Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time Measured by Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Accurately Detects Changing Stroke Volume During the Passive Leg Raise in Ambulatory Volunteers.
Jon-Émile S Kenny, Christine Horner, Mai Elfarnawany, Andrew M Eibl, Joseph K Eibl
{"title":"Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time Measured by Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Accurately Detects Changing Stroke Volume During the Passive Leg Raise in Ambulatory Volunteers.","authors":"Jon-Émile S Kenny, Christine Horner, Mai Elfarnawany, Andrew M Eibl, Joseph K Eibl","doi":"10.31083/j.fbe1502012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The change in the corrected flow time of the common carotid artery (ccFTΔ) has been used as a surrogate of changing stroke volume (SVΔ) in the critically-ill. Thus, this relatively easy-to-obtain Doppler measure may help clinicians better define the intended effect of intravenous fluids. Yet the temporal evolution of SVΔ and ccFTΔ has not been reported in volunteers undergoing a passive leg raise (PLR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited clinically-euvolemic, non-fasted, adult, volunteers in a local physiology lab to perform 2 PLR maneuvers, each separated by a 5 minute 'wash-out'. During each PLR, SV was measured by a non-invasive pulse contour analysis device. SV was temporally-synchronized with a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound worn over the common carotid artery that continuously measured ccFT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 PLR maneuvers were obtained across 19 ambulatory volunteers. 8856 carotid Doppler cardiac cycles were analyzed. The ccFT increased nearly ubiquitously during the PLR and within 40-60 seconds of PLR onset; the rise in SV from the pulse contour device was more gradual. SVΔ by +5% and +10% were both detected by a +7% ccFTΔ with sensitivities, specificities and areas under the receiver operator curve of 59%, 95% and 0.77 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 66%, 76% and 0.73 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ccFTΔ during the PLR in ambulatory volunteers was rapid and sustained. Within the limits of precision for detecting a clinically-significant rise in SV by a non-invasive pulse contour analysis device, simultaneously-acquired ccFT from a wireless, wearable ultrasound system was accurate at detecting 'preload responsiveness'.</p>","PeriodicalId":73068,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","volume":"15 2","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1502012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The change in the corrected flow time of the common carotid artery (ccFTΔ) has been used as a surrogate of changing stroke volume (SVΔ) in the critically-ill. Thus, this relatively easy-to-obtain Doppler measure may help clinicians better define the intended effect of intravenous fluids. Yet the temporal evolution of SVΔ and ccFTΔ has not been reported in volunteers undergoing a passive leg raise (PLR).
Methods: We recruited clinically-euvolemic, non-fasted, adult, volunteers in a local physiology lab to perform 2 PLR maneuvers, each separated by a 5 minute 'wash-out'. During each PLR, SV was measured by a non-invasive pulse contour analysis device. SV was temporally-synchronized with a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound worn over the common carotid artery that continuously measured ccFT.
Results: 36 PLR maneuvers were obtained across 19 ambulatory volunteers. 8856 carotid Doppler cardiac cycles were analyzed. The ccFT increased nearly ubiquitously during the PLR and within 40-60 seconds of PLR onset; the rise in SV from the pulse contour device was more gradual. SVΔ by +5% and +10% were both detected by a +7% ccFTΔ with sensitivities, specificities and areas under the receiver operator curve of 59%, 95% and 0.77 (p < 0.001) and 66%, 76% and 0.73 (p < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusions: The ccFTΔ during the PLR in ambulatory volunteers was rapid and sustained. Within the limits of precision for detecting a clinically-significant rise in SV by a non-invasive pulse contour analysis device, simultaneously-acquired ccFT from a wireless, wearable ultrasound system was accurate at detecting 'preload responsiveness'.