Mucosal brushings for nasal specific IgE to predict house dust mite driven allergic rhinitis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Aneeza W Hamizan, Raquel Alvarado, Khaizurin Tajul Arifin, Farah Dayana Zahedi, Ng Chong Sian, Anna Fariza Jumaat, Salina Husain, Man Sau Wong
{"title":"Mucosal brushings for nasal specific IgE to predict house dust mite driven allergic rhinitis.","authors":"Aneeza W Hamizan, Raquel Alvarado, Khaizurin Tajul Arifin, Farah Dayana Zahedi, Ng Chong Sian, Anna Fariza Jumaat, Salina Husain, Man Sau Wong","doi":"10.12932/AP-031122-1495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin prick testing and serological identification of allergen specific immunoglobulin E (spIgE) are standard tests for allergic rhinitis but can only identify systemic responses. In contrast, nasal allergen challenge (NAC), directly assess localized nasal mucosal reactivity, but is time consuming. Identification of spIgE from nasal brushings (nasal spIgE) is an alternative technique.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of nasal spIgE compared to NAC in order predict house dust mite (HDM) driven AR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diagnostic cross-sectional study involving adult rhinitis patients was performed. Sensitization to HDM allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), Dermatophagoides farina (DF) were assessed serologically and/or skin prick test, nasal brushing and NAC. Patients with both positive systemic test and NAC were defined to have HDM driven AR, while patients with a positive systemic test and negative NAC were defined to have non-clinically relevant HDM sensitization. The performance of nasal spIgE to predict positive NAC was determined using the receiver operating curve. The chosen cut-off was then used to predict HDM driven AR among those with positive systemic test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>118 patients (29.42 ± 9.32 years, 61.9% female) were included. Nasal spIgE was predictive of positive NAC (AUC 0.93, 95%CI: 0.88-0.98, p < 0.01). Among those with positive systemic test, the cut-off value of >0.14 kUA/L was able to predict HDM AR from incidental HDM sensitization with 92% sensitivity and 86% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nasal spIgE is comparable to NAC. A cut-off value of >0.14 kUA/L identifies HDM-driven AR from incidental sensitization among patients with positive systemic tests for allergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8552,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","volume":" ","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-031122-1495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skin prick testing and serological identification of allergen specific immunoglobulin E (spIgE) are standard tests for allergic rhinitis but can only identify systemic responses. In contrast, nasal allergen challenge (NAC), directly assess localized nasal mucosal reactivity, but is time consuming. Identification of spIgE from nasal brushings (nasal spIgE) is an alternative technique.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of nasal spIgE compared to NAC in order predict house dust mite (HDM) driven AR.

Methods: A diagnostic cross-sectional study involving adult rhinitis patients was performed. Sensitization to HDM allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), Dermatophagoides farina (DF) were assessed serologically and/or skin prick test, nasal brushing and NAC. Patients with both positive systemic test and NAC were defined to have HDM driven AR, while patients with a positive systemic test and negative NAC were defined to have non-clinically relevant HDM sensitization. The performance of nasal spIgE to predict positive NAC was determined using the receiver operating curve. The chosen cut-off was then used to predict HDM driven AR among those with positive systemic test.

Results: 118 patients (29.42 ± 9.32 years, 61.9% female) were included. Nasal spIgE was predictive of positive NAC (AUC 0.93, 95%CI: 0.88-0.98, p < 0.01). Among those with positive systemic test, the cut-off value of >0.14 kUA/L was able to predict HDM AR from incidental HDM sensitization with 92% sensitivity and 86% specificity.

Conclusions: Nasal spIgE is comparable to NAC. A cut-off value of >0.14 kUA/L identifies HDM-driven AR from incidental sensitization among patients with positive systemic tests for allergy.

鼻腔粘膜刷洗特异性IgE预测屋尘螨引起的过敏性鼻炎。
背景:皮肤点刺试验和过敏原特异性免疫球蛋白E (spIgE)的血清学鉴定是变应性鼻炎的标准试验,但只能识别全身反应。相比之下,鼻腔过敏原激发(NAC),直接评估局部鼻黏膜反应性,但耗时。从鼻刷中鉴定spIgE(鼻spIgE)是一种替代技术。目的:比较鼻spIgE与NAC在预测屋尘螨(HDM)引起的ar中的诊断价值。方法:对成人鼻炎患者进行诊断横断研究。采用血清学和/或皮肤点刺试验、刷鼻和NAC对HDM变应原(翼状棘球绦虫(DP)、粉状棘球绦虫(DF))的致敏性进行评估。全身试验和NAC均阳性的患者被定义为HDM驱动的AR,而全身试验阳性和NAC阴性的患者被定义为非临床相关的HDM致敏。使用受试者工作曲线确定鼻腔spIgE预测NAC阳性的性能。然后使用选择的截止值来预测系统测试阳性的HDM驱动的AR。结果:纳入118例患者(29.42±9.32岁,女性61.9%)。鼻spIgE可预测NAC阳性(AUC 0.93, 95%CI: 0.88 ~ 0.98, p < 0.01)。在系统检测阳性的患者中,截断值>0.14 kUA/L能够预测HDM偶发致敏的AR,灵敏度为92%,特异性为86%。结论:鼻spIgE与NAC具有可比性。截断值为bb0 0.14 kUA/L,确定hdm驱动的AR来自过敏系统试验阳性患者的偶然致敏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology (APJAI) is an online open access journal with the recent impact factor (2018) 1.747 APJAI published 4 times per annum (March, June, September, December). Four issues constitute one volume. APJAI publishes original research articles of basic science, clinical science and reviews on various aspects of allergy and immunology. This journal is an official journal of and published by the Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Association, Thailand. The scopes include mechanism, pathogenesis, host-pathogen interaction, host-environment interaction, allergic diseases, immune-mediated diseases, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, immunotherapy, and vaccine. All papers are published in English and are refereed to international standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信