Measurement Invariance in Longitudinal Bifactor Models: Review and Application Based on the p Factor.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1177/10731911231182687
Sharon A S Neufeld, Michelle St Clair, Jeannette Brodbeck, Paul O Wilkinson, Ian M Goodyer, Peter B Jones
{"title":"Measurement Invariance in Longitudinal Bifactor Models: Review and Application Based on the <i>p</i> Factor.","authors":"Sharon A S Neufeld, Michelle St Clair, Jeannette Brodbeck, Paul O Wilkinson, Ian M Goodyer, Peter B Jones","doi":"10.1177/10731911231182687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bifactor models are increasingly being utilized to study latent constructs such as psychopathology and cognition, which change over the lifespan. Although longitudinal measurement invariance (MI) testing helps ensure valid interpretation of change in a construct over time, this is rarely and inconsistently performed in bifactor models. Our review of MI simulation literature revealed that only one study assessed MI in bifactor models under limited conditions. Recommendations for how to assess MI in bifactor models are suggested based on existing simulation studies of related models. Estimator choice and influence of missing data on MI are also discussed. An empirical example based on a model of the general psychopathology factor (<i>p</i>) elucidates our recommendations, with the present model of <i>p</i> being the first to exhibit residual MI across gender and time. Thus, changes in the ordered-categorical indicators can be attributed to changes in the latent factors. However, further work is needed to clarify MI guidelines for bifactor models, including considering the impact of model complexity and number of indicators. Nonetheless, using the guidelines justified herein to establish MI allows findings from bifactor models to be more confidently interpreted, increasing their comparability and utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11092300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231182687","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bifactor models are increasingly being utilized to study latent constructs such as psychopathology and cognition, which change over the lifespan. Although longitudinal measurement invariance (MI) testing helps ensure valid interpretation of change in a construct over time, this is rarely and inconsistently performed in bifactor models. Our review of MI simulation literature revealed that only one study assessed MI in bifactor models under limited conditions. Recommendations for how to assess MI in bifactor models are suggested based on existing simulation studies of related models. Estimator choice and influence of missing data on MI are also discussed. An empirical example based on a model of the general psychopathology factor (p) elucidates our recommendations, with the present model of p being the first to exhibit residual MI across gender and time. Thus, changes in the ordered-categorical indicators can be attributed to changes in the latent factors. However, further work is needed to clarify MI guidelines for bifactor models, including considering the impact of model complexity and number of indicators. Nonetheless, using the guidelines justified herein to establish MI allows findings from bifactor models to be more confidently interpreted, increasing their comparability and utility.

纵向双因素模型的测量不变性:基于 p 因子的回顾与应用。
双因素模型越来越多地被用来研究潜在的构造,如心理病理学和认知,这些构造会随着生命周期的变化而变化。虽然纵向测量不变性(MI)测试有助于确保对建构随时间变化的有效解释,但在双因素模型中很少进行这种测试,而且测试结果也不一致。我们对测量不变性模拟文献的回顾发现,只有一项研究在有限的条件下评估了双因素模型中的测量不变性。基于现有的相关模型模拟研究,我们就如何评估双因素模型中的 MI 提出了建议。此外,还讨论了估计器的选择和缺失数据对 MI 的影响。一个基于一般精神病理学因子(p)模型的实证例子阐明了我们的建议,目前的 p 模型首次表现出跨性别和跨时间的残差 MI。因此,有序分类指标的变化可以归因于潜在因素的变化。然而,还需要进一步的工作来明确双因素模型的多元智能准则,包括考虑模型复杂性和指标数量的影响。尽管如此,使用本文所论证的准则来建立多元智能,可以更有把握地解释双因素模型的研究结果,提高其可比性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信