Acceptability of Active Shooter Prevention Strategies on College and University Campuses.

Stacy L Carter, Nicole Noble, Jaehoon Lee, Xinyang Li, Charles Crews
{"title":"Acceptability of Active Shooter Prevention Strategies on College and University Campuses.","authors":"Stacy L Carter,&nbsp;Nicole Noble,&nbsp;Jaehoon Lee,&nbsp;Xinyang Li,&nbsp;Charles Crews","doi":"10.1007/s10935-022-00705-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colleges and universities are challenged with making their campuses safe from many threats of violence such as active shooters by using strategies that are effective and acceptable to their campus communities. Implementing strategies that are ineffective can waste resources and implementing strategies that are unacceptable may result in students, faculty, and staff that protest or leave the campus. The current study evaluated the acceptability of 11 different strategies to prevent active shooters on college/university campuses. Self-efficacy of the participants was measured to determine influences on acceptability ratings along with other demographic variables such as gender, race, and education levels. Results revealed differences in acceptability of active shooter prevention procedures and demographic variable influences. Implications for designing prevention measures on college and university campuses are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention (2022)","volume":"44 2","pages":"165-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-022-00705-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colleges and universities are challenged with making their campuses safe from many threats of violence such as active shooters by using strategies that are effective and acceptable to their campus communities. Implementing strategies that are ineffective can waste resources and implementing strategies that are unacceptable may result in students, faculty, and staff that protest or leave the campus. The current study evaluated the acceptability of 11 different strategies to prevent active shooters on college/university campuses. Self-efficacy of the participants was measured to determine influences on acceptability ratings along with other demographic variables such as gender, race, and education levels. Results revealed differences in acceptability of active shooter prevention procedures and demographic variable influences. Implications for designing prevention measures on college and university campuses are discussed.

Abstract Image

高校校园主动枪手预防策略的可接受性。
学院和大学面临的挑战是,通过使用有效且为校园社区所接受的策略,使校园免受许多暴力威胁,例如活跃的枪手。实施无效的策略会浪费资源,而实施不可接受的策略可能会导致学生、教师和员工抗议或离开校园。目前的研究评估了11种不同的策略的可接受性,以防止活跃的枪手在大学校园。研究人员测量了参与者的自我效能感,以确定对可接受度评级的影响,以及其他人口统计学变量,如性别、种族和教育水平。结果显示,预防主动枪手程序的可接受性和人口统计学变量的影响存在差异。探讨了高校校园预防措施设计的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信