Adherence of healthcare workers to COVID-19 infection prevention practices and its relationship with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.

IF 0.9 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Infection Prevention Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1177/17571774231158782
Engy Mohamed El-Ghitany, Ayat Ashour, Hala Elmorshedy, Azza Galal Farghaly, Mona H Hashish, Eman A Omran
{"title":"Adherence of healthcare workers to COVID-19 infection prevention practices and its relationship with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.","authors":"Engy Mohamed El-Ghitany, Ayat Ashour, Hala Elmorshedy, Azza Galal Farghaly, Mona H Hashish, Eman A Omran","doi":"10.1177/17571774231158782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection prevention and control (IPC) practices against COVID-19 should be adopted by healthcare workers (HCWs) at their workplaces to protect themselves, their patients, and their families from infection.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to describe the relationship between the healthcare-related COVID-19 infection prevention measures adopted by HCWs and their SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted during the second and third COVID-19 waves in Egypt.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The study included 416 unvaccinated HCWs from 39 hospitals in Egypt.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>Sociodemographic data, as well as COVID-19 IPC measures done at work, and protective measures performed by their healthcare facilities were collected. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies were measured by ELISA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58.2% of participants were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2. Among the previously undiagnosed HCWs, 125/271 (46.1%) were seropositive. Predictors of seropositivity were rural residence (aOR = 5.096; 95% CI: 1.583-16.403, <i>p</i> = 0.006), previous COVID-19 infection (aOR = 4.848, 95% CI: 2.933-8.015, <i>p</i> = 0.000), and examining 10-20 suspected COVID-19 patients daily (aOR = 2.329; 95% CI: 1.331-4.077, <i>p</i> = 0.003. Reporting low satisfaction (25-50%) with infection control implementation, working more than 40 h per week, reporting to \"sometimes abiding by hand hygiene\" compared to those who reported to \"always\" adhere to hand hygiene and shorter duration of hand washing (<20 s) were associated with significantly higher odds of seropositivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poor infection control measures and the high workload of HCWs (longer working hours and examining more patients) were modifiable risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among HCWs. Hand hygiene was better among HCWs working in urban <i>versus</i> rural areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988594/pdf/10.1177_17571774231158782.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774231158782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) practices against COVID-19 should be adopted by healthcare workers (HCWs) at their workplaces to protect themselves, their patients, and their families from infection.

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the relationship between the healthcare-related COVID-19 infection prevention measures adopted by HCWs and their SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.

Research design: This cross-sectional study was conducted during the second and third COVID-19 waves in Egypt.

Study sample: The study included 416 unvaccinated HCWs from 39 hospitals in Egypt.

Data collection: Sociodemographic data, as well as COVID-19 IPC measures done at work, and protective measures performed by their healthcare facilities were collected. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies were measured by ELISA.

Results: 58.2% of participants were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2. Among the previously undiagnosed HCWs, 125/271 (46.1%) were seropositive. Predictors of seropositivity were rural residence (aOR = 5.096; 95% CI: 1.583-16.403, p = 0.006), previous COVID-19 infection (aOR = 4.848, 95% CI: 2.933-8.015, p = 0.000), and examining 10-20 suspected COVID-19 patients daily (aOR = 2.329; 95% CI: 1.331-4.077, p = 0.003. Reporting low satisfaction (25-50%) with infection control implementation, working more than 40 h per week, reporting to "sometimes abiding by hand hygiene" compared to those who reported to "always" adhere to hand hygiene and shorter duration of hand washing (<20 s) were associated with significantly higher odds of seropositivity.

Conclusions: Poor infection control measures and the high workload of HCWs (longer working hours and examining more patients) were modifiable risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among HCWs. Hand hygiene was better among HCWs working in urban versus rural areas.

医护人员遵守 COVID-19 感染预防措施的情况及其与 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性反应的关系。
背景:目的:本研究旨在描述医护人员采取的与医护相关的COVID-19感染预防措施与其SARS-CoV-2血清阳性之间的关系:这项横断面研究是在埃及第二波和第三波 COVID-19 期间进行的:研究样本:包括来自埃及 39 家医院的 416 名未接种疫苗的医护人员:数据收集:收集社会人口学数据、工作中采取的 COVID-19 IPC 措施以及医疗机构采取的保护措施。采用 ELISA 方法检测 SARS-CoV-2 尖峰蛋白抗体:结果:58.2%的参与者SARS-CoV-2血清反应呈阳性。结果:58.2%的参与者SARS-CoV-2血清反应呈阳性,其中125人/271人(46.1%)的血清反应呈阳性。血清阳性的预测因素包括农村居民(aOR = 5.096;95% CI:1.583-16.403,p = 0.006)、曾感染 COVID-19(aOR = 4.848,95% CI:2.933-8.015,p = 0.000)和每天检查 10-20 名疑似 COVID-19 患者(aOR = 2.329;95% CI:1.331-4.077,p = 0.003)。感染控制实施满意度低(25%-50%),每周工作时间超过 40 小时,与 "始终 "遵守手部卫生的人员相比,"有时 "遵守手部卫生,洗手时间较短(结论:感染控制措施不完善、工作量大、工作时间长,这些因素都会影响感染控制的实施:感染控制措施不完善和医护人员工作量大(工作时间长、检查病人多)是导致医护人员出现 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性的可改变的风险因素。在城市工作的医护人员的手部卫生状况要好于在农村地区工作的医护人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信