Plastic surgery online, how accessible are our units?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Cameron Clarke , Simon Filson
{"title":"Plastic surgery online, how accessible are our units?","authors":"Cameron Clarke ,&nbsp;Simon Filson","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of remote patient and professional communication. This has been especially important for highly specialised and regionally-based specialties such as plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to review how UK plastic surgery units represent themselves online and their phone accessibility.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>UK plastic surgery units were identified using the BAPRAS website and their websites and telephone accessibility assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Whilst a minority of units have clearly invested heavily in ensuring comprehensive webpages, nearly a third have no dedicated webpage at all. We found significant variation in quality and user-friendliness of online resources both for patients and for other healthcare professionals, with less than a quarter of units providing comprehensive contact details, emergency referral guidance, or information about changes to services due to Covid-19, to highlight a few areas. Communication with the BAPRAS website was also poor with less than half of web-links connecting to correct and relevant webpage and only 13.5% of phone numbers connecting directly to a useful plastic surgery number. In the phone component of our study we found that 47% of calls to ‘direct’ numbers went to voicemail but wait-times were significantly less than going through hospital switchboards and connections were more accurate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In a world where a business’ credibility is so heavily based on their online appearance and, in an increasingly online era of medicine, we hope that this study may be a resource for units to improve their web-based resources and prompt further research in enhancing patient experience online.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X23000574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of remote patient and professional communication. This has been especially important for highly specialised and regionally-based specialties such as plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to review how UK plastic surgery units represent themselves online and their phone accessibility.

Patients and methods

UK plastic surgery units were identified using the BAPRAS website and their websites and telephone accessibility assessed.

Results

Whilst a minority of units have clearly invested heavily in ensuring comprehensive webpages, nearly a third have no dedicated webpage at all. We found significant variation in quality and user-friendliness of online resources both for patients and for other healthcare professionals, with less than a quarter of units providing comprehensive contact details, emergency referral guidance, or information about changes to services due to Covid-19, to highlight a few areas. Communication with the BAPRAS website was also poor with less than half of web-links connecting to correct and relevant webpage and only 13.5% of phone numbers connecting directly to a useful plastic surgery number. In the phone component of our study we found that 47% of calls to ‘direct’ numbers went to voicemail but wait-times were significantly less than going through hospital switchboards and connections were more accurate.

Conclusion

In a world where a business’ credibility is so heavily based on their online appearance and, in an increasingly online era of medicine, we hope that this study may be a resource for units to improve their web-based resources and prompt further research in enhancing patient experience online.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在线整形手术,我们的单位有多方便?
2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了远程患者和专业沟通的重要性。这对于整形外科等高度专业化和区域性的专业尤其重要。这项研究的目的是回顾英国整形外科单位是如何在网上展示自己的,以及他们的手机可访问性。患者和方法通过BAPRAS网站确定suk整形外科单位,并评估其网站和电话可访问性。结果虽然少数单位在确保网页全面方面投入了大量资金,但近三分之一的单位根本没有专门的网页。我们发现,对于患者和其他医疗保健专业人员来说,在线资源的质量和用户友好性存在显著差异,只有不到四分之一的单位提供全面的联系方式、紧急转诊指导或关于Covid-19导致的服务变化的信息,以突出几个领域。与BAPRAS网站的沟通也很差,不到一半的网站链接连接到正确和相关的网页,只有13.5%的电话号码直接连接到有用的整形手术号码。在我们研究的电话部分,我们发现47%的“直接”电话都转到了语音信箱,但等待时间比通过医院总机要短得多,连接也更准确。在一个企业的信誉很大程度上取决于其在线外观的世界,在一个日益网络化的医学时代,我们希望这项研究可以成为单位改善其网络资源的资源,并推动进一步研究以增强在线患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信