Management of complex regional pain syndrome in trauma and orthopaedic surgery-a systematic review.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Abdel Saed, Greg Neal-Smith, Scott Fernquest, Jonathan Bourget-Murray, Alexander Wood
{"title":"Management of complex regional pain syndrome in trauma and orthopaedic surgery-a systematic review.","authors":"Abdel Saed, Greg Neal-Smith, Scott Fernquest, Jonathan Bourget-Murray, Alexander Wood","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldac034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neurological pain disorder that is challenging to diagnose and manage, resulting in increased morbidity and costs. It most commonly occurs following traumatic injury, such as a fracture, crush injury or surgery. Recent research has evaluated the efficacy of treatments which have contradicted previous hypotheses. This systematic review summarizes these findings to improve clinician's decision-making.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases from inception through January 2021 was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened relevant articles discussing the management of CRPS in adult trauma patients. All prospective and retrospective studies, non-randomized comparison studies and case series were considered for inclusion. Data extraction was performed by populating a predefined data abstraction sheet.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>There is strong evidence to suggest the efficacy of prompt physiotherapy, lidocaine, ketamine, bisphosphonates, sympathectomy and brachial plexus blocks in the management of CRPS.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The latest evidence suggests that vitamin C has no significant role to play in the treatment or prevention of CRPS.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>A multidisciplinary team approach and early diagnosis are imperative for successful treatment of CRPS. The Budapest criteria and the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines should be used when diagnosing CRPS. There is currently no clear evidence of superiority in any treatment.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>There are few high-quality studies that inform the best treatment modalities for CRPS. Though emerging treatments show promise, further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"146 1","pages":"27-42"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neurological pain disorder that is challenging to diagnose and manage, resulting in increased morbidity and costs. It most commonly occurs following traumatic injury, such as a fracture, crush injury or surgery. Recent research has evaluated the efficacy of treatments which have contradicted previous hypotheses. This systematic review summarizes these findings to improve clinician's decision-making.

Sources of data: A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases from inception through January 2021 was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened relevant articles discussing the management of CRPS in adult trauma patients. All prospective and retrospective studies, non-randomized comparison studies and case series were considered for inclusion. Data extraction was performed by populating a predefined data abstraction sheet.

Areas of agreement: There is strong evidence to suggest the efficacy of prompt physiotherapy, lidocaine, ketamine, bisphosphonates, sympathectomy and brachial plexus blocks in the management of CRPS.

Areas of controversy: The latest evidence suggests that vitamin C has no significant role to play in the treatment or prevention of CRPS.

Growing points: A multidisciplinary team approach and early diagnosis are imperative for successful treatment of CRPS. The Budapest criteria and the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines should be used when diagnosing CRPS. There is currently no clear evidence of superiority in any treatment.

Areas timely for developing research: There are few high-quality studies that inform the best treatment modalities for CRPS. Though emerging treatments show promise, further research is needed.

创伤和骨科手术中复杂区域疼痛综合征的处理-系统综述。
复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是一种神经系统疼痛障碍,诊断和管理具有挑战性,导致发病率和成本增加。它最常见于创伤性损伤,如骨折、挤压伤或手术。最近的研究评估了与先前假设相矛盾的治疗方法的疗效。本系统综述总结了这些发现,以提高临床医生的决策。数据来源:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,对PubMed、MEDLINE和Embase数据库进行了全面检索,从成立到2021年1月。两位评论者独立筛选了讨论成人创伤患者CRPS处理的相关文章。所有前瞻性和回顾性研究、非随机比较研究和病例系列均被纳入考虑。通过填充预定义的数据抽象表来执行数据提取。共识领域:有强有力的证据表明,及时的物理治疗、利多卡因、氯胺酮、双磷酸盐、交感神经切除术和臂丛神经阻滞在治疗CRPS中的有效性。争议领域:最新证据表明,维生素C在治疗或预防CRPS方面没有显著作用。成长要点:多学科合作和早期诊断是成功治疗CRPS的必要条件。诊断CRPS时应使用布达佩斯标准和英国骨科协会创伤和骨科标准(自夸)指南。目前还没有明确的证据表明任何一种治疗方法具有优越性。及时开展研究的领域:很少有高质量的研究告知CRPS的最佳治疗方式。虽然新兴的治疗方法显示出希望,但还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信