Current status of the combined spinal-epidural technique in obstetrics and surgery

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Eva Roofthooft MD , Narinder Rawal Professor, MD, PhD, FRCA (Hon), EDRA , Marc Van de Velde Professor, MD, PhD, EDRA
{"title":"Current status of the combined spinal-epidural technique in obstetrics and surgery","authors":"Eva Roofthooft MD ,&nbsp;Narinder Rawal Professor, MD, PhD, FRCA (Hon), EDRA ,&nbsp;Marc Van de Velde Professor, MD, PhD, EDRA","doi":"10.1016/j.bpa.2023.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Epidural and spinal blocks are well-accepted neuraxial techniques but both have several disadvantages. Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) can combine the best features of both techniques and reduce or eliminate these disadvantages. It provides the rapidity, density, and reliability of subarachnoid block with the flexibility of catheter epidural technique to extend the duration of anesthesia/analgesia (and to improve spinal block). It is an excellent technique for determining minimum intrathecal </span>drug doses. Although most commonly employed in </span>obstetric<span><span> practice, CSE is also used in a wide variety of non-obstetric surgical procedures including orthopedic, vascular, gynecological, urological, and general surgical procedures. The needle-through-needle technique remains the most commonly used method to perform CSE. Several technical variations including Sequential CSE and Epidural Volume Extention (EVE) are commonly used particularly in obstetric and high-risk patients such as those with cardiac disease where a slower onset of sympathetic block is desirable. The risks of complications such as epidural </span>catheter migration<span> through the dural hole, neurological complications, and subarachnoid spread of epidurally administered drugs are possible but have not been a clinically relevant problem in the 40+ years of their existence.</span></span></p><p>In obstetrics, CSE is used for labor pain because it produces rapid-onset analgesia with reduced local anesthetic<span><span> consumption and less motor block. The epidural catheter placed as part of a CSE is more reliable than a catheter placed as part of a conventional epidural. Less breakthrough pain throughout labor is noted and fewer catheters require replacing. Side effects of CSE include greater potential for hypotension and more </span>fetal heart rate<span> abnormalities. CSE is also used for cesarean delivery. The main purpose is to decrease the spinal dose so that spinal-induced hypotension can be reduced. However, reducing the spinal dose requires an epidural catheter to avoid intra-operative pain when surgery is prolonged.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48541,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","volume":"37 2","pages":"Pages 189-198"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521689623000228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidural and spinal blocks are well-accepted neuraxial techniques but both have several disadvantages. Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) can combine the best features of both techniques and reduce or eliminate these disadvantages. It provides the rapidity, density, and reliability of subarachnoid block with the flexibility of catheter epidural technique to extend the duration of anesthesia/analgesia (and to improve spinal block). It is an excellent technique for determining minimum intrathecal drug doses. Although most commonly employed in obstetric practice, CSE is also used in a wide variety of non-obstetric surgical procedures including orthopedic, vascular, gynecological, urological, and general surgical procedures. The needle-through-needle technique remains the most commonly used method to perform CSE. Several technical variations including Sequential CSE and Epidural Volume Extention (EVE) are commonly used particularly in obstetric and high-risk patients such as those with cardiac disease where a slower onset of sympathetic block is desirable. The risks of complications such as epidural catheter migration through the dural hole, neurological complications, and subarachnoid spread of epidurally administered drugs are possible but have not been a clinically relevant problem in the 40+ years of their existence.

In obstetrics, CSE is used for labor pain because it produces rapid-onset analgesia with reduced local anesthetic consumption and less motor block. The epidural catheter placed as part of a CSE is more reliable than a catheter placed as part of a conventional epidural. Less breakthrough pain throughout labor is noted and fewer catheters require replacing. Side effects of CSE include greater potential for hypotension and more fetal heart rate abnormalities. CSE is also used for cesarean delivery. The main purpose is to decrease the spinal dose so that spinal-induced hypotension can be reduced. However, reducing the spinal dose requires an epidural catheter to avoid intra-operative pain when surgery is prolonged.

腰麻-硬膜外联合技术在妇外科的应用现状
硬膜外阻滞和脊椎阻滞是公认的神经轴技术,但两者都有几个缺点。联合脊膜-硬膜外麻醉(CSE)可以结合这两种技术的最佳特点,减少或消除这些缺点。它提供了蛛网膜下腔阻滞的快速性、密度和可靠性,并具有导管硬膜外技术的灵活性,以延长麻醉/镇痛的持续时间(并改善脊椎阻滞)。这是一种很好的确定鞘内最小药物剂量的技术。尽管CSE最常用于产科实践,但它也用于各种非产科手术,包括骨科、血管科、妇科、泌尿科和普通外科手术。针穿针技术仍然是进行CSE最常用的方法。包括顺序CSE和硬膜外容积扩张术(EVE)在内的几种技术变体通常用于产科和高危患者,如心脏病患者,其中需要较慢的交感神经阻滞发作。硬膜外导管穿过硬膜孔、神经系统并发症和硬膜外给药的蛛网膜下腔扩散等并发症的风险是可能的,但在其存在的40多年中,尚未成为临床相关问题。在产科,CSE用于分娩疼痛,因为它可以产生快速起效的镇痛,减少局部麻醉剂的消耗,减少运动阻滞。作为CSE一部分的硬膜外导管比作为传统硬膜外导管的一部分的导管更可靠。分娩过程中的突破性疼痛较少,需要更换的导管也较少。CSE的副作用包括更大的低血压可能性和更多的胎儿心率异常。CSE也用于剖宫产。主要目的是减少脊髓剂量,从而减少脊髓引起的低血压。然而,减少脊髓剂量需要硬膜外导管,以避免手术时间延长时的术中疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信