The ever-growing case for clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia: an obligation for psychiatrists and psychiatry.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Robert A Bittner, Andreas Reif, Mishal Qubad
{"title":"The ever-growing case for clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia: an obligation for psychiatrists and psychiatry.","authors":"Robert A Bittner,&nbsp;Andreas Reif,&nbsp;Mishal Qubad","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Clozapine remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Although the evidence base for its wide-ranging, unique efficacy continues to expand, clozapine remains alarmingly underutilized in industrialized countries. Analyzing the causes and consequences of this problem is crucial for substantially improving the quality of care for TRS patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for reducing all-cause mortality in TRS. In most cases, treatment resistance emerges during the first psychotic episode. Delaying clozapine treatment has a negative impact on long-term outcome. Patients' experience with clozapine treatment is largely positive despite a comparatively high rate of side effects. Patients prefer clozapine, while psychiatrists regard it as a burden due to concerns regarding safety and side effect management. Shared decision-making (SDM), which increases the likelihood of a clozapine recommendation, is not routinely used, possibly due to stigmatization of TRS patients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The mortality-reducing effects of clozapine alone warrant its regular use. Therefore, psychiatrists must not exclude patients from the decision regarding a clozapine trial by not even offering it. Rather, they have a clear obligation to align their actions more closely with the existing evidence and patients' needs and to facilitate the timely initiation of clozapine.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":"36 4","pages":"327-336"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose of review: Clozapine remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Although the evidence base for its wide-ranging, unique efficacy continues to expand, clozapine remains alarmingly underutilized in industrialized countries. Analyzing the causes and consequences of this problem is crucial for substantially improving the quality of care for TRS patients.

Recent findings: Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for reducing all-cause mortality in TRS. In most cases, treatment resistance emerges during the first psychotic episode. Delaying clozapine treatment has a negative impact on long-term outcome. Patients' experience with clozapine treatment is largely positive despite a comparatively high rate of side effects. Patients prefer clozapine, while psychiatrists regard it as a burden due to concerns regarding safety and side effect management. Shared decision-making (SDM), which increases the likelihood of a clozapine recommendation, is not routinely used, possibly due to stigmatization of TRS patients.

Summary: The mortality-reducing effects of clozapine alone warrant its regular use. Therefore, psychiatrists must not exclude patients from the decision regarding a clozapine trial by not even offering it. Rather, they have a clear obligation to align their actions more closely with the existing evidence and patients' needs and to facilitate the timely initiation of clozapine.

氯氮平治疗精神分裂症的案例越来越多:精神科医生和精神病学的义务。
综述目的:氯氮平仍然是治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)的金标准。尽管氯氮平广泛而独特的疗效的证据基础在不断扩大,但在工业化国家,氯氮平的利用仍然不足,令人震惊。分析这一问题的原因和后果对于大幅度提高TRS患者的护理质量至关重要。最近发现:氯氮平是降低TRS全因死亡率最有效的抗精神病药。在大多数情况下,治疗抵抗出现在第一次精神病发作。延迟氯氮平治疗对长期预后有负面影响。患者对氯氮平治疗的经验基本上是积极的,尽管副作用率相对较高。患者更喜欢氯氮平,而精神科医生认为它是一种负担,因为考虑到安全性和副作用管理。共同决策(SDM)增加了推荐氯氮平的可能性,但并未常规使用,可能是由于TRS患者的污名化。总结:氯氮平单独使用降低死亡率的效果值得经常使用。因此,精神科医生不能通过甚至不提供氯氮平试验而将患者排除在有关试验的决定之外。相反,他们有明确的义务将他们的行动与现有证据和患者的需求更紧密地结合起来,并促进氯氮平的及时启动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信