Is Low Volume Drainage of Ascites Associated With Improved Survival in Digestive System Cancer Patients With Malignant Ascites?-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-24 DOI:10.1177/08258597231170049
Shunya Hoshino, Yusuke Takagi, Takeo Fukagawa, Keiji Sano, Nobuhiko Seki, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Etsuko Aruga
{"title":"Is Low Volume Drainage of Ascites Associated With Improved Survival in Digestive System Cancer Patients With Malignant Ascites?-A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Shunya Hoshino,&nbsp;Yusuke Takagi,&nbsp;Takeo Fukagawa,&nbsp;Keiji Sano,&nbsp;Nobuhiko Seki,&nbsp;Yojiro Hashiguchi,&nbsp;Etsuko Aruga","doi":"10.1177/08258597231170049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To determine whether the volume of paracentesis for malignant ascites in acute care hospital wards is associated with survival and symptom relief. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with malignant ascites caused by digestive system cancer who underwent paracentesis between January 2010 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed from medical records. Collected data included the drainage volume per paracentesis procedure, survival time from the first paracentesis procedure, symptoms, and adverse events. According to the volume per paracentesis procedure, we divided the patients into the \"small-drainage\" (≤1500 mL) and \"standard-drainage\" (>1500 mL) groups. <b>Results:</b> The median age of the 144 patients was 69 years, 33% were female, and 64% had gastrointestinal cancer. The median survival from the first paracentesis procedure was 36 days. Eighty-nine (61.8%) and 55 (38.2%) patients were allocated to the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups, respectively. The median number of paracentesis procedures in the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups was 12 and 7, respectively (<i>P</i>=.001). The median survival in the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups was 50 and 44 days, respectively (<i>P</i>=.76). The multivariate analysis showed that the amount of drainage per session was not significantly associated with survival. Symptoms improved similarly in the 2 groups. No serious adverse events were observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> Paracentesis was demonstrated to be effective and safe, irrespective of the amount of fluid drained, for patients with malignant ascites in an acute care hospital. Thus, a strategy of limiting the amount of drainage is not associated with longer survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/fb/10.1177_08258597231170049.PMC10566212.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597231170049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether the volume of paracentesis for malignant ascites in acute care hospital wards is associated with survival and symptom relief. Methods: Patients with malignant ascites caused by digestive system cancer who underwent paracentesis between January 2010 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed from medical records. Collected data included the drainage volume per paracentesis procedure, survival time from the first paracentesis procedure, symptoms, and adverse events. According to the volume per paracentesis procedure, we divided the patients into the "small-drainage" (≤1500 mL) and "standard-drainage" (>1500 mL) groups. Results: The median age of the 144 patients was 69 years, 33% were female, and 64% had gastrointestinal cancer. The median survival from the first paracentesis procedure was 36 days. Eighty-nine (61.8%) and 55 (38.2%) patients were allocated to the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups, respectively. The median number of paracentesis procedures in the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups was 12 and 7, respectively (P=.001). The median survival in the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups was 50 and 44 days, respectively (P=.76). The multivariate analysis showed that the amount of drainage per session was not significantly associated with survival. Symptoms improved similarly in the 2 groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Paracentesis was demonstrated to be effective and safe, irrespective of the amount of fluid drained, for patients with malignant ascites in an acute care hospital. Thus, a strategy of limiting the amount of drainage is not associated with longer survival.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

癌症恶性腹水患者低容量腹水引流与提高生存率有关吗-一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:确定急性护理医院病房恶性腹水的穿刺量是否与生存率和症状缓解有关。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2022年4月期间癌症消化系统恶性腹水患者行穿刺置管术的病历资料。收集的数据包括每次穿刺的引流量、第一次穿刺的存活时间、症状和不良事件。根据每次穿刺的体积,我们将患者分为“小引流”(≤1500 mL)和“标准排水”(>1500 mL)组。结果:144例患者的中位年龄为69岁,33%为女性,64%为胃肠道癌症。第一次穿刺的中位生存期为36天。89名(61.8%)和55名(38.2%)患者分别被分配到小型引流组和标准引流组。小引流组和标准引流组穿刺术的中位次数分别为12次和7次(P=0.001)。小引流组的中位生存期和标准引流组织的中位存活期分别为50天和44天(P=.76)。多变量分析显示,每次穿刺的引流量与生存期无显著相关性。两组的症状改善情况相似。未观察到严重不良事件。结论:在急性护理医院,无论排出多少液体,穿刺对恶性腹水患者都是有效和安全的。因此,限制排水量的策略与更长的生存期无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信