Bioequivalence of Two Tiotropium Dry Powder Inhalers and the Utility of Realistic Impactor Testing.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Clarissa Gobetti, Sanjeeva Dissanayake, Jag Shur, William Ganley, Lucas Silva, Isam Salem, Omaima Najib, Usama Harb
{"title":"Bioequivalence of Two Tiotropium Dry Powder Inhalers and the Utility of Realistic Impactor Testing.","authors":"Clarissa Gobetti,&nbsp;Sanjeeva Dissanayake,&nbsp;Jag Shur,&nbsp;William Ganley,&nbsp;Lucas Silva,&nbsp;Isam Salem,&nbsp;Omaima Najib,&nbsp;Usama Harb","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2022.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Inhaled antimuscarinics are a cornerstone of the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This article details a series of five pharmacokinetic (PK) studies comparing a generic tiotropium dry powder inhaler (DPI) to Spiriva HandiHaler, the realistic <i>in vitro</i> methods used to support those studies, and the related <i>in vitro</i>-<i>in vivo</i> correlations (IVIVCs). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> All five PK studies were of open-label, single-dose, crossover design with test and reference treatments administered to healthy subjects. Following unexpected results in the first three PK studies, a realistic impactor method was developed comprising an Oropharyngeal Consortium (OPC) mouth-throat and simulated inspiratory profiles in conjunction with a Next Generation Impactor (NGI). Mass fractions and the <i>in vitro</i> whole lung dose were estimated for the test product and Spiriva<sup>®</sup> HandiHaler<sup>®</sup> using this method, and IVIVCs derived. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Bioequivalence could not be demonstrated for C<sub>max</sub> in the first three PK studies (test/reference ratios ranging from 83.1% to 131.8%), although was observed for AUC<sub>t</sub>. Reanalysis of the corresponding biobatches with the realistic NGI method revealed <i>in vitro</i> ratios aligned with these PK data (in contrast to the compendial NGI data) and thus inadvertent selection of \"mismatched\" biobatches. Two further PK studies were undertaken, supported by the realistic NGI method. With the comparison of test and reference products similarly positioned within their respective product performance distributions, bioequivalence was confirmed in both studies. IVIVCs based on mass fractions as per the realistic NGI method were robust and highly predictive of PK outcomes. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The test tiotropium DPI and Spiriva HandiHaler were bioequivalent when equitable biobatch comparisons, based on realistic NGI testing, were performed. The observations from this program support the utility of realistic test methods for inhaled product development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"257-267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2022.0065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inhaled antimuscarinics are a cornerstone of the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This article details a series of five pharmacokinetic (PK) studies comparing a generic tiotropium dry powder inhaler (DPI) to Spiriva HandiHaler, the realistic in vitro methods used to support those studies, and the related in vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVCs). Methods: All five PK studies were of open-label, single-dose, crossover design with test and reference treatments administered to healthy subjects. Following unexpected results in the first three PK studies, a realistic impactor method was developed comprising an Oropharyngeal Consortium (OPC) mouth-throat and simulated inspiratory profiles in conjunction with a Next Generation Impactor (NGI). Mass fractions and the in vitro whole lung dose were estimated for the test product and Spiriva® HandiHaler® using this method, and IVIVCs derived. Results: Bioequivalence could not be demonstrated for Cmax in the first three PK studies (test/reference ratios ranging from 83.1% to 131.8%), although was observed for AUCt. Reanalysis of the corresponding biobatches with the realistic NGI method revealed in vitro ratios aligned with these PK data (in contrast to the compendial NGI data) and thus inadvertent selection of "mismatched" biobatches. Two further PK studies were undertaken, supported by the realistic NGI method. With the comparison of test and reference products similarly positioned within their respective product performance distributions, bioequivalence was confirmed in both studies. IVIVCs based on mass fractions as per the realistic NGI method were robust and highly predictive of PK outcomes. Conclusions: The test tiotropium DPI and Spiriva HandiHaler were bioequivalent when equitable biobatch comparisons, based on realistic NGI testing, were performed. The observations from this program support the utility of realistic test methods for inhaled product development.

两种噻托溴铵干粉吸入器的生物等效性和真实冲击器测试的实用性。
引言:吸入抗毒蕈碱是治疗慢性阻塞性肺病的基石。本文详细介绍了一系列五项药代动力学(PK)研究,比较了通用噻托溴铵干粉吸入器(DPI)和Spiriva HandiHaler,用于支持这些研究的现实体外方法,以及相关的体外-体内相关性(IVIVCs)。方法:所有五项PK研究均采用开放标签、单剂量、交叉设计,并对健康受试者进行试验和参考治疗。根据前三项PK研究的意外结果,开发了一种逼真的冲击器方法,该方法包括口咽联合会(OPC)口喉和模拟吸气剖面以及下一代冲击器(NGI)。使用该方法对试验产品和Spiriva®HandiHaler®以及IVIVCs的质量分数和体外全肺剂量进行了估计。结果:在前三项PK研究中,Cmax的生物等效性未得到证明(试验/参考比值在83.1%至131.8%之间),尽管AUCt得到了观察。用实际的NGI方法对相应的生物批次进行重新分析,发现体外比率与这些PK数据一致(与药典NGI数据相反),从而无意中选择了“不匹配”的生物批次。在现实的NGI方法的支持下,进行了两项进一步的PK研究。通过比较在各自产品性能分布内类似定位的试验产品和参考产品,两项研究都证实了生物等效性。根据实际NGI方法,基于质量分数的IVIVCs是稳健的,并且高度预测PK结果。结论:在实际NGI试验的基础上进行公平的生物批次比较时,噻托溴铵DPI和Spiriva HandiHaler试验具有生物等效性。该项目的观察结果支持了吸入产品开发中现实测试方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信