Acute locomotor, heart rate and neuromuscular responses to added wearable resistance during soccer-specific training.

IF 3.5
Science & medicine in football Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1080/24733938.2023.2222100
Matthew Brown, Mathieu Lacome, Cedric Leduc, Karim Hader, Gael Guilhem, Martin Buchheit
{"title":"Acute locomotor, heart rate and neuromuscular responses to added wearable resistance during soccer-specific training.","authors":"Matthew Brown, Mathieu Lacome, Cedric Leduc, Karim Hader, Gael Guilhem, Martin Buchheit","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2023.2222100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Investigate acute locomotor, internal (heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE)) and neuromuscular responses to using wearable resistance loading for soccer-specific training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six footballers from a French 5th division team completed a 9-week parallel-group training intervention (intervention group: <i>n</i> = 14, control: <i>n</i> = 12). The intervention group trained with wearable resistance (200-g on each posterior, distal-calf) for full-training sessions on Day + 2, D + 4 and unloaded on D + 5. Between-group differences in locomotor (GPS) and internal load were analyzed for full-training sessions and game simulation drills. Neuromuscular status was evaluated using pre- and post-training box-to-box runs. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-modelling, effect size ±90% confidence limits (ES ± 90%CL) and magnitude-based decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Full-training sessions: Relative to the control, the wearable resistance group showed greater total distance (ES [lower, upper limits]: 0.25 [0.06, 0.44]), sprint distance (0.27 [0.08, 0.46]) and mechanical work (0.32 [0.13, 0.51]). Small game simulation (<190 m<sup>2</sup>/player): wearable resistance group showed small decreases in mechanical work (0.45 [0.14, 0.76]) and moderately lower average HR (0.68 [0.02, 1.34]). Large game simulation (>190 m<sup>2</sup>/player): no meaningful between-group differences were observed for all variables. Training induced small to moderate neuromuscular fatigue increases during post-training compared to pre-training box-to-box runs for both groups (Wearable resistance: 0.46 [0.31, 0.61], Control: 0.73 [0.53, 0.93]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For full training, wearable resistance induced higher locomotor responses, without affecting internal responses. Locomotor and internal outputs varied in response to game simulation size. Football-specific training with wearable resistance did not impact neuromuscular status differently than unloaded training.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"269-277"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2023.2222100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Investigate acute locomotor, internal (heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE)) and neuromuscular responses to using wearable resistance loading for soccer-specific training.

Methods: Twenty-six footballers from a French 5th division team completed a 9-week parallel-group training intervention (intervention group: n = 14, control: n = 12). The intervention group trained with wearable resistance (200-g on each posterior, distal-calf) for full-training sessions on Day + 2, D + 4 and unloaded on D + 5. Between-group differences in locomotor (GPS) and internal load were analyzed for full-training sessions and game simulation drills. Neuromuscular status was evaluated using pre- and post-training box-to-box runs. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-modelling, effect size ±90% confidence limits (ES ± 90%CL) and magnitude-based decisions.

Results: Full-training sessions: Relative to the control, the wearable resistance group showed greater total distance (ES [lower, upper limits]: 0.25 [0.06, 0.44]), sprint distance (0.27 [0.08, 0.46]) and mechanical work (0.32 [0.13, 0.51]). Small game simulation (<190 m2/player): wearable resistance group showed small decreases in mechanical work (0.45 [0.14, 0.76]) and moderately lower average HR (0.68 [0.02, 1.34]). Large game simulation (>190 m2/player): no meaningful between-group differences were observed for all variables. Training induced small to moderate neuromuscular fatigue increases during post-training compared to pre-training box-to-box runs for both groups (Wearable resistance: 0.46 [0.31, 0.61], Control: 0.73 [0.53, 0.93]).

Conclusion: For full training, wearable resistance induced higher locomotor responses, without affecting internal responses. Locomotor and internal outputs varied in response to game simulation size. Football-specific training with wearable resistance did not impact neuromuscular status differently than unloaded training.

在足球专项训练中,增加可穿戴阻力装置后的急性运动、心率和神经肌肉反应。
目的:调查在足球专项训练中使用可穿戴阻力负载后的急性运动、内分泌(心率(HR)和感知用力值(RPE))和神经肌肉反应:来自法国第五级别联赛球队的 26 名足球运动员完成了为期 9 周的平行分组训练干预(干预组:n = 14,对照组:n = 12)。干预组在第 2 天和第 4 天使用可穿戴阻力装置(小腿后侧和远侧各 200 克)进行全套训练,第 5 天则不使用阻力装置。对全面训练课和比赛模拟练习中运动(GPS)和内部负荷的组间差异进行了分析。通过训练前和训练后的箱对箱跑对神经肌肉状态进行评估。数据分析采用线性混合模型、效应大小±90%置信区间(ES ± 90%CL)和基于幅度的决策:全程训练:与对照组相比,可穿戴阻力组的总距离(ES [下限、上限]:0.25 [0.06, 0.44])、冲刺距离(0.27 [0.08, 0.46])和机械功(0.32 [0.13, 0.51])更大。小型模拟游戏(2 人/次):可穿戴阻力组的机械功(0.45 [0.14, 0.76])略有减少,平均心率(0.68 [0.02, 1.34])略有降低。大型模拟游戏(大于 190 平方米/人):在所有变量方面均未观察到有意义的组间差异。与训练前的盒对盒跑步相比,训练后两组的神经肌肉疲劳都有小到中等程度的增加(可穿戴阻力:0.46 [0.31, 0.61];对照组:0.73 [0.53, 0.93]):结论:在全面训练中,可穿戴阻力装置能诱发更高的运动反应,而不影响内部反应。运动和内部输出随比赛模拟规模的变化而变化。与无负荷训练相比,使用可穿戴阻力训练的足球专项训练对神经肌肉状态的影响并无不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信