Correlations between ultrasound, tomographic, and intraoperative measurements of the great saphenous vein used as an arterial graft.

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vinicius Adorno Gonçalves, Daniel Martins Vieira Zimmermann, Fábio Hüsemann Menezes
{"title":"Correlations between ultrasound, tomographic, and intraoperative measurements of the great saphenous vein used as an arterial graft.","authors":"Vinicius Adorno Gonçalves,&nbsp;Daniel Martins Vieira Zimmermann,&nbsp;Fábio Hüsemann Menezes","doi":"10.1590/1677-5449.202201212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The great saphenous vein is the major superficial vein of the lower limb, and also the most often used as arterial graft material for lower limb revascularization. Prior knowledge of the quality of the vein can guide choice of therapeutic strategy, avoiding surgery that is doomed to failure. Discrepancies between intraoperative findings of the quality of the great saphenous vein and imaging tests are also frequently observed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diameter of the great saphenous vein using two imaging methods (Duplex Ultrasound and Computed Tomography) and the gold-standard (intraoperative direct measurement of the vein), comparing the results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, observational study of data obtained during routine medical procedures performed by the Vascular Surgery team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 patients were evaluated, with a 12-month follow-up. 27 (65.85%) were male and mean age was 65.37 years. 19 (46.34%) patients had femoropopliteal grafts and 22 (53.66%) had distal grafts. Preoperative saphenous vein internal diameters measured with the patient supine were on average 16.4% smaller on CT and 33.8% smaller on US than the external diameters measured after intraoperative hydrostatic dilatation. There were no statistical differences in measurements when sex, weight, and height were considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Saphenous vein diameters were underestimated by preoperative US and CT scans when compared to intraoperative measurements. Thus, in patients undergoing graft planning for revascularization, the choice of conduit should take this data into consideration, so that use of the saphenous vein is not ruled out unnecessarily during planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":14814,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.202201212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The great saphenous vein is the major superficial vein of the lower limb, and also the most often used as arterial graft material for lower limb revascularization. Prior knowledge of the quality of the vein can guide choice of therapeutic strategy, avoiding surgery that is doomed to failure. Discrepancies between intraoperative findings of the quality of the great saphenous vein and imaging tests are also frequently observed.

Objectives: To evaluate the diameter of the great saphenous vein using two imaging methods (Duplex Ultrasound and Computed Tomography) and the gold-standard (intraoperative direct measurement of the vein), comparing the results.

Methods: Prospective, observational study of data obtained during routine medical procedures performed by the Vascular Surgery team.

Results: 41 patients were evaluated, with a 12-month follow-up. 27 (65.85%) were male and mean age was 65.37 years. 19 (46.34%) patients had femoropopliteal grafts and 22 (53.66%) had distal grafts. Preoperative saphenous vein internal diameters measured with the patient supine were on average 16.4% smaller on CT and 33.8% smaller on US than the external diameters measured after intraoperative hydrostatic dilatation. There were no statistical differences in measurements when sex, weight, and height were considered.

Conclusions: Saphenous vein diameters were underestimated by preoperative US and CT scans when compared to intraoperative measurements. Thus, in patients undergoing graft planning for revascularization, the choice of conduit should take this data into consideration, so that use of the saphenous vein is not ruled out unnecessarily during planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

作为动脉移植物的大隐静脉的超声、断层扫描和术中测量的相关性。
背景:大隐静脉是下肢的主要浅静脉,也是下肢血运重建术中最常用的动脉移植材料。对静脉质量的先验知识可以指导治疗策略的选择,避免手术注定失败。术中发现的大隐静脉质量与影像学检查之间的差异也经常被观察到。目的:采用双工超声和计算机断层扫描两种成像方法和金标准(术中直接测量静脉)对大隐静脉直径进行评价,并对结果进行比较。方法:前瞻性、观察性研究血管外科团队在常规医疗程序中获得的数据。结果:41例患者被评估,随访12个月。男性27例(65.85%),平均年龄65.37岁。股骨远端移植19例(46.34%),远端移植22例(53.66%)。术前患者仰卧位测得的隐静脉内径比术中静压扩张后测得的内径平均小16.4%,US小33.8%。当考虑性别、体重和身高时,测量结果没有统计学差异。结论:与术中测量相比,术前US和CT扫描低估了隐静脉直径。因此,在进行移植物血运重建计划的患者中,导管的选择应考虑到这些数据,以便在计划过程中不排除不必要地使用隐静脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Jornal Vascular Brasileiro is editated and published quaterly to select and disseminate high-quality scientific contents concerning original research, novel surgical and diagnostic techniques, and clinical observations in the field of vascular surgery, angiology, and endovascular surgery. Its abbreviated title is J. Vasc. Bras., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信