Cognitive distortions mediate relationships between early maladaptive schemas and aggression in women and men

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Li Shaun Huang, Pascal Molenberghs, Alexander J. Mussap
{"title":"Cognitive distortions mediate relationships between early maladaptive schemas and aggression in women and men","authors":"Li Shaun Huang,&nbsp;Pascal Molenberghs,&nbsp;Alexander J. Mussap","doi":"10.1002/ab.22083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Difficult childhood experiences can lead to the development of early maladaptive schemas (EMS) that cause emotional and behavioral problems later in life. The present study examined the role of cognitive distortions in mediating relationships between EMS and aggression in adults as a function of sex. Participants were 59 women (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34.7 years, standard deviation [<i>SD</i>] = 8.0) and 86 men (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 39.3 years, <i>SD</i> = 13.2) who completed the Young Schema Questionnaire—Short Form-V3, the How I Think Questionnaire of cognitive distortions, and the Buss–Warren Aggression Questionnaire. Multiple mediation analysis identified EMS domain <i>impaired limits</i> to be uniquely and directly related to aggression, and the domain <i>impaired autonomy</i> to be indirectly related via a range of cognitive distortions. Multigroup analyses revealed no sex differences in these relationships, and analysis of covariance with age as a covariate revealed no sex differences in levels of EMS, cognitive distortion, or aggression. The results suggest that impaired limits and impaired autonomy are EMS domains of relevance to aggression regardless of sex. Furthermore, in the case of impaired autonomy, self-serving, proaggression cognitive distortions appear to be involved. Interventions for aggression may thus benefit by focusing on clients with entitlement/grandiosity traits indicative of impaired limits, and vulnerability/dependence traits indicative of impaired autonomy, and in the latter case consider addressing the self-serving cognitions that enable the expression of aggression in these clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50842,"journal":{"name":"Aggressive Behavior","volume":"49 4","pages":"418-430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ab.22083","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggressive Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ab.22083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Difficult childhood experiences can lead to the development of early maladaptive schemas (EMS) that cause emotional and behavioral problems later in life. The present study examined the role of cognitive distortions in mediating relationships between EMS and aggression in adults as a function of sex. Participants were 59 women (Mage = 34.7 years, standard deviation [SD] = 8.0) and 86 men (Mage = 39.3 years, SD = 13.2) who completed the Young Schema Questionnaire—Short Form-V3, the How I Think Questionnaire of cognitive distortions, and the Buss–Warren Aggression Questionnaire. Multiple mediation analysis identified EMS domain impaired limits to be uniquely and directly related to aggression, and the domain impaired autonomy to be indirectly related via a range of cognitive distortions. Multigroup analyses revealed no sex differences in these relationships, and analysis of covariance with age as a covariate revealed no sex differences in levels of EMS, cognitive distortion, or aggression. The results suggest that impaired limits and impaired autonomy are EMS domains of relevance to aggression regardless of sex. Furthermore, in the case of impaired autonomy, self-serving, proaggression cognitive distortions appear to be involved. Interventions for aggression may thus benefit by focusing on clients with entitlement/grandiosity traits indicative of impaired limits, and vulnerability/dependence traits indicative of impaired autonomy, and in the latter case consider addressing the self-serving cognitions that enable the expression of aggression in these clients.

Abstract Image

认知扭曲介导了早期适应不良图式与男性和女性攻击行为之间的关系
困难的童年经历会导致早期适应不良图式(EMS)的发展,从而在以后的生活中引发情绪和行为问题。本研究考察了认知扭曲在作为性功能的成年人EMS和攻击性之间的中介关系中的作用。参与者为59名女性(Mage = 34.7年,标准差[SD] = 8.0)和86人(法师 = 39.3岁,SD = 13.2)谁完成了Young Schema问卷——Short Form-V3、认知扭曲的我如何思考问卷和Buss-Warren攻击性问卷。多重中介分析发现,EMS领域受损极限与攻击性唯一且直接相关,领域受损自主性通过一系列认知扭曲间接相关。多组分析显示,在这些关系中没有性别差异,以年龄为协变量的协方差分析显示,EMS、认知扭曲或攻击水平没有性别差异。研究结果表明,无论性别如何,极限受损和自主性受损都是与攻击相关的EMS领域。此外,在自主性受损的情况下,似乎涉及到自私、主动侵犯的认知扭曲。因此,针对攻击性的干预措施可以通过关注具有权利/宏大特征的客户来受益,这些特征表明限制受损,而脆弱性/依赖性特征表明自主性受损,在后一种情况下,可以考虑解决使这些客户能够表达攻击性的自私认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aggressive Behavior
Aggressive Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aggressive Behavior will consider manuscripts in the English language concerning the fields of Animal Behavior, Anthropology, Ethology, Psychiatry, Psychobiology, Psychology, and Sociology which relate to either overt or implied conflict behaviors. Papers concerning mechanisms underlying or influencing behaviors generally regarded as aggressive and the physiological and/or behavioral consequences of being subject to such behaviors will fall within the scope of the journal. Review articles will be considered as well as empirical and theoretical articles. Aggressive Behavior is the official journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信