Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media comment on the teaching performance assessment.

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Donna Pendergast, Beryl Exley, Frances Hoyte
{"title":"Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media comment on the teaching performance assessment.","authors":"Donna Pendergast,&nbsp;Beryl Exley,&nbsp;Frances Hoyte","doi":"10.1007/s13384-023-00635-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Australia, the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) is a relatively new, mandatory hurdle which must be completed just prior to the graduation stage of initial teacher education (ITE) programmes. This high-stakes task is one of a growing number of requirements to come out of the standards and accountability regime as outlined in the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) document for accreditation for ITE programmes. We delve into the public commentary about the broader commission of preservice and graduate teacher quality in general and the TPA in particular. We draw on Bernstein's pedagogic identities and deductively apply this theory to explore this phenomenon. We use a data set of publicly available legacy media and social media tweets made over a ten-month period from August 2019 to May 2020 to reveal the focus, inherent bias and pedagogic identities promoted by these public discourses. The paper concludes with discussion about the implications of these drivers on the public perception of quality in ITE and on the status of teaching more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":47159,"journal":{"name":"Australian Educational Researcher","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00635-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Australia, the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) is a relatively new, mandatory hurdle which must be completed just prior to the graduation stage of initial teacher education (ITE) programmes. This high-stakes task is one of a growing number of requirements to come out of the standards and accountability regime as outlined in the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) document for accreditation for ITE programmes. We delve into the public commentary about the broader commission of preservice and graduate teacher quality in general and the TPA in particular. We draw on Bernstein's pedagogic identities and deductively apply this theory to explore this phenomenon. We use a data set of publicly available legacy media and social media tweets made over a ten-month period from August 2019 to May 2020 to reveal the focus, inherent bias and pedagogic identities promoted by these public discourses. The paper concludes with discussion about the implications of these drivers on the public perception of quality in ITE and on the status of teaching more broadly.

教师素质公共评论:媒体对教学绩效评估的评论分析。
在澳大利亚,教学表现评估(TPA)是一个相对较新的强制性障碍,必须在初级师范教育(ITE)课程毕业前完成。这项高风险任务是澳大利亚教学与学校领导学院(AITSL)ITE课程认证文件中列出的标准和问责制度中越来越多的要求之一。我们深入研究了关于更广泛的职前和研究生教师质量委员会的公开评论,特别是TPA。我们借鉴了伯恩斯坦的教育身份,并运用这一理论来探究这一现象。我们使用了一组从2019年8月到2020年5月的十个月时间内公开的传统媒体和社交媒体推文的数据集,来揭示这些公共话语所倡导的焦点、固有偏见和教育身份。文章最后讨论了这些驱动因素对公众对ITE质量感知的影响,以及对更广泛的教学状况的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Educational Researcher
Australian Educational Researcher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Australian Educational Researcher is the international, peer reviewed journal published by AARE. The Australian Educational Researcher is published three times a year and is a Thomson (ISI) indexed journal. The aim of AER is to:Promote understandings of educational issues through the publication of original research and scholarly essays.Inform education policy through the publication of papers utilising a range of research methodologies and addressing issues of theory and practice.Provide a research forum for education researchers to debate current problems and issues.Provide an international and national perspective on education research through the publication of book reviews, scholarly essays, original quantitative and qualitative research and papers that are methodologically or theoretically innovative.AER welcomes contributions from a variety of disciplinary perspectives on any level of education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信