Clinical and Imaging Evaluation of COVID-19-Related Olfactory Dysfunction.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Eslam Hamed Elsayed Abdou, Hisham Atef Ebada, Mohammed Abdelbadie Salem, Mahitab Mohamed Rashad Ghoneim, Fatma Sherif, Elsharawy Kamal
{"title":"Clinical and Imaging Evaluation of COVID-19-Related Olfactory Dysfunction.","authors":"Eslam Hamed Elsayed Abdou,&nbsp;Hisham Atef Ebada,&nbsp;Mohammed Abdelbadie Salem,&nbsp;Mahitab Mohamed Rashad Ghoneim,&nbsp;Fatma Sherif,&nbsp;Elsharawy Kamal","doi":"10.1177/19458924231163969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olfactory dysfunction has been reported in 47.85% of COVID patients. It can be broadly categorized into conductive or sensorineural olfactory loss. Conductive loss occurs due to impaired nasal air flow, while sensorineural loss implies dysfunction of the olfactory epithelium or central olfactory pathways.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and imaging findings in patients with COVID-related olfactory dysfunction. Additionally, the study aimed to investigate the possible mechanisms of COVID-related olfactory dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 110 patients with post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction, and a control group of 50 COVID-negative subjects with normal olfactory function. Endoscopic nasal examination was performed for all participants with special focus on the olfactory cleft. Smell testing was performed for all participants by using a smell diskettes test. Olfactory pathway magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to assess the condition of the olfactory cleft and the dimensions and volume of the olfactory bulb.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Olfactory dysfunction was not associated with nasal symptoms in 51.8% of patients. MRI showed significantly increased olfactory bulb dimensions and volume competed to controls. Additionally, it revealed olfactory cleft edema in 57.3% of patients. On the other hand, radiological evidence of sinusitis was detected in only 15.5% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The average olfactory bulb volumes were significantly higher in the patients' group compared to the control group, indicating significant edema and swelling in the olfactory bulb in patients with COVID-related olfactory dysfunction. Furthermore, in most patients, no sinonasal symptoms such as nasal congestion or rhinorrhea were reported, and similarly, no radiological evidence of sinusitis was detected. Consequently, the most probable mechanism of COVID-related olfactory dysfunction is sensorineural loss through virus spread and damage to the olfactory epithelium and pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":"37 4","pages":"456-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034563/pdf/10.1177_19458924231163969.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924231163969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Olfactory dysfunction has been reported in 47.85% of COVID patients. It can be broadly categorized into conductive or sensorineural olfactory loss. Conductive loss occurs due to impaired nasal air flow, while sensorineural loss implies dysfunction of the olfactory epithelium or central olfactory pathways.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and imaging findings in patients with COVID-related olfactory dysfunction. Additionally, the study aimed to investigate the possible mechanisms of COVID-related olfactory dysfunction.

Methods: The study included 110 patients with post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction, and a control group of 50 COVID-negative subjects with normal olfactory function. Endoscopic nasal examination was performed for all participants with special focus on the olfactory cleft. Smell testing was performed for all participants by using a smell diskettes test. Olfactory pathway magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to assess the condition of the olfactory cleft and the dimensions and volume of the olfactory bulb.

Results: Olfactory dysfunction was not associated with nasal symptoms in 51.8% of patients. MRI showed significantly increased olfactory bulb dimensions and volume competed to controls. Additionally, it revealed olfactory cleft edema in 57.3% of patients. On the other hand, radiological evidence of sinusitis was detected in only 15.5% of patients.

Conclusion: The average olfactory bulb volumes were significantly higher in the patients' group compared to the control group, indicating significant edema and swelling in the olfactory bulb in patients with COVID-related olfactory dysfunction. Furthermore, in most patients, no sinonasal symptoms such as nasal congestion or rhinorrhea were reported, and similarly, no radiological evidence of sinusitis was detected. Consequently, the most probable mechanism of COVID-related olfactory dysfunction is sensorineural loss through virus spread and damage to the olfactory epithelium and pathways.

新冠肺炎相关嗅觉功能障碍的临床与影像学评价
背景:47.85%的COVID患者报告了嗅觉功能障碍。它可大致分为传导性嗅觉丧失和感觉神经性嗅觉丧失。导电性损失是由于鼻腔气流受损造成的,而感音神经损失意味着嗅觉上皮或中枢嗅觉通路的功能障碍。目的:分析新冠肺炎相关嗅觉功能障碍患者的临床和影像学表现。此外,本研究旨在探讨新冠肺炎相关嗅觉功能障碍的可能机制。方法:选取110例新冠肺炎后嗅觉功能障碍患者为研究对象,另设50例嗅觉功能正常的新冠肺炎阴性对照组。对所有参与者进行鼻内窥镜检查,特别关注嗅裂。对所有参与者进行气味测试,使用气味测试盘。采用嗅通道磁共振成像(MRI)评估嗅裂的情况和嗅球的尺寸和体积。结果:51.8%的患者嗅觉功能障碍不伴有鼻症状。MRI显示嗅球尺寸和体积比对照组明显增加。此外,57.3%的患者出现嗅裂水肿。另一方面,鼻窦炎的影像学证据仅在15.5%的患者中被发现。结论:患者组嗅球平均体积明显高于对照组,提示新冠肺炎相关嗅觉功能障碍患者嗅球明显水肿、肿胀。此外,在大多数患者中,没有鼻塞或鼻漏等鼻窦症状的报告,同样,没有检测到鼻窦炎的放射证据。因此,与新冠病毒相关的嗅觉功能障碍最可能的机制是通过病毒传播和嗅觉上皮和通路损伤引起的感觉神经丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信