Caregiving for older people living with chronic pain: analysis of the English longitudinal study of ageing and health survey for England.

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Toby Smith, Michael Mansfield, Sarah Hanson, Allie Welsh, Reema Khoury, Allan Clark, Emma Dures, Jo Adams
{"title":"Caregiving for older people living with chronic pain: analysis of the English longitudinal study of ageing and health survey for England.","authors":"Toby Smith,&nbsp;Michael Mansfield,&nbsp;Sarah Hanson,&nbsp;Allie Welsh,&nbsp;Reema Khoury,&nbsp;Allan Clark,&nbsp;Emma Dures,&nbsp;Jo Adams","doi":"10.1177/20494637221144250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain is a disabling condition. Many people with chronic pain seek informal support for everyday activities of daily living (ADL). However, there remains uncertainty on the type of people with chronic pain who access this support, what types of support they need and who provides such support. The purpose of this analysis was to answer these uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Health Survey for England (HSE) and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) were accessed. People who reported chronic pain (moderate or above for minimum of 12 months) were identified. From these cohorts, we determined if individuals self-reported receiving informal care. Data on caregiver profiles and caregiving activities were reported through descriptive statistics. Logistic regression analyses were performed to compare health status outcomes between people with pain who received and who did not receive informal care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2178 people with chronic pain from the ELSA cohort and 571 from the HSE cohort were analysed. People who received care were frequently female, older aged with several medical morbidities including musculoskeletal diseases such as arthritis. People with chronic pain received informal care for several diverse tasks. Most frequently these related to instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) such as shopping and housework. They were most frequently provided by partners or their children. Although they reported greater disability and symptoms (<i>p</i> < 0.001), people who received care did not report differences in health status, loneliness or wellbeing (<i>p</i> = 0.27; <i>p</i> = 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whilst it may be possible to characterise people living in chronic pain who receive informal care, there is some uncertainty on the impact of informal caregiving on their health and wellbeing. Consideration should now be made on how best to support both care recipients and informal caregivers, to ensure their health and quality of life is promoted whilst living with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":"17 2","pages":"166-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/f0/10.1177_20494637221144250.PMC10088417.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637221144250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is a disabling condition. Many people with chronic pain seek informal support for everyday activities of daily living (ADL). However, there remains uncertainty on the type of people with chronic pain who access this support, what types of support they need and who provides such support. The purpose of this analysis was to answer these uncertainties.

Methods: Data from the Health Survey for England (HSE) and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) were accessed. People who reported chronic pain (moderate or above for minimum of 12 months) were identified. From these cohorts, we determined if individuals self-reported receiving informal care. Data on caregiver profiles and caregiving activities were reported through descriptive statistics. Logistic regression analyses were performed to compare health status outcomes between people with pain who received and who did not receive informal care.

Results: 2178 people with chronic pain from the ELSA cohort and 571 from the HSE cohort were analysed. People who received care were frequently female, older aged with several medical morbidities including musculoskeletal diseases such as arthritis. People with chronic pain received informal care for several diverse tasks. Most frequently these related to instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) such as shopping and housework. They were most frequently provided by partners or their children. Although they reported greater disability and symptoms (p < 0.001), people who received care did not report differences in health status, loneliness or wellbeing (p = 0.27; p = 0.46).

Conclusions: Whilst it may be possible to characterise people living in chronic pain who receive informal care, there is some uncertainty on the impact of informal caregiving on their health and wellbeing. Consideration should now be made on how best to support both care recipients and informal caregivers, to ensure their health and quality of life is promoted whilst living with chronic pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对患有慢性疼痛的老年人的护理:对英国老龄化和健康调查纵向研究的分析。
背景:慢性疼痛是一种致残状况。许多慢性疼痛患者寻求日常生活活动(ADL)的非正式支持。然而,对于获得这种支持的慢性疼痛患者的类型,他们需要哪种类型的支持以及谁提供这种支持仍然存在不确定性。本分析的目的是回答这些不确定性。方法:查阅英国健康调查(HSE)和英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的数据。报告慢性疼痛(中度或以上至少12个月)的人被确定。从这些队列中,我们确定个人是否自我报告接受非正式护理。通过描述性统计报告护理人员概况和护理活动的数据。进行逻辑回归分析,比较接受和未接受非正式护理的疼痛患者的健康状况结果。结果:分析了来自ELSA队列的2178名慢性疼痛患者和来自HSE队列的571名患者。接受护理的人通常是女性,年龄较大,患有多种疾病,包括关节炎等肌肉骨骼疾病。患有慢性疼痛的人接受了几种不同任务的非正式护理。最常见的是与日常生活的工具性活动(IADL)有关,如购物和家务。它们通常是由伴侣或子女提供的。虽然他们报告了更大的残疾和症状(p < 0.001),但接受护理的人在健康状况、孤独感或幸福感方面没有报告差异(p = 0.27;P = 0.46)。结论:虽然有可能描述接受非正式护理的慢性疼痛患者的特征,但非正式护理对他们的健康和福祉的影响存在一些不确定性。现在应考虑如何最好地支持护理接受者和非正式护理者,以确保他们在患有慢性疼痛的情况下促进健康和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信