Reproductive Coercion Among Women With Disabilities: An Analysis of Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Systems Data.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Journal of Forensic Nursing Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-14 DOI:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000421
Vanessa Amos, Genevieve R Lyons, Kathryn Laughon, Rosemary B Hughes, Jeanne L Alhusen
{"title":"Reproductive Coercion Among Women With Disabilities: An Analysis of Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Systems Data.","authors":"Vanessa Amos, Genevieve R Lyons, Kathryn Laughon, Rosemary B Hughes, Jeanne L Alhusen","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Reproductive coercion (RC) is a widespread yet understudied type of intimate partner violence that is associated with numerous negative outcomes. Women with disabilities may be at an increased risk of RC; however, little research has been conducted among this population. Using population-based data, we sought to examine the prevalence of RC in postpartum women with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a nationally representative survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in partnership with participating states. These analyses include 3,117 respondents who had information on both disability status and experiences of RC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 1.9% of respondents reported experiencing RC (95% CI [1.3, 2.4]). When stratified by disability status, approximately 1.7% of respondents without a disability reported RC whereas 6.2% of respondents with at least one disability reported RC ( p < 0.001). In univariable logistic models, disability, age, education, relationship status, income, and race were all significantly associated with RC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for healthcare providers working with women with disabilities to screen for RC and potentially uncover intimate partner violence and prevent its negative health consequences. All states participating in Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data collection are urged to incorporate measures of RC and disability status to better address this significant issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":51324,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","volume":"19 2","pages":"108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Reproductive coercion (RC) is a widespread yet understudied type of intimate partner violence that is associated with numerous negative outcomes. Women with disabilities may be at an increased risk of RC; however, little research has been conducted among this population. Using population-based data, we sought to examine the prevalence of RC in postpartum women with disabilities.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a nationally representative survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in partnership with participating states. These analyses include 3,117 respondents who had information on both disability status and experiences of RC.

Results: Approximately 1.9% of respondents reported experiencing RC (95% CI [1.3, 2.4]). When stratified by disability status, approximately 1.7% of respondents without a disability reported RC whereas 6.2% of respondents with at least one disability reported RC ( p < 0.001). In univariable logistic models, disability, age, education, relationship status, income, and race were all significantly associated with RC.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need for healthcare providers working with women with disabilities to screen for RC and potentially uncover intimate partner violence and prevent its negative health consequences. All states participating in Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data collection are urged to incorporate measures of RC and disability status to better address this significant issue.

残疾妇女的生殖胁迫:妊娠风险评估监测系统数据分析》。
背景/目的:生殖胁迫(RC)是一种普遍存在但研究不足的亲密伴侣暴力类型,与许多负面结果相关。残疾妇女遭受 RC 的风险可能会增加;然而,针对这一人群的研究却很少。我们试图利用基于人口的数据来研究产后残疾妇女的 RC 发生率:这是对妊娠风险评估监测系统这一横断面调查的二次分析,该系统是由美国疾病控制和预防中心与参与州合作开展的一项具有全国代表性的调查。这些分析包括 3,117 名受访者,他们都提供了有关残疾状况和 RC 经历的信息:约有 1.9% 的受访者表示有过 RC 经历(95% CI [1.3, 2.4])。根据残疾状况进行分层后,约 1.7% 的无残疾受访者报告了 RC,而 6.2% 的至少有一项残疾的受访者报告了 RC ( p < 0.001)。在单变量逻辑模型中,残疾、年龄、教育程度、关系状况、收入和种族均与 RC 显著相关:我们的研究结果突出表明,为残疾妇女提供服务的医疗保健提供者有必要对 RC 进行筛查,并有可能发现亲密伴侣暴力,防止其对健康造成负面影响。我们敦促所有参与妊娠风险评估监测系统数据收集的州纳入 RC 和残疾状况的测量指标,以更好地应对这一重大问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Nursing (JFN) the official journal of the International Association of Forensic Nurses, is a groundbreaking publication that addresses health care issues that transcend health and legal systems by articulating nursing’s response to violence. The journal features empirical studies, review and theoretical articles, methodological and concept papers, and case reports that address the provision of care to victims and perpetrators of violence, trauma, and abuse. Topics include interpersonal violence (sexual assault, abuse, intimate partner violence); death investigation; legal and ethical issues; forensic mental health nursing; correctional nursing; and emergency and trauma nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信