Effects of supportive and minimalist footwear on standing balance and walking stability in older women.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ameer Nor Azhar, Shannon E Munteanu, Hylton B Menz
{"title":"Effects of supportive and minimalist footwear on standing balance and walking stability in older women.","authors":"Ameer Nor Azhar,&nbsp;Shannon E Munteanu,&nbsp;Hylton B Menz","doi":"10.1186/s13047-023-00634-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Footwear has been shown to influence balance and is an important consideration in relation to the prevention of falls. However, it remains unclear as to what type of footwear is most beneficial for balance in older people: sturdy, supportive footwear, or minimalist footwear to maximise plantar sensory input. The objectives of this study were therefore to compare standing balance and walking stability in older women wearing these two footwear styles, and to investigate participants' perceptions in relation to comfort, ease of use and fit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older women (n = 20) aged 66 to 82 years (mean 73.4, SD 3.9) performed a series of laboratory tests of standing balance (eyes open and closed on floor and foam rubber mat, near tandem standing) and walking stability (treadmill, level and irregular surface) using a wearable sensor motion analysis system. Participants were tested wearing supportive footwear (incorporating design features to improve balance) and minimalist footwear. Perceptions of the footwear were documented using structured questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in balance performance between the supportive and minimalist footwear. Participants perceived the supportive footwear to be significantly more attractive to self and others, easier to put on and off but heavier compared to the minimalist footwear. Overall comfort was similar between the footwear conditions, although the supportive footwear was reported to be significantly more comfortable in the heel, arch height, heel cup, heel width and forefoot width regions. Eighteen participants (90%) reported that they felt more stable in the supportive footwear and 17 (85%) reported that they would consider wearing them to reduce their risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Balance performance and walking stability were similar in supportive footwear designed to reduce the risk of falling and minimalist footwear, although participants preferred the supportive footwear in relation to aesthetics, ease of use, comfort and perceived stability. Prospective studies are now required to ascertain the longer-term advantages and disadvantages of these footwear styles on comfort and stability in older people.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. ACTRN12622001257752p, 20/9/2022 (prospectively registered).</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00634-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Footwear has been shown to influence balance and is an important consideration in relation to the prevention of falls. However, it remains unclear as to what type of footwear is most beneficial for balance in older people: sturdy, supportive footwear, or minimalist footwear to maximise plantar sensory input. The objectives of this study were therefore to compare standing balance and walking stability in older women wearing these two footwear styles, and to investigate participants' perceptions in relation to comfort, ease of use and fit.

Methods: Older women (n = 20) aged 66 to 82 years (mean 73.4, SD 3.9) performed a series of laboratory tests of standing balance (eyes open and closed on floor and foam rubber mat, near tandem standing) and walking stability (treadmill, level and irregular surface) using a wearable sensor motion analysis system. Participants were tested wearing supportive footwear (incorporating design features to improve balance) and minimalist footwear. Perceptions of the footwear were documented using structured questionnaires.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in balance performance between the supportive and minimalist footwear. Participants perceived the supportive footwear to be significantly more attractive to self and others, easier to put on and off but heavier compared to the minimalist footwear. Overall comfort was similar between the footwear conditions, although the supportive footwear was reported to be significantly more comfortable in the heel, arch height, heel cup, heel width and forefoot width regions. Eighteen participants (90%) reported that they felt more stable in the supportive footwear and 17 (85%) reported that they would consider wearing them to reduce their risk of falling.

Conclusion: Balance performance and walking stability were similar in supportive footwear designed to reduce the risk of falling and minimalist footwear, although participants preferred the supportive footwear in relation to aesthetics, ease of use, comfort and perceived stability. Prospective studies are now required to ascertain the longer-term advantages and disadvantages of these footwear styles on comfort and stability in older people.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. ACTRN12622001257752p, 20/9/2022 (prospectively registered).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

支持和极简鞋对老年妇女站立平衡和行走稳定性的影响。
背景:鞋类已被证明会影响平衡,是预防跌倒的重要考虑因素。然而,目前还不清楚哪种类型的鞋子对老年人的平衡最有益:坚固的、支持性的鞋子,还是最小化的鞋子,以最大限度地提高足底感官输入。因此,本研究的目的是比较老年妇女穿着这两种鞋的站立平衡和行走稳定性,并调查参与者对舒适性,易用性和合脚性的看法。方法:老年女性(n = 20),年龄66 ~ 82岁(平均73.4,SD 3.9),采用可穿戴传感器运动分析系统进行站立平衡(在地板和泡沫橡胶垫上睁眼和闭眼,近双排站立)和行走稳定性(跑步机,水平和不规则地面)的一系列实验室测试。参与者穿着支持性的鞋子(结合设计特点来改善平衡)和极简主义的鞋子进行测试。使用结构化问卷记录了对鞋类的看法。结果:支持型和极简型鞋在平衡性能上无统计学差异。参与者认为,与极简风格的鞋子相比,支持型的鞋子对自己和他人都更有吸引力,更容易穿脱,但更重。两种鞋子的总体舒适度相似,但据报道,支持性鞋子在鞋跟、足弓高度、鞋跟杯、鞋跟宽度和前足宽度区域明显更舒适。18名参与者(90%)报告说,他们觉得穿支撑鞋更稳定,17名参与者(85%)报告说,他们会考虑穿这种鞋来降低摔倒的风险。结论:平衡性能和行走稳定性在旨在降低跌倒风险的支持性鞋类和极简主义鞋类中是相似的,尽管参与者更喜欢支持性鞋类在美学、易用性、舒适性和感知稳定性方面。现在需要进行前瞻性研究,以确定这些鞋类风格对老年人的舒适性和稳定性的长期优势和劣势。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心。ACTRN12622001257752p, 20/9/2022(已注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信