[Effectiveness of letter and telephone reminders for specific health guidance use: A randomized controlled trial for those intending to use health guidance in a large city].

Hiroshi Murayama, Seitaro Shimada, Yuta Takahashi
{"title":"[Effectiveness of letter and telephone reminders for specific health guidance use: A randomized controlled trial for those intending to use health guidance in a large city].","authors":"Hiroshi Murayama,&nbsp;Seitaro Shimada,&nbsp;Yuta Takahashi","doi":"10.11236/jph.22-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives Medical insurers have applied a reminder (i.e., recall) system to improve the implementation rate of specific health guidance. However, the effectiveness of the system has not been verified. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of two methods of specific health guidance reminders (i.e., letter and telephone) using a randomized controlled trial.Methods Subscribers of National Health Insurance in Yokohama City, Kanagawa Prefecture, who were eligible for specific health guidance in 2020, were recruited. A specific health examination questionnaire was used to identify participants intending to use health guidance. The intervention period was from September to November 2020, with 252 people being randomly assigned to one of the three groups: a \"no-reminder group,\" \"a letter-reminder group,\" or \"a telephone-reminder group\" (84 people each). Those in the letter-reminder group received a reminder by mail and those in the telephone-reminder group received a reminder by phone from a public health nurse two weeks after the specific health guidance coupon was sent to the participants by mail. The outcome showed the utilization rate of specific health guidance. Chi-square tests were performed to compare the three groups and conduct multiple comparisons (post-hoc test).Results The participants had a mean age of 61.4±11.0 years and 70.6% were male. There was no difference among the three groups in terms of demographic characteristics and the results of specific health examinations. The utilization rates of specific health guidance were 20.2% in the no-reminder group, 22.6% in the letter-reminder group, and 20.2% in the telephone-reminder group; thus, the three groups did not significantly differ (χ<sup>2</sup>=0.191, P=0.909). Multiple comparisons also showed no difference between any two groups. However, in the telephonereminder group, 56.0% of the participants themselves or their family members could be reached by a public health nurse, and their utilization rate was higher than those participants whom a public health nurse could not reach.Conclusion Neither letter nor telephone reminders changed the participants' utilization rates of specific health guidance compared to those with no reminder. Although the effectiveness of a telephone reminder might be underestimated, this study suggests setting a lower priority in reminding those who intend to use health guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":"70 6","pages":"381-389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.22-107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Medical insurers have applied a reminder (i.e., recall) system to improve the implementation rate of specific health guidance. However, the effectiveness of the system has not been verified. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of two methods of specific health guidance reminders (i.e., letter and telephone) using a randomized controlled trial.Methods Subscribers of National Health Insurance in Yokohama City, Kanagawa Prefecture, who were eligible for specific health guidance in 2020, were recruited. A specific health examination questionnaire was used to identify participants intending to use health guidance. The intervention period was from September to November 2020, with 252 people being randomly assigned to one of the three groups: a "no-reminder group," "a letter-reminder group," or "a telephone-reminder group" (84 people each). Those in the letter-reminder group received a reminder by mail and those in the telephone-reminder group received a reminder by phone from a public health nurse two weeks after the specific health guidance coupon was sent to the participants by mail. The outcome showed the utilization rate of specific health guidance. Chi-square tests were performed to compare the three groups and conduct multiple comparisons (post-hoc test).Results The participants had a mean age of 61.4±11.0 years and 70.6% were male. There was no difference among the three groups in terms of demographic characteristics and the results of specific health examinations. The utilization rates of specific health guidance were 20.2% in the no-reminder group, 22.6% in the letter-reminder group, and 20.2% in the telephone-reminder group; thus, the three groups did not significantly differ (χ2=0.191, P=0.909). Multiple comparisons also showed no difference between any two groups. However, in the telephonereminder group, 56.0% of the participants themselves or their family members could be reached by a public health nurse, and their utilization rate was higher than those participants whom a public health nurse could not reach.Conclusion Neither letter nor telephone reminders changed the participants' utilization rates of specific health guidance compared to those with no reminder. Although the effectiveness of a telephone reminder might be underestimated, this study suggests setting a lower priority in reminding those who intend to use health guidance.

[信函和电话提醒使用特定健康指导的有效性:一项针对大城市中打算使用健康指导的人的随机对照试验]。
目的医疗保险公司运用提醒(即召回)制度,提高具体健康指导的执行率。然而,该系统的有效性尚未得到验证。本研究旨在采用随机对照试验的方法,检验信函和电话两种特定健康指导提醒方法的有效性。方法选取神奈川县横滨市符合2020年专项健康指导条件的国民健康保险参保人。使用一份特定的健康检查问卷来确定打算使用健康指导的参与者。干预期为2020年9月至11月,252人被随机分配到三组中的一组:“无提醒组”、“信件提醒组”或“电话提醒组”(每组84人)。在特定的健康指导券通过邮件发送给参与者两周后,信件提醒组的参与者收到了邮件提醒,电话提醒组的参与者收到了公共卫生护士的电话提醒。结果显示特定健康指导的使用率。采用卡方检验对三组进行比较,并进行多重比较(事后检验)。结果参与者平均年龄61.4±11.0岁,男性占70.6%。在人口统计学特征和特定健康检查结果方面,三组之间没有差异。具体健康指导的使用率无提示组为20.2%,信提醒组为22.6%,电话提醒组为20.2%;因此,三组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.191, P=0.909)。多次比较也显示两组之间没有差异。而在电话提醒组中,56.0%的参与者本人或其家庭成员可以被公共卫生护士联系到,其使用率高于公共卫生护士无法联系到的参与者。结论信函和电话提醒与没有提醒的受试者相比,对特定健康指导的使用率没有影响。尽管电话提醒的有效性可能被低估了,但这项研究建议,提醒那些打算使用健康指导的人的优先级要低一些。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信