Plasma Aβ biomarker for early diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease - a systematic review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2023-05-10
Svend Ubbe Ebbesen, Peter Høgh, Ivan Zibrandtsen
{"title":"Plasma Aβ biomarker for early diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease - a systematic review.","authors":"Svend Ubbe Ebbesen,&nbsp;Peter Høgh,&nbsp;Ivan Zibrandtsen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide and a cost-effective diagnostic biomarker is needed. This systematic review provides an overview of the current research on plasma amyloid beta (Aβ) as a biomarker of AD and explores the clinical implications of this line of research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed was searched using the keywords plasma Aβ and AD from 2017 to 2021. Only clinical studies involving amyloid PET (aPET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker analysis (or both) were included. A meta-analysis of CSF Aβ42/40 ratio, aPET and plasma Aβ42/40 ratio was conducted when possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 articles were identified. Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio was inversely correlated with aPET positivity r = -0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.65--0.31). In numerous studies, plasma Aβ42/40 ratio was also found to be directly correlated with CSF Aβ42 and CSF Aβ42/40 ratio r = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.30-0.69). Three studies found plasma Aβ42 to be positively associated with aPET positivity and CSF Aβ42; however, four other studies found no significant association between these variables. Seven studies reported no significant association of plasma Aβ40 with aPET or CSF Aβ40.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio seems as a promising plasma biomarker as it significantly correlates inversely with aPET positivity and directly with CSF Aβ42 and CSF Aβ42/40 ratio. However, more research is warranted, including validation studies, longitudinally clinical studies, studies comparing measurement methods and studies of Aβ kinetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"70 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide and a cost-effective diagnostic biomarker is needed. This systematic review provides an overview of the current research on plasma amyloid beta (Aβ) as a biomarker of AD and explores the clinical implications of this line of research.

Methods: PubMed was searched using the keywords plasma Aβ and AD from 2017 to 2021. Only clinical studies involving amyloid PET (aPET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker analysis (or both) were included. A meta-analysis of CSF Aβ42/40 ratio, aPET and plasma Aβ42/40 ratio was conducted when possible.

Results: A total of 17 articles were identified. Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio was inversely correlated with aPET positivity r = -0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.65--0.31). In numerous studies, plasma Aβ42/40 ratio was also found to be directly correlated with CSF Aβ42 and CSF Aβ42/40 ratio r = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.30-0.69). Three studies found plasma Aβ42 to be positively associated with aPET positivity and CSF Aβ42; however, four other studies found no significant association between these variables. Seven studies reported no significant association of plasma Aβ40 with aPET or CSF Aβ40.

Conclusion: Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio seems as a promising plasma biomarker as it significantly correlates inversely with aPET positivity and directly with CSF Aβ42 and CSF Aβ42/40 ratio. However, more research is warranted, including validation studies, longitudinally clinical studies, studies comparing measurement methods and studies of Aβ kinetics.

血浆a β生物标志物对阿尔茨海默病早期诊断和预后的系统评价
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是全球最常见的痴呆症病因,需要一种具有成本效益的诊断性生物标志物。本系统综述了血浆β淀粉样蛋白(a β)作为AD生物标志物的研究现状,并探讨了这一研究方向的临床意义。方法:在PubMed检索2017 - 2021年血浆Aβ和AD。仅包括涉及淀粉样蛋白PET (aPET)或脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物分析(或两者兼有)的临床研究。尽可能进行CSF A - β42/40比值、aPET及血浆A - β42/40比值的meta分析。结果:共鉴定出17篇文献。血浆Aβ42/40比值与aPET阳性呈负相关r = -0.48(95%可信区间(CI): -0.65—0.31)。大量研究也发现血浆Aβ42/40比值与脑脊液Aβ42直接相关,脑脊液Aβ42/40比值r = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.30-0.69)。三项研究发现血浆Aβ42与aPET阳性和CSF Aβ42呈正相关;然而,另外四项研究发现这些变量之间没有显著的关联。7项研究报告血浆Aβ40与aPET或CSF Aβ40无显著相关性。结论:血浆a β42/40比值与aPET阳性呈显著负相关,与脑脊液a β42和脑脊液a β42/40比值直接相关,是一种有前景的血浆生物标志物。然而,更多的研究是必要的,包括验证研究,纵向临床研究,比较测量方法的研究和Aβ动力学的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信