Round-robin testing for LMO2 and MYC as immunohistochemical markers to screen MYC rearrangements in aggressive large B-cell lymphoma.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Virchows Archiv Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1007/s00428-023-03584-9
Natalia Papaleo, Fina Climent, Gustavo Tapia, Luis Luizaga, Juan Azcarate, Jan Bosch-Schips, Ana M Muñoz-Marmol, Marta Salido, Carmen Lome-Maldonado, Ivonne Vazquez, Luis Colomo
{"title":"Round-robin testing for LMO2 and MYC as immunohistochemical markers to screen MYC rearrangements in aggressive large B-cell lymphoma.","authors":"Natalia Papaleo, Fina Climent, Gustavo Tapia, Luis Luizaga, Juan Azcarate, Jan Bosch-Schips, Ana M Muñoz-Marmol, Marta Salido, Carmen Lome-Maldonado, Ivonne Vazquez, Luis Colomo","doi":"10.1007/s00428-023-03584-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (aLBCL) include a heterogeneous group of lymphomas with diverse biological features. One of the approaches to the diagnosis of aLBCL is based on the identification of MYC rearrangements (MYC-R), in addition to BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements by genetic techniques, mainly fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Because of the low incidence of MYC-R, the identification of useful immunohistochemistry markers to select cases for MYC FISH testing may be useful in daily practice. In a previous work, we identified a strong association between the profile CD10 positive/LMO2 negative expression and the presence of MYC-R in aLBCL and obtained good intralaboratory reproducibility. In this study, we wanted to evaluate external reproducibility. To evaluate whether LMO2 can be a reproducible marker between observers 50 aLBCL cases were circulated among 7 hematopathologists of 5 hospitals. Fleiss' kappa index for LMO2 and MYC were 0.87 and 0.70, respectively, indicating high agreement between observers. In addition, during 2021-2022, the enrolled centers included LMO2 in their diagnostic panels to evaluate prospectively the utility of the marker, and 213 cases were analyzed. Comparing LMO2 with MYC, the group of CD10 positive cases showed higher specificity (86% vs 79%), positive predictive value (66% vs 58%), likelihood positive value (5.47 vs 3.78), and accuracy (83% vs 79%), whereas the negative predictive values remained similar (90% vs 91%). These findings place LMO2 as a useful and reproducible marker to screen MYC-R in aLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03584-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (aLBCL) include a heterogeneous group of lymphomas with diverse biological features. One of the approaches to the diagnosis of aLBCL is based on the identification of MYC rearrangements (MYC-R), in addition to BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements by genetic techniques, mainly fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Because of the low incidence of MYC-R, the identification of useful immunohistochemistry markers to select cases for MYC FISH testing may be useful in daily practice. In a previous work, we identified a strong association between the profile CD10 positive/LMO2 negative expression and the presence of MYC-R in aLBCL and obtained good intralaboratory reproducibility. In this study, we wanted to evaluate external reproducibility. To evaluate whether LMO2 can be a reproducible marker between observers 50 aLBCL cases were circulated among 7 hematopathologists of 5 hospitals. Fleiss' kappa index for LMO2 and MYC were 0.87 and 0.70, respectively, indicating high agreement between observers. In addition, during 2021-2022, the enrolled centers included LMO2 in their diagnostic panels to evaluate prospectively the utility of the marker, and 213 cases were analyzed. Comparing LMO2 with MYC, the group of CD10 positive cases showed higher specificity (86% vs 79%), positive predictive value (66% vs 58%), likelihood positive value (5.47 vs 3.78), and accuracy (83% vs 79%), whereas the negative predictive values remained similar (90% vs 91%). These findings place LMO2 as a useful and reproducible marker to screen MYC-R in aLBCL.

将 LMO2 和 MYC 作为免疫组化标记进行循环测试,以筛查侵袭性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的 MYC 重排。
侵袭性大B细胞淋巴瘤(aLBCL)是一类具有不同生物学特征的异质性淋巴瘤。诊断 aLBCL 的方法之一是通过基因技术(主要是荧光原位杂交(FISH))鉴定 MYC 重排(MYC-R)以及 BCL2 和 BCL6 重排。由于MYC-R的发生率较低,因此在日常工作中识别有用的免疫组化标记物来选择进行MYC FISH检测的病例可能会很有用。在之前的一项研究中,我们发现在 aLBCL 中 CD10 阳性/LMO2 阴性表达与 MYC-R 存在之间有很强的关联性,并获得了良好的实验室内重现性。在本研究中,我们希望评估外部重现性。为了评估 LMO2 是否是观察者之间可重复的标志物,我们在 5 家医院的 7 位血液病理学家之间传阅了 50 个 aLBCL 病例。LMO2和MYC的Fleiss'kappa指数分别为0.87和0.70,表明观察者之间的一致性很高。此外,在2021-2022年期间,入组中心将LMO2纳入其诊断小组,对该标记物的效用进行了前瞻性评估,共分析了213个病例。将 LMO2 与 MYC 比较,CD10 阳性病例组显示出更高的特异性(86% vs 79%)、阳性预测值(66% vs 58%)、似然性阳性值(5.47 vs 3.78)和准确性(83% vs 79%),而阴性预测值保持相似(90% vs 91%)。这些发现使 LMO2 成为筛查 aLBCL 中 MYC-R 的有用且可重复的标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信