Residents Can Do It! A Training Program in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery for General Surgery Residents.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Calin Popa, Nasser Abdul Halim, Cosmin Pestean, Ciprian Ober, Radu Elisei, Tareg Al Momani, Diana Schlanger, Florin Graur, Florin Zaharie, Nadim Al Hajjar
{"title":"Residents Can Do It! A Training Program in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery for General Surgery Residents.","authors":"Calin Popa,&nbsp;Nasser Abdul Halim,&nbsp;Cosmin Pestean,&nbsp;Ciprian Ober,&nbsp;Radu Elisei,&nbsp;Tareg Al Momani,&nbsp;Diana Schlanger,&nbsp;Florin Graur,&nbsp;Florin Zaharie,&nbsp;Nadim Al Hajjar","doi":"10.1159/000528691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) constitute an area of surgery that has been kept away from residents in their hands-on training. The aim of our study is to assess the feasibility and the value of a didactic \"step-by-step\" program for LLR performed by residents using the swine training model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2018 to November 2019, three hands-on workshops were held. The protocol involved the performance of cholecystectomy, liver mobilization, minor and major hepatectomies. The participants' performance results in terms of operative time, blood loss, conversion, trainers' intervention, and intraoperative mortality, were recorded. The first workshop was comprised of 30 residents who previously participated in laparoscopic surgery workshops. In the second workshop, after six residents dropped out due to residency completion, the findings for the remaining 24 residents were compared to those for 24 junior-attending surgeons who did not follow the protocol and had not performed LLR previously, and to another 24 residents in a third workshop, who had not taken the training program before but followed the protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All residents fully completed the surgical procedures. Trained residents achieved better operative times and less blood loss compared to junior-attending surgeons (p < 0.017), however, the remaining parameters were comparable. When compared to non-trained residents, those who underwent training achieved significantly better results only in operative times (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A continuous LLR \"step-by-step\" training program on swine for residents is feasible and the \"step-by-step\" protocol is a valuable tool for a proper surgical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":"64 2","pages":"237-245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) constitute an area of surgery that has been kept away from residents in their hands-on training. The aim of our study is to assess the feasibility and the value of a didactic "step-by-step" program for LLR performed by residents using the swine training model.

Methods: From May 2018 to November 2019, three hands-on workshops were held. The protocol involved the performance of cholecystectomy, liver mobilization, minor and major hepatectomies. The participants' performance results in terms of operative time, blood loss, conversion, trainers' intervention, and intraoperative mortality, were recorded. The first workshop was comprised of 30 residents who previously participated in laparoscopic surgery workshops. In the second workshop, after six residents dropped out due to residency completion, the findings for the remaining 24 residents were compared to those for 24 junior-attending surgeons who did not follow the protocol and had not performed LLR previously, and to another 24 residents in a third workshop, who had not taken the training program before but followed the protocol.

Results: All residents fully completed the surgical procedures. Trained residents achieved better operative times and less blood loss compared to junior-attending surgeons (p < 0.017), however, the remaining parameters were comparable. When compared to non-trained residents, those who underwent training achieved significantly better results only in operative times (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: A continuous LLR "step-by-step" training program on swine for residents is feasible and the "step-by-step" protocol is a valuable tool for a proper surgical education.

居民可以做到!普通外科住院医师腹腔镜肝脏手术训练计划。
简介:腹腔镜肝切除术(LLRs)是住院医生在实践培训中一直远离的手术领域。本研究的目的是评估由居民使用养猪训练模型进行LLR教学“循序渐进”计划的可行性和价值。方法:2018年5月至2019年11月举办3次实践工作坊。该方案涉及胆囊切除术,肝脏动员,小肝和大肝切除术的表现。记录参与者在手术时间、出血量、转换、教练干预和术中死亡率方面的表现结果。第一个讲习班由30名以前参加过腹腔镜手术讲习班的住院医生组成。在第二次研讨会中,在6名住院医师因实习期结束而退出后,将剩下的24名住院医师的研究结果与24名未遵循协议且未执行过LLR的初级主治医生的研究结果进行比较,并与第三次研讨会中另外24名之前未接受培训但遵循协议的住院医师的研究结果进行比较。结果:所有住院医师全部完成手术。与初级主治外科医生相比,训练有素的住院医师获得了更好的手术时间和更少的出血量(p < 0.017),然而,其余参数具有可比性。与未接受培训的住院医师相比,接受培训的住院医师仅在手术时间上取得了显著更好的结果(p < 0.001)。结论:对住院猪进行连续的LLR“分步”培训计划是可行的,“分步”方案是正确的外科教育的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信