月的术后血管造影,平均6.6个月的时间显示83%的患者达到了动脉瘤的充分闭塞(RROC1/2)。结论:在这项非行业赞助的研究中,闭塞率和安全性结果与之前发表的关于分流装置和早期管道装置的研究相似。对设备的修改似乎提高了部署的便利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信