Use of Additive Technologies in Surgical Treatment of Chronic Posterior Dislocations of the Shoulder.

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
D V Pavlov, S B Korolev, A Yu Kopylov, A A Zykin, R O Gorbatov, T V Illarionova, V V Gorin, R V Alyev
{"title":"Use of Additive Technologies in Surgical Treatment of Chronic Posterior Dislocations of the Shoulder.","authors":"D V Pavlov, S B Korolev, A Yu Kopylov, A A Zykin, R O Gorbatov, T V Illarionova, V V Gorin, R V Alyev","doi":"10.17691/stm2022.14.3.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of additive technologies in surgical treatment of patients with osteochondral defects of the humeral head articular surface against the background of chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder by means of comparing clinical and radiological results with the McLaughlin procedure. Materials and Methods A prospective randomized comparative group clinical study was conducted, which included 20 patients who in 2019–2021 underwent surgical treatment of chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder in the Traumatological and Orthopedic Department of the Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Privolzhsky Research Medical University (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia). Depending on the type of surgery, all patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n=10) was subject to McLaughlin procedure, whereas group 2 (n=10) — to reconstruction of the humeral head using a customized implant based on additive technologies (3D printing). To assess postoperative results, 6 months after the surgery all patients underwent the following procedures: X-ray imaging of the shoulder joint in two projections, CT scanning, and angulometry as well as provided their responses in line with the following questionnaires: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ), and the Hospital for Special Surgery Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey (Survey of patient, SP). Results Both the McLaughlin procedure and the reconstruction of the humeral head using a customized implant made using additive 3D printing technologies increased the range of motion in the shoulder joint, mitigated the pain syndrome and improved the patients’ quality of life. During the postoperative period, there were no infectious complications in both groups. The total bed-day in group 1 was 7 [5; 9] days; in group 2, it was 8 [6; 9] days. There was no recurrence of dislocation or progression of osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint in patients in both groups during 6 months after the surgery. The ASES, SP, SRQ, CSS, DASH, and VAS questionnaires assessment for both groups showed a statistically significant improvement for all indicators in the postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences found between the groups as to the results of angulometry and answering the questionnaires. Conclusion Customized implants made using additive technologies can shorten the surgery duration by 1.3 times, whereas the volume of intraoperative blood loss — by at least 1.5 times compared to the McLaughlin procedure.","PeriodicalId":51886,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10090916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.3.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of additive technologies in surgical treatment of patients with osteochondral defects of the humeral head articular surface against the background of chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder by means of comparing clinical and radiological results with the McLaughlin procedure. Materials and Methods A prospective randomized comparative group clinical study was conducted, which included 20 patients who in 2019–2021 underwent surgical treatment of chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder in the Traumatological and Orthopedic Department of the Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Privolzhsky Research Medical University (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia). Depending on the type of surgery, all patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n=10) was subject to McLaughlin procedure, whereas group 2 (n=10) — to reconstruction of the humeral head using a customized implant based on additive technologies (3D printing). To assess postoperative results, 6 months after the surgery all patients underwent the following procedures: X-ray imaging of the shoulder joint in two projections, CT scanning, and angulometry as well as provided their responses in line with the following questionnaires: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ), and the Hospital for Special Surgery Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey (Survey of patient, SP). Results Both the McLaughlin procedure and the reconstruction of the humeral head using a customized implant made using additive 3D printing technologies increased the range of motion in the shoulder joint, mitigated the pain syndrome and improved the patients’ quality of life. During the postoperative period, there were no infectious complications in both groups. The total bed-day in group 1 was 7 [5; 9] days; in group 2, it was 8 [6; 9] days. There was no recurrence of dislocation or progression of osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint in patients in both groups during 6 months after the surgery. The ASES, SP, SRQ, CSS, DASH, and VAS questionnaires assessment for both groups showed a statistically significant improvement for all indicators in the postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences found between the groups as to the results of angulometry and answering the questionnaires. Conclusion Customized implants made using additive technologies can shorten the surgery duration by 1.3 times, whereas the volume of intraoperative blood loss — by at least 1.5 times compared to the McLaughlin procedure.
添加剂技术在慢性肩关节后脱位手术治疗中的应用。
本研究的目的是通过比较McLaughlin手术的临床和影像学结果,评估添加剂技术在治疗慢性肩关节后路脱位的肱骨头关节面骨软骨缺损患者中的疗效。材料与方法:采用前瞻性随机对照组临床研究,纳入2019-2021年在俄罗斯普里伏尔日斯基医科大学创伤与骨科研究所(Nizhny Novgorod, Russia)创伤与骨科行慢性肩关节后脱位手术治疗的20例患者。根据手术类型,所有患者被分为两组:第一组(n=10)接受McLaughlin手术,而第二组(n=10)使用基于增材技术(3D打印)的定制植入物重建肱骨头。为了评估术后效果,术后6个月,所有患者均接受了以下检查:肩关节的x线双投影成像、CT扫描和角度测量,并根据以下问卷提供了他们的回答:视觉模拟量表(VAS)、臂、肩、手残疾(DASH)、美国肩肘外科医生肩部评分(ASES)、恒肩评分(CSS)、肩部评定问卷(SRQ)、特种外科医院肩部手术期望调查(SP)。结果:McLaughlin手术和使用3D打印技术制作的定制植入物重建肱骨头都增加了肩关节的活动范围,减轻了疼痛综合征,提高了患者的生活质量。术后两组均无感染并发症发生。1组总卧床时间为7天[5];9)天;第二组为8 [6];9天。术后6个月内,两组患者均无脱位复发或肩关节骨关节炎进展。两组患者术后的asa、SP、SRQ、CSS、DASH、VAS问卷评估各项指标均有统计学意义的改善。两组在测角结果和问卷回答方面无统计学差异。结论:与McLaughlin手术相比,使用添加剂技术制作的定制植入物可缩短手术时间1.3倍,术中出血量至少减少1.5倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信