Assessing the risk of magnetic interaction between auditory implants and programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-16 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2023.2166602
Manu Shrivastava, Ayeshah Abdul-Hamid, Gulam Zilani, Ali Qureishi, Sanjeeva Jeyaretna, Samuel Mackeith
{"title":"Assessing the risk of magnetic interaction between auditory implants and programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts.","authors":"Manu Shrivastava, Ayeshah Abdul-Hamid, Gulam Zilani, Ali Qureishi, Sanjeeva Jeyaretna, Samuel Mackeith","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2166602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated whether the magnetic field of the internal magnet of cochlear implants and bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) would be sufficient to affect a programmable ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Current guidelines suggest against implanting these hearing devices ipsilateral to a programmable VP shunt, but the exact nature of the interaction has not been quantified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The magnetic field strength (mT) was measured at 0 and 10 mm from the edge of both the Cochlear Implant CI512 (Cochlear Corporation) magnet and BAHA Attract magnet. Next, the hearing devices were placed into their anatomical positions in a 3-D clay model, along with three different types of programmable VP shunts. The valve setting was measured before and after exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 10 mm, neither device generated a magnetic field sufficient to adjust the VP shunt valve. In the clay model, the valve settings were not affected by the presence of any device.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither the cochlear implant nor the BAHA subcutaneous internal magnets generated sufficient magnetic field to reprogramme the valves of commonly used programmable VP shunts. The magnetic field from each device decreases dramatically at 10 mm. Further clinical studies to help mitigate the current restrictive guidance should consider involvement of VP shunt manufacturers to inform future shunt development and design.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"24 2","pages":"83-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2023.2166602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated whether the magnetic field of the internal magnet of cochlear implants and bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) would be sufficient to affect a programmable ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Current guidelines suggest against implanting these hearing devices ipsilateral to a programmable VP shunt, but the exact nature of the interaction has not been quantified.

Methods: The magnetic field strength (mT) was measured at 0 and 10 mm from the edge of both the Cochlear Implant CI512 (Cochlear Corporation) magnet and BAHA Attract magnet. Next, the hearing devices were placed into their anatomical positions in a 3-D clay model, along with three different types of programmable VP shunts. The valve setting was measured before and after exposure.

Results: At 10 mm, neither device generated a magnetic field sufficient to adjust the VP shunt valve. In the clay model, the valve settings were not affected by the presence of any device.

Conclusion: Neither the cochlear implant nor the BAHA subcutaneous internal magnets generated sufficient magnetic field to reprogramme the valves of commonly used programmable VP shunts. The magnetic field from each device decreases dramatically at 10 mm. Further clinical studies to help mitigate the current restrictive guidance should consider involvement of VP shunt manufacturers to inform future shunt development and design.

评估听觉植入物与可编程脑室腹腔分流器之间的磁场相互作用风险。
目的:本研究调查了人工耳蜗和骨固定助听器(BAHA)内部磁铁的磁场是否足以影响可编程脑室腹腔分流术(VP)。现行指南建议不要在可编程脑室腹腔分流术的同侧植入这些听力设备,但这种相互作用的确切性质尚未得到量化:方法:在距离 Cochlear Implant CI512(科利耳公司)磁铁和 BAHA Attract 磁铁边缘 0 毫米和 10 毫米处测量磁场强度(mT)。接着,将听力设备与三种不同类型的可编程 VP 分流器一起放入三维粘土模型的解剖位置。在暴露前后测量了阀门设置:结果:在 10 毫米处,两种设备都没有产生足以调节 VP 分流阀的磁场。在粘土模型中,瓣膜设置不受任何装置的影响:结论:无论是人工耳蜗还是 BAHA 皮下内部磁体都不会产生足够的磁场来重新编程常用的可编程 VP 分流瓣膜。每种设备的磁场在 10 毫米处都会急剧下降。进一步的临床研究有助于减少目前的限制性指导,应考虑让 VP 分流器制造商参与进来,为未来的分流器开发和设计提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信